Abstract
Human participants searched in a real environment or interactive 3-D virtual environment open field for four hidden goal locations arranged in a 2 × 2 square configuration in a 5 × 5 matrix of raised bins. The participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: cues 1 pattern or pattern only. The participants experienced a training phase, followed by a testing phase. Visual cues specified the goal locations during training only for the cues 1 pattern group. Both groups were then tested in the absence of visual cues. The results in both environments indicated that the participants learned the spatial relations among goal locations. However, visual cues during training facilitated learning of the spatial relations among goal locations: In both environments, the participants trained with the visual cues made fewer errors during testing than did those trained only with the pattern. The results suggest that learning based on the spatial relations among locations may not be susceptible to cue competition effects and have implications for standard associative and dual-system accounts of spatial learning.
Article PDF
References
Brown, M. F. (2006). Abstracting spatial relations among goal locations. In M. F. Brown & R. G. Cook (Eds.), Animal spatial cognition: Comparative, neural, and computational approaches [Online]. Available at www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/asc/brown.
Brown, M. F., & Terrinoni, M. (1996). Control of choice by the spatial configuration of goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 438–446.
Brown, M. F., Yang, S. Y., & DiGian, K. A. (2002). No evidence for overshadowing or facilitation of spatial pattern learning by visual cues. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 363–375.
Burgess, N. (2006). Spatial memory: How egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 551–557.
Chamizo, V. D. (2003). Acquisition of knowledge about spatial location: Assessing the generality of the mechanism of learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 102–113.
Cheng, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition, 23, 149–178.
Cheng, K. (2008). Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 355–361.
Cheng, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2005). Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1–23.
Cheng, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2006). Geometry, features, and orientation in vertebrate animals: A pictorial review. In M. F. Brown & R. G. Cook (Eds.), Animal spatial cognition: Comparative, neural, and computational approaches [Online]. Available at www.pigeon .psy.tufts.edu/asc/cheng.
Cheng, K., Shettleworth, S. J., Huttenlocher, J., & Rieser, J. J. (2007). Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 625–637.
Doeller, C. F., & Burgess, N. (2008). Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning location relative to landmarks and boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 5909–5914.
Doeller, C. F., King, J. A., & Burgess, N. (2008). Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 5915–5920.
Ellmore, T. M., & McNaughton, B. L. (2004). Human path integration by optic flow. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 4, 255–272.
Etienne, A. S., Berlie, J., Georgakopoulos, J., & Maurer, R. (1998). Role of dead reckoning in navigation. In S. Healy (Ed.), Spatial representation in animals (pp. 54–68). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Graham, M., Good, M. A., McGregor, A., & Pearce, J. M. (2006). Spatial learning based on the shape of the environment is influenced by properties of the objects forming the shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 44–59.
Healy, S. (1998). Spatial representation in animals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kearns, M. J., Warren, W. H., Duchon, A. P., & Tarr, M. (2002). Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task. Perception, 31, 349–374.
Kelly, D. M., & Gibson, B. M. (2007). Spatial navigation: Spatial learning in real and virtual environments. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 2, 111–124.
Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9, 293–298.
Miller, N. Y., & Shettleworth, S. J. (2007). Learning about environmental geometry: An associative model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 191–212.
Nico, D., Israël, I., & Berthoz, A. (2002). Interaction of visual and ideothetic information in a path completion task. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 379–382.
Pearce, J. M., Graham, M., Good, M. A., Jones, P. M., & McGregor, A. (2006). Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 201–214.
Plumert, J. M., & Spencer, J. P. (2007). The emerging spatial mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rescorla, R. A., & Durlach, P. (1981). Within-event learning in Pavlovian conditioning. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 81–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shettleworth, S. J. (1998). Cognition, evolution, and behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sturz, B. R., Bodily, K. D., Katz, J. S., & Kelly, D. M. (2009). Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans: Generality across real and virtual environments. Animal Cognition, 12, 237–247. doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0182-z
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was conducted following the relevant ethical guidelines for human research and was supported by an Alzheimer Society of Canada Grant to D.M.K.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sturz, B.R., Brown, M.F. & Kelly, D.i.M. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: Implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 306–312 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.306
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.306