Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article
Latent structure in measures of associative, semantic, and thematic knowledge
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Brief Reports
  • Published: June 2008

Latent structure in measures of associative, semantic, and thematic knowledge

  • William S. Maki1 &
  • Erin Buchanan1 

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review volume 15, pages 598–603 (2008)Cite this article

  • 888 Accesses

  • 38 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

There has been much debate about the relation between knowledge for meaning (semantic memory) and knowledge for words in context (associative memory). Many measures of that knowledge exist, but do they all measure the same thing? In this study, scaling, clustering, and factor-analytic techniques were used to reveal the structure underlying 13 variables. Semantic similarity determined from lexicographic measures is shown to be separable from the associative strength determined from word association norms, and these semantic and associative measures are in turn separable from abstract representations derived from computational analyses of large bodies of text. The three-factor structure is at odds with traditional views of word knowledge. The expression of long-term knowledge about words and the concepts they represent may be better viewed in terms of associative, semantic, and thematic information.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Banerjee, S., & Pedersen, T. (2002). An adapted Lesk algorithm for word sense disambiguation using WordNet. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, February 17–23, Mexico City.

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. (1965). The structure of associations in language and thought. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esper, E. A. (1973). Analogy and association in linguistics and psychology. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum, C. (Ed.) (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Available at wordnet.princeton.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, J. R. (1968). A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. In F. R. Palmer (Ed.), Selected papers of J. R. Firth 1952–1959 (pp. 137–167). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1879). Psychometric experiments. Brain, 2, 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review, 114, 211–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, K. A. (2003). Is semantic priming due to association strength or featural overlap? A microanalytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 785–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J. J., & Conrath, D. W. (1997). Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. Proceedings of International Conference Research on Computational Linguistics (ROCLING X), Taiwan.

  • Jones, M. N., Kintsch, W., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2006). High-dimensional semantic space accounts of priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 55, 534–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2003). A factor simplicity index. Psychometrika, 68, 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 88–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, M. (2000). Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 618–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki, W. S. (2007). Judgments of associative memory. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 319–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 547–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michelizzi, J., & Pedersen, T. (2005). WordNet-SenseRelate-WordToSet-0.02. Available at search.cpan.org/dist/WordNet-SenseRelate-WordToSet.

  • Nelson, D. L., Dyrdal, G. M., & Goodmon, L. B. (2005). What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 711–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 402–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patwardhan, S., & Pedersen, T. (2003). WordNet::Similarity. Available at search.cpan.org/dist/WordNet-Similarity.

  • Spence, D. P., & Owens, K. C. (1990). Lexical co-occurrence and association strength. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19, 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS for Windows, Rel. 14.0.0. (2005). Chicago: SPSS Inc.

  • Steyvers, M., Shiffrin, R. M., & Nelson, D. L. (2005). Word association spaces for predicting semantic similarity effects in episodic memory. In A. F. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp. 237–249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (1999). On the myth of automatic semantic activation in reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 61–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. S. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, D., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 183–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. N. (1996). Is automatic priming semantic? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 113–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Texas Tech University, 79409, Lubbock, TX

    William S. Maki & Erin Buchanan

Authors
  1. William S. Maki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erin Buchanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William S. Maki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maki, W.S., Buchanan, E. Latent structure in measures of associative, semantic, and thematic knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 598–603 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.598

Download citation

  • Received: 03 September 2007

  • Accepted: 04 December 2007

  • Issue Date: June 2008

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.598

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Exploratory Factor Analysis
  • Semantic Similarity
  • Semantic Feature
  • Associative Strength
  • Semantic Priming
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 167.114.118.212

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.