Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition
- 634 Downloads
Speech perception requires listeners to integrate multiple cues that each contribute to judgments about a phonetic category. Classic studies of trading relations assessed the weights attached to each cue but did not explore the time course of cue integration. Here, we provide the first direct evidence that asynchronous cues to voicing (/b/ vs. /p/) and manner (/b/ vs. /w/) contrasts become available to the listener at different times during spoken word recognition. Using the visual world paradigm, we show that the probability of eye movements to pictures of target and of competitor objects diverge at different points in time after the onset of the target word. These points of divergence correspond to the availability of early (voice onset time or formant transition slope) and late (vowel length) cues to voicing and manner contrasts. These results support a model of cue integration in which phonetic cues are used for lexical access as soon as they are available.
KeywordsFormant Transition Speech Perception Word Pair Lexical Access Voice Onset Time
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Crosswhite, K., Masharov, M., McDonough, J., & Tenenhaus, M. K. (2008). Phonetic cues to word length in the online processing of onset-embedded word pairs. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Kingston, J. (2005). Ears to categories: New 4arguments for autonomy. In S. Frota, M. Vigario, & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Prosodies: With special reference to Iberian language (p. 177–222). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- McMurray, B. (2008). KlattWorks: A (somewhat) new systematic approach to formant-based speech synthesis for empirical research. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
- McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (in press). Withincategory VOT affects recovery from “lexical” garden paths: Evidence against phoneme-level inhibition. Journal of Memory & Language.Google Scholar
- Miller, J. L., & Dexter, E. R. (1988). Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 369–378.Google Scholar
- Summerfield, Q. (1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 7, 1074–1095.Google Scholar