Abstract
Long-term memory of haptic, visual, and cross-modality information was investigated. In Experiment 1, subjects briefly explored 40 commonplace objects visually or haptically and then received a recognition test with categorically similar foils in the same or the alternative modality both immediately and after 1 week. Recognition was best for visual input and test, with haptic memory still apparent after a week’s delay. Recognition was poorest in the cross-modality conditions, with performance on the haptic—visual and visual—haptic cross-modal conditions being nearly identical. Visual and haptic information decayed at similar rates across a week delay. In Experiment 2, subjects simultaneously viewed and handled the same objects, and transfer was tested in a successive cue-modality paradigm. Performance with the visual modality again exceeded that with the haptic modality. Furthermore, initial errors on the haptic test were often corrected when followed by the visual presentation, both immediately and after 1 week. However, visual test errors were corrected by haptic cuing on the immediate test only. These results are discussed in terms of shared information between the haptic and visual modalities, and the ease of transfer between these modalities immediately and after a substantial delay.
Article PDF
References
Amedi, A., Malach, R., Hendler, T., Peled, S., & Zohary, E. (2001). Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 324–330.
Bushnell, E. W., & Baxt, C. (1999). Children’s haptic and crossmodal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects.v Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1867–1881.
Easton, R. D., Srinivas, K., & Greene, A. J. (1997). Do vision and haptics share common representations? Implicit and explicit memory within and between modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 153–163.
Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429–433.
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Homa, D., & Viera, C. (1988). Long-term memory for pictures under conditions of thematically related foils. Memory & Cognition, 16, 411–421.
James, T. W., Humphrey, G. K., Gati, J. S., Servos, P., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1706–1714.
Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., & Metzger, V. A. (1985). Identifying objects by touch: An “expert system.” Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 299–302.
Mather, G. (2006). Foundations of perception. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press, Erlbaum.
Millar, S., & Al-Attar, Z. (2005). What aspects of vision facilitate haptic processing? Brain & Cognition, 59, 258–268.
Newell, F. N. (2004). Cross-modal object recognition. In G. A. Calvert, C. Spence, & B. E. Stein (Eds.), The handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 123–139). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nickerson, R. S. (1968). On long-term recognition memory for pictorial material. Psychonomic Science, 11, 58.
Norman, J. F., Norman, H. F., Clayton, A. M., Lianekhammy, J., & Zielke, G. (2004). The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 342–351.
Schooler, L. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2005). Efficiently measuring recognition performance with sparse data. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 3–10.
Shimojo, S., & Shams, L. (2001). Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: Plasticity and interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 505–509.
Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pensky, A.E.C., Johnson, K.A., Haag, S. et al. Delayed memory for visual—haptic exploration of familiar objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 574–580 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.574
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.574