We investigated whether the superior memory performance sometimes seen with delayed rather than immediate feedback was attributable to the shorter retention interval (orlag to test) from the last presentation of the correct information in the delayed condition. Whetherlag to test was controlled or not, delayed feedback produced better final test performance than did immediate feedback, which in turn produced better performance than did no feedback at all, when we tested Grade 6 children learning school-relevant vocabulary. With college students learning GRE-level words, however, delayed feedback produced better performance than did immediate feedback (and both were better than no feedback) when lag to test was uncontrolled, but there was no difference between the delayed and immediate feedback conditions when the lag to test was controlled.
Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., &Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned.Journal of the Learning Sciences,4, 167–207. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2
Anderson, R. C., Kulhavy, R. W., &Andre, T. (1971). Feedback procedures in programmed instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology,62, 148–156. doi:10.1037/h0030766
Bjork, R. A., &Linn, M. C. (2006). The science of learning and the learning of science: Introducing desirable difficulties.APS Observer,19, 29.
Brackbill, Y., Bravos, A., &Starr, R. H. (1962). Delay improved retention on a difficult task.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,55, 947–952. doi:10.1037/h0041561
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., &Roediger, H. L., III (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,13, 273–281. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., &Roediger, H. L., III (2008). Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback enhances retention of low confidence correct responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,34, 918–928. doi:10.1037/0278-7322.214.171.1248
Butler, A. C., &Roediger, H. L., III (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing.Memory & Cognition,36, 604–616. doi:10.3758/MC.36.3.604
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., &Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.Psychological Bulletin,132, 354–380. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
Guzman-Muñoz, F. J., &Johnson, A. (2007). Error feedback and the acquisition of geographical representations.Applied Cognitive Psychology,22, 979–995. doi:10.1002/acp.1410
Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction.Review of Educational Research,47, 211–232. doi:10.2307/1170128
Kulhavy, R. W., &Anderson, R. C. (1972). Delay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests.Journal of Educational Psychology,63, 505–512. doi:10.1037/h0033243
Kulik, J. A, &Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning.Review of Educational Research,58, 79–97. doi:10.2307/ 1170349
Lhyle, K. G., &Kulhavy, R. W. (1987). Feedback processing and error correction.Journal of Educational Psychology,79, 320–322. doi:10.1037/0022-06126.96.36.1990
Metcalfe, J. (2006). Principles of cognitive science in education.APS Observer,19, 29–39.
Metcalfe, J., &Kornell, N. (2007). Principles of cognitive science in education: The effects of generation, errors, and feedback.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,14, 225–229.
Metcalfe, J., Kornell, N., &Son, L. K. (2007). A cognitive-science based programme to enhance study efficacy in a high and low risk setting.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,19, 743–768. doi:10.1080/09541440701326063
Murdock, B. B. (1974).Human memory: Theory and data. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., &Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 3–8. doi:10.1037/0278-73188.8.131.52
Pressey, S. L. (1950). Development and appraisal of devices providing immediate automatic scoring of objective tests and concomitant self-instruction.Journal of Psychology,29, 417–447.
Rohrer, D., &Pashler, H. (2007). Increasing retention without increasing study time.Current Directions in Psychological Science,16, 183–186.
Son, L. K. (2004). Spacing one’s study: Evidence for a metacognitive control strategy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 601–604. doi:10.1037/0278-73184.108.40.2061
Vlach, H. A., Sandhofer, C. M., &Kornell, N. (2008). The spacing effect in children’s memory and category induction.Cognition,109, 163–167. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.013
The research presented here was supported by CASL Grant R305H060161 from the Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of Education, and by Grant 220020166 from the James S. McDonnell Foundation. The authors, however, are wholly responsible for the content of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Metcalfe, J., Kornell, N. & Finn, B. Delayed versus immediate feedback in children’s and adults’ vocabulary learning. Memory & Cognition 37, 1077–1087 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.8.1077
- Correct Answer
- Retention Interval
- Feedback Condition
- Initial Test
- Final Test