Abstract
When people read narratives, they have ample opportunities to encode mental preferences about characters’ decisions. In our present project, we examined how readers’ preferences for characters’ decisions structure their experiences of story outcomes. In Experiment 1, participants read brief stories and explicitly rated which of two potential decisions they thought the characters should make. The actual decision that each character made was either preferred or nonpreferred by readers. By the end of each story, readers learned whether there was a positive or negative outcome to these decisions. Decisions and outcomes either matched (e.g., a preferred decision followed by a positive outcome) or did not match (e.g., a nonpreferred decision followed by a negative outcome). Participants took longer to read outcome sentences when there was a mismatch. In Experiment 2, we replicated this finding with a task that allowed more natural reading. These results provide converging evidence that readers encode responses to characters’ decisions and that these responses affect the time course with which they assimilate story outcomes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Casteel, M. A. (2007). Contextual support and predictive inferences: What do readers generate and keep available for use? Discourse Processes, 44, 51–72.
Faro, D., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2006). Affect, empathy, and regressive mispredictions of others’ preferences under risk. Management Science, 52, 529–541. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0490
Fincher-Kiefer, R. (1993). The role of predictive inferences in situation model construction. Discourse Processes, 16, 99–124.
Fincher-Kiefer, R., Post, T. A., Greene, T. R., & Voss, J. F. (1988). On the role of prior knowledge and task demands in the processing of text. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 416–428. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90065-4
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Gerrig, R. J., & Jacovina, M. E. (2009). Reader participation in the experience of narrative. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 223–254). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
Griffin, T. D., Jee, B. D., & Wiley, J. (2009). The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1001–1013. doi:10.3758/MC.37.7.1001
Guéraud, S., & O’Brien, E. J. (Eds.) (2005). Components of comprehension: A convergence between memory-based processes and explanation-based processes [Special issue]. Discourse Processes, 39(2–3).
Hadar, L., & Fischer, I. (2008). Giving advice under uncertainty: What you do, what you should do, and what others think you do. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 667–683. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2007.12.007
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136
Lassonde, K. A., & O’Brien, E. J. (2009). Contextual specificity in the activation of predictive inferences. Discourse Processes, 46, 426–438. doi:10.1080/01638530902959620
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1986). Inferences about predictable events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 82–91. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.12.1.82
McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 298–384). San Diego: Academic Press.
O’Brien, T. (1998, September 28). The streak. New Yorker, 88–91.
Peracchi, K. A., & O’Brien, E. J. (2004). Character profiles and the activation of predictive inferences. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1044–1052.
Rapp, D. N., & Gerrig, R. J. (2002). Readers’ reality-driven and plotdriven analyses in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 30, 779–788.
Rapp, D. N., & Gerrig, R. J. (2006). Predilections for narrative outcomes: The impact of story contexts and reader preferences. Journal of Memory & Language, 54, 54–67. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.04.003
Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83, 1178–1197. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178
Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 275–290. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90155-5
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behaviorial & Brain Sciences, 23, 645–665. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00003435
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 15–18. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00004
Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An eventindexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 386–397. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.386
Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Discourse comprehension. In M. A. Gernsbacher & M. J. Traxler (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed.), pp. 725–764). San Diego: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant 0757193.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacovina, M.E., Gerrig, R.J. How readers experience characters’ decisions. Memory & Cognition 38, 753–761 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.6.753
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.6.753