Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting World Cup results: Do goals seem more likely when they pay off?

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bar-Hillel and Budescu (1995) failed to find a desirability bias in probability estimation. The World Cup soccer tournament provided an opportunity to revisit the phenomenon in a context in which desirability biases are notoriously rampant. Participants estimated the probabilities of various teams’ winning their upcoming games. They were promised money if one team—randomly designated by the experimenter—won its upcoming game. Participants assigned a higher probability to a victory by their target team than did other participants, whose promised monetary reward was contingent on the victory of its opponent. Prima facie, this seems to be a desirability bias. However, in a follow-up study that made one team salient, without promising monetary rewards, participants also judged their target team to be more likely to win. On grounds of parsimony, we conclude that what appears to be a desirability bias may just be a salience/marking effect, and—although optimism is a robust and ubiquitous human phenomenon—that wishful thinking still remains elusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1988). Depressive realism: Four theoretical perspectives. In L. B. Alloy (Ed.), Cognitive processes in depression (pp. 223–226). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E. (1987). Wishful thinking and objectivity among sports fans. Social Behaviour, 2, 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E., & Katz, Y. (1991). Wishful thinking—against all odds. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1921–1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E., & Yacobos, E. (1993). Wish and reality in voters’ predictions of election outcomes. Political Psychology, 14, 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2006, August). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Paper presented at the 2005 EFA Annual Meeting, Moscow. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract5460660.

  • Bar-Hillel, M., & Budescu, D.V. (1995). The elusive wishful thinking effect. Thinking & Reasoning, 1, 71–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, M., Budescu, D. V., & Amar, M. (2008). Wishful thinking in predicting World Cup results: Still elusive. In J. I. Krueger (Ed.), Rationality and social responsibility: Essays in honor of Robyn Mason Dawes. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, R., & Simonson, I. (1992). The effect of the focus of comparison on consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 430–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, I., & Budescu, D. V. (1995). Desirability and hindsight biases in predicting results of a multi-party election. In J.P. Caverni, M. Bar-Hillel, F. H. Barron, & H. Jungermann (Eds.), Contributions to decision making (Vol. 1, pp. 193–211). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giladi. E. E., & Klar, Y. (2002). When standards are wide off the mark: Nonselective superiority and inferiority biases in comparative judgments of objects and concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 538–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klar, Y. (2002). Way beyond compare: Nonselective superiority and inferiority biases in judging randomly assigned group members relative to their peers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, W. P. (1999). Justifying optimistic predictions with minimally diagnostic information under conditions of outcome dependency. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 21, 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, D. J. (1991). Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 499–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krizan, Z., & Windschitl, P. D. (2007a). The influence of outcome desirability on optimism. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 95–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krizan, Z., & Windschitl, P. D. (2007b). Team allegiance can lead to both optimistic and pessimistic predictions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, F. P. (1993). It won’t happen to me: Unrealistic optimism or illusion of control? British Journal of Psychology, 84, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, P. C. (2000). Wishful thinking in the prediction of competitive outcomes. Thinking & Reasoning, 6, 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, P. C., & Marquez, C. A. (2005). Wishful thinking in the predictions of a simple repeatable event: Effects of deterministic versus probabilistic predictions. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Pruit, D. G., & Hoge, R. D. (1965). Strength of the relationship between the value of an event and its subjective probability as a function of method of measurement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 483–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafir, E. (1995). Compatibility in cognition and decision. In J. R. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, & D. L. Medin, (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 32, pp. 247–274). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, N. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, N. (1982). Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 5, 441–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David V. Budescu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bar-Hillel, M., Budescu, D.V. & Amar, M. Predicting World Cup results: Do goals seem more likely when they pay off?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 278–283 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.278

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.278

Keywords

Navigation