Abstract
Massaro and Chen (2008) offer a commentary ostensibly on a recent article by Galantucci, Fowler, and Turvey (2006). Our article provided an evaluation of Alvin Liberman’s motor theory of speech perception. We considered it timely to evaluate the motor theory’s different claims, and we hoped to understand why the theory has been better received outside the field of speech than within it. Accordingly, we evaluated its component claims and embedded our presentation of the theory within a wider scientific context, rather than restricting it to the field of speech. However, Massaro and Chen did not undertake to understand the motor theory or to evaluate the effort by Galantucci et al. Rather, they chose to evaluate a different theory of speech than the one on which Galantucci et al. focused. They evaluated direct-realist theory, erroneously referring to it as a motor theory. I take this opportunity to clarify the difference, staving off potential confusion, and to address other errors in their critique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abler, W. (1989). The particulate principle of self-diversifying systems. Journal of Social & Biological Structures, 12, 1–13.
Bernstein, N. (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movements. New York: Pergamon. (Original work published 1935)
Best, C. (1995). A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language research (pp. 167–200). Timonium, MD: York.
Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 219–252.
Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155–180.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in speech production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–291.
Elman, J., & McClelland, J. (1986). Exploiting lawful variability in the speech wave. In J. Perkell & D. Klatt (Eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processes (pp. 360–385). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 399–402.
Fowler, C. A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics. 14, 3–28.
Fowler, C. A. (1996). Listeners do hear sounds not tongues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1730–1741.
Fowler, C. A. (1999). A universal algorithm for pattern recognition? Contemporary Psychology, 44, 12–14.
Fowler, C. A. (2003). Speech production and perception. In A. Healy & R. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Experimental psychology (pp. 237–266). New York: Wiley.
Fowler, C. A. (2006). Compensation for coarticulation reflects gesture perception, not spectral contrast. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 161–177.
Fowler, C. A., Brown, J., Sabadini, L., & Weihing, J. (2003). Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 296–314.
Fowler, C. A., & Dekle, D. (1991). Listening with eye and hand: Crossmodal contributions to speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 816–828.
Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 361–377.
Gaskell, G. (2007). The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Goldstein, L., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Articulatory phonology: A phonology for public language use. In N. O. Schiller & A. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 159–207). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–461.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Studdert-Kennedy, M., Harris, K. S., & Shankweiler, D. P. (1968). On the efficiency of speech sounds. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft & Kommunikationsforschung, 21, 1–21.
Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P., & Cooper, F. S. (1952). The role of selected stimulus variables in the perception of the unvoiced-stop consonants. American Journal of Psychology, 65, 497–516.
Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P., Cooper, F. S., & Gerstman, L. (1954). The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants. Psychological Monographs: General & Applied, 68, 1–13.
Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1–36.
Liberman, A. M., & Whalen, D. H. (2000). On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 187–196.
Massaro, D. (1972). Preperceptual images, processing time and perceptual units in auditory perception. Psychological Review, 79, 124–145.
Massaro, D. W., & Chen, T. H. (2008). The motor theory of speech perception revisited. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 453–457.
Massaro, D. W., & Jesse, A. (2007). Audiovisual speech perception and word recognition. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 19–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Öhman, S., (1966). Coarticulation in VCV utterances: Spectrographic measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, 151–168.
Recasens, D. (1984). Vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in Catalan VCV sequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 1624–1635.
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1998). The particulate origins of language generativity: From syllable to gesture. In M. Studdert-Kennedy & C. Knight (Eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language (pp. 202–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported by NICHD Grant HD-01994 and NIDCD Grant DC-03782 to Haskins Laboratories.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fowler, C.A. The FLMP STMPed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 458–462 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.458
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.458