Abstract
Novelty preferences (longer fixations on new stimuli than on previously presented stimuli) are widely used to assess memory in nonverbal populations, such as human infants and experimental animals, yet important questions remain about the nature of the processes that underlie them. We used a classical conditioning paradigm to test whether novelty preferences reflect (1) a stimulus-driven bias toward novelty in visual selective attention or (2) explicit memory for old stimuli. Results indicated that conditioning affected adults’ looking behavior in the visual paired comparison, but not their recognition memory judgments. Furthermore, the typically observed novelty preference occurred only when a bias toward novelty had no competition from a bias toward salience due to conditioning. These results suggest that novelty preferences may reflect attentional processes and implicit memory to a greater degree than explicit memory, a finding with important implications for understanding memory in nonverbal populations and the development of memory in humans.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., & Van den Bergh, O. (1990). Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A case for unaware affective-evaluative learning. Cognition & Emotion, 4, 3–18.
Begleiter, H., Porjesz, B., & Wang, W. (1993). A neurophysiologic correlate of visual short-term memory in humans. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 87, 46–53.
Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention [CSEA-NIMH] (1999). The international affective picture system: Digitized photographs. Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
Cohen, J.[D.], MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257–271.
Desimone, R. (1996). Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 13494–13499.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Reviews in Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
Fahy, F. L., Riches, I. P., & Brown, M. W. (1993). Neuronal activity related to visual recognition memory: Long-term memory and the encoding of recency and familiarity information in the primate anterior and medial inferior rhinal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 96, 457–472.
Fantz, R. L. (1964). Visual experience in infants: Decreased attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones. Science, 146, 668–670.
Haith, M. M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Is rich interpretation too costly? Infant Behavior & Development, 21, 167–179.
Hood, B. M. (2004). Is looking good enough or does it beggar belief ? Developmental Science, 7, 415–417.
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557–558.
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). The international affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
Li, L., Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R. (1993). The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 1918–1929.
Liu, Z., Kersten, D., & Knill, D. C. (1999). Dissociating stimulus information from internal representation—a case study in object recognition. Vision Research, 39, 603–612.
Mandler, J. M. (1988). How to build a baby: On the development of an accessible representational system. Cognitive Development, 3, 113–136.
Manns, J. R., Stark, C. E. L., & Squire, L. R. (2000). The visual paired-comparison task as a measure of declarative memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 12375–12379.
McKee, R. D., & Squire, L. R. (1993). On the development of declarative memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 397–404.
Miller, E. K., Gochin, P. M., & Gross, C. G. (1991). Habituation-like decrease in the responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex of the macaque. Visual Neuroscience, 7, 357–362.
Nelson, C. A. (1995). The ontogeny of human memory: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Developmental Psychology, 31, 723–738.
Nemanic, S., Alvarado, M. C., & Bachevalier, J. (2004). The hippocampal/parahippocampal regions and recognition memory: Insights from visual paired comparison versus object-delayed nonmatching in monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 2013–2026.
Nosofsky, R. M., & Zaki, S. R. (1998). Dissociations between categorization and recognition in amnesic and normal individuals: An exemplar-based interpretation. Psychological Science, 9, 247–255.
Palmeri, T. J., & Flanery, M. A. (1999). Learning about categories in the absence of training: Profound amnesia and the relationship between perceptual categorization and recognition memory. Psychological Science, 10, 526–530.
Pascalis, O., & de Schonen, S. (1994). Recognition memory in 3- to 4-day-old human neonates. NeuroReport, 5, 1721–1724.
Reicher, G. M., Snyder, C. R., & Richards, J. T. (1976). Familiarity of background characters in visual scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 522–530.
Roder, B. J., Bushnell, E. W., & Sasseville, A. M. (2000). Infants’ preferences for familiarity and novelty during the course of visual processing. Infancy, 1, 491–507.
Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., & Jankowski, J. J. (2004). Infant visual recognition memory. Developmental Review, 24, 74–100.
Rose, S. A., Gottfried, A. W., Melloy-Carminar, P., & Bridger, W. H. (1982). Familiarity and novelty preferences in infant recognition memory: Implications for information processing. Developmental Psychology, 18, 704–713.
Rovee-Collier, C. (1997). Dissociations in infant memory: Rethinking the development of implicit and explicit memory. Psychological Review, 104, 467–498.
Schacter, D. L., & Moscovitch, M. (1984). Infants, amnesics, and dissociable memory systems. In M. Moscovitch (Ed.), Infant memory (pp. 173–216). New York: Plenum.
Sirois, S., & Mareschal, D. (2004). An interacting systems model of infant habituation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1352–1362.
Snyder, K. A. (2007). Neural mechanisms underlying memory and attention in preferential looking tasks. In L. M. Oakes & P. J. Bauer (Eds.), Short- and long-term memory in infancy and early childhood: Taking the first steps toward remembering (pp. 179–208). New York: Oxford University Press.
Vanderplas, J. M., & Garvin, E. A. (1959a). The association value of random shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 147–154.
Vanderplas, J. M., & Garvin, E. A. (1959b). Complexity, association value, and practice as factors in shape recognition following paired-associates training. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 155–163.
Wan, H., Aggleton, J. P., & Brown, M. W. (1999). Different contributions of the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex to recognition memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1142–1148.
Zhu, X. O., Brown, M. W., McCabe, B. J., & Aggleton, J. P. (1995). Effects of the novelty or familiarity of visual stimuli on the expression of the intermediate early gene c-fos in rat brain. Neuroscience, 69, 821–829.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Research and manuscript preparation were made possible in part by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH12952) and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R03-HD049366) to K.A.S. and from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH60442) to C.J.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Snyder, K.A., Blank, M.P. & Marsolek, C.J. What form of memory underlies novelty preferences?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 315–321 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.315
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.315