Abstract
How do we determine who owns what? This article reports evidence indicating that we typically assume that the first person who possesses an object is its owner. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants read cartoons in which two children each take a turn playing with a toy. Participants selected the character who first possessed the toy when judging who owned it, but not when judging which character liked it more. In Experiment 3, participants read stories based on the Pierson v. Post (1805) property law case. In line with the appellate court’s ruling in that case, participants selected the character who first captured and possessed an animal as its owner over another character who had pursued it earlier. Together, these findings provide evidence for an assumption that specifically guides our reasoning about ownership and that may lead everyday intuitions about property to be generally consistent with property law.
References
Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 62, 229–237.
Beggan, J. K., & Brown, E. M. (1994). Association as a psychological justification for ownership. Journal of Psychology, 128, 365–380.
Blumenthal, J. A. (2002, March). Lay perceptions of property and nuisance: Do intuitions match legal doctrine? Poster session presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference, Austin, TX.
Darley, J. M. (2001). Citizens’ sense of justice and the legal system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 10–13.
Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Dukeminier, J., Krier, J. E., Alexander, G. S., & Schill, M. H. (2006). Property (6th ed). New York: Aspen Publishers.
Friedman, O., & Neary, K. R. (in press). Determining who owns what: Do children infer ownership from first possession? Cognition.
Hook, J. (1993). Judgments about the right to property from preschool to adulthood. Law & Human Behavior, 17, 135–146.
Lueck, D. (1995). The rule of first possession and the design of law. Journal of Law & Economics, 38, 393–436.
Miller, C. L. (1987). Qualitative differences among gender-stereotyped toys: Implications for cognitive and social development in girls and boys. Sex Roles, 16, 473–487.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7, 84–107.
Pierson v. Post, 3 Cal. R. 175, 2 Am. Dec. 264 (N.Y., 1805)
Shotland, R. L., & Hyers, L. (2000). Evidence for the common law as a hypothesis-generating tool for conflict resolution: What is fair? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2534–2557.
Snare, F. (1972). The concept of property. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9, 200–206.
Stake, J. E. (2004). The property“instinct.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359, 1763–1774.
Thaler, R. (1980). Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1, 39–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The cartoons in Experiments 1 and 2 were created with South Park Studio (www.sp-studio.de). This research was supported by a University of Waterloo/SSHRC Seed Grant, and by NSERC Grant RGPIN327362-06.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friedman, O. First possession: An assumption guiding inferences about who owns what. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 290–295 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.290
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.290