Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 96–98 | Cite as

Evaluations of pleasurable experiences: The peak-end rule

Brief Reports

Abstract

Prior research suggests that the addition of mild pain to an aversive event may lead people to prefer and directly choose more pain over less pain (Kahneman, Fredrickson, Schreiber, & Redelmeier, 1993). Kahneman et al. suggest that pain ratings are based on a combination of peak pain and final pain. Similarly, people rate a happy life that ends suddenly as being better than one with additional years of mild happiness (Diener, Wirtz, & Oishi, 2001), even though the former objectively consists of less pleasure than the latter. Applying these concepts to material goods, we investigated the impact of positivity and timing on the retrospective evaluations of material goods. We found strong evidence that the peak-end rule applies to both material goods and pain.

References

  1. Baumgartner, H., Sujan, M., & Padgett, D. (1997). Patterns of affective reactions to advertisements: The integration of moment-tomoment responses into overall judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., & Oishi, S. (2001). End effects of rated life quality: The James Dean effect. Psychological Science, 12, 124–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fredrickson, B. L. (2000). Extracting meaning from past affective experiences: The importance of peaks, ends, and specific emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 577–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4, 401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Redelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 66, 3–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Santino, J. (1981). Halloween in America: Contemporary customs and performances. Western Folklore, 41, 1–20.Google Scholar
  8. Schreiber, C. A., & Kahneman, D. (2000). Determinants of the remembered utility of aversive sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 129, 27–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Simonson, I., Carmon, Z., & O’Curry, S. (1994). Experimental evidence on the negative effect of product features and sales promotions on brand choice. Marketing Science, 13, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy M. Do
    • 1
  • Alexander V. Rupert
    • 1
  • George Wolford
    • 1
  1. 1.Dartmouth CollegeHanover

Personalised recommendations