Abstract
Bar-Hillel and Budescu (1995) failed to find a desirability bias in probability estimation. The World Cup soccer tournament provided an opportunity to revisit the phenomenon in a context in which desirability biases are notoriously rampant. Participants estimated the probabilities of various teams’ winning their upcoming games. They were promised money if one team—randomly designated by the experimenter—won its upcoming game. Participants assigned a higher probability to a victory by their target team than did other participants, whose promised monetary reward was contingent on the victory of its opponent. Prima facie, this seems to be a desirability bias. However, in a follow-up study that made one team salient, without promising monetary rewards, participants also judged their target team to be more likely to win. On grounds of parsimony, we conclude that what appears to be a desirability bias may just be a salience/marking effect, and—although optimism is a robust and ubiquitous human phenomenon—that wishful thinking still remains elusive.
References
Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1988). Depressive realism: Four theoretical perspectives. In L. B. Alloy (Ed.), Cognitive processes in depression (pp. 223–226). New York: Guilford.
Babad, E. (1987). Wishful thinking and objectivity among sports fans. Social Behaviour, 2, 231–240.
Babad, E., & Katz, Y. (1991). Wishful thinking—against all odds. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1921–1938.
Babad, E., & Yacobos, E. (1993). Wish and reality in voters’ predictions of election outcomes. Political Psychology, 14, 37–54.
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2006, August). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Paper presented at the 2005 EFA Annual Meeting, Moscow. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract5460660.
Bar-Hillel, M., & Budescu, D.V. (1995). The elusive wishful thinking effect. Thinking & Reasoning, 1, 71–104.
Bar-Hillel, M., Budescu, D. V., & Amar, M. (2008). Wishful thinking in predicting World Cup results: Still elusive. In J. I. Krueger (Ed.), Rationality and social responsibility: Essays in honor of Robyn Mason Dawes. New York: Psychology Press.
Dhar, R., & Simonson, I. (1992). The effect of the focus of comparison on consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 430–440.
Fischer, I., & Budescu, D. V. (1995). Desirability and hindsight biases in predicting results of a multi-party election. In J.P. Caverni, M. Bar-Hillel, F. H. Barron, & H. Jungermann (Eds.), Contributions to decision making (Vol. 1, pp. 193–211). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Giladi. E. E., & Klar, Y. (2002). When standards are wide off the mark: Nonselective superiority and inferiority biases in comparative judgments of objects and concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 538–551.
Klar, Y. (2002). Way beyond compare: Nonselective superiority and inferiority biases in judging randomly assigned group members relative to their peers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 331–351.
Klein, W. P. (1999). Justifying optimistic predictions with minimally diagnostic information under conditions of outcome dependency. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 21, 177–188.
Koehler, D. J. (1991). Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 499–519.
Krizan, Z., & Windschitl, P. D. (2007a). The influence of outcome desirability on optimism. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 95–121.
Krizan, Z., & Windschitl, P. D. (2007b). Team allegiance can lead to both optimistic and pessimistic predictions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 327–333.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
McKenna, F. P. (1993). It won’t happen to me: Unrealistic optimism or illusion of control? British Journal of Psychology, 84, 39–50.
Price, P. C. (2000). Wishful thinking in the prediction of competitive outcomes. Thinking & Reasoning, 6, 161–172.
Price, P. C., & Marquez, C. A. (2005). Wishful thinking in the predictions of a simple repeatable event: Effects of deterministic versus probabilistic predictions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Pruit, D. G., & Hoge, R. D. (1965). Strength of the relationship between the value of an event and its subjective probability as a function of method of measurement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 483–489.
Shafir, E. (1995). Compatibility in cognition and decision. In J. R. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, & D. L. Medin, (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 32, pp. 247–274). San Diego: Academic Press.
Weinstein, N. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.
Weinstein, N. (1982). Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 5, 441–460.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bar-Hillel, M., Budescu, D.V. & Amar, M. Predicting World Cup results: Do goals seem more likely when they pay off?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 278–283 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.278
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.278