Abstract
Understanding a narrative situation depends on keeping track of multiple characters that enter and exit dynamically as the plot unfolds. We investigated age differences in this process during narrative comprehension. In Experiment 1, we used a probe recognition paradigm to examine the effect of age on the accessibility of a previous character when another character was subsequently introduced. In Experiment 2, reading time was measured to examine age differences in the encoding of a new character after another had already been introduced. Our findings show that older readers have particular difficulty both in accessing the initial character after a new character is introduced and in thoroughly encoding a new character while other characters inhabit the discourse world. We attribute these differences to age differences in working memory that make it difficult to access a backgrounded character when a new character is in focus and to distinctively encode a new character when maintenance of another character is already consuming attentional resources.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brown, J. A., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nelson-Denny reading test: Manual for scoring and interpretation, Forms G & H. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368–407.
Christianson, K., Williams, C. C., Zacks, R. T., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Younger and older adults’ “good-enough” interpretations of garden-path sentences. Discourse Processes, 42, 205–238.
Chute, D. L., & Westall, R. F. (1996). Power laboratory. Devon, PA: MacLaboratory.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Copeland, D. E., & Radvansky, G. A. (2007). Aging and integrating spatial mental models. Psychology & Aging, 22, 569–579.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.
Daneman, M., Hannon, B., & Burton, C. (2006). Are there agerelated differences in shallow semantic processing of text? Evidence from eye movements. Discourse Processes, 42, 177–203.
de Vega, M., León, I., & Díaz, J. M. (1996). The representation of changing emotions in reading comprehension. Cognition & Emotion, 10, 303–321.
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2000). Differential roles for visuospatial and verbal working memory in situation model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 61–83.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Group differences in suppression skill. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition, 4, 175–184.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Robertson, R. R. W., Palladino, P., & Werner, N. K. (2004). Managing mental representations during narrative comprehension. Discourse Processes, 37, 145–164.
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gerrig, R. J., & McKoon, G. (2001). Memory processes and experiential continuity. Psychological Science, 12, 81–85.
Hartley, J. T., Stojack, C. C., Mushaney, T. J., Annon, T. A. K., & Lee, D. W. (1994). Reading speed and prose memory in older and younger adults. Psychology & Aging, 9, 216–223.
Johnson, R. E. (2003). Aging and the remembering of text. Developmental Review, 23, 261–346.
Lea, R. B., Mason, R. A., Albrecht, J. E., Birch, S. L., & Myers, J. L. (1998). Who knows what about whom: What role does common ground play in accessing distant information? Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 70–84.
Light, L. L., & Capps, J. L. (1986). Comprehension of pronouns in young and older adults. Developmental Psychology, 22, 580–585.
Linderholm, T., Gernsbacher, M. A., van den Broek, P., Neninde, L., Robertson, R. R. W., & Sundermier, B. (2004). Suppression of story character goals during reading. Discourse Processes, 37, 67–78.
Morrow, D. G., Altieri, P. A., & Leirer, V. O. (1992). Aging, narrative organization, presentation mode, and referent choice strategies. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 75–84.
Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 165–187.
Morrow, D. G., Leirer, V. O., & Altieri, P. A. (1992). Aging, expertise, and narrative processing. Psychology & Aging, 7, 376–388.
Morrow, D. G., Leirer, V. O., Altieri, P. A., & Fitzsimmons, P. (1994). Age differences in updating situation models from narratives. Language & Cognitive Processes, 9, 203–220.
Noh, S. R., Shake, M. C., Parisi, J. M., Joncich, A. D., Morrow, D. G., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2007). Age differences in learning from text: The effects of content preexposure on reading. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 133–148.
Radvansky, G. A. (1999). Aging, memory, and comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 49–53.
Radvansky, G. A., & Curiel, J. M. (1998). Narrative comprehension and aging: The fate of completed goal information. Psychology & Aging, 13, 69–79.
Radvansky, G. A., Curiel, J. M., Zwaan, R. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2001). Situation models and aging. Psychology & Aging, 16, 145–160.
Radvansky, G. A., & Dijkstra, K. (2007). Aging and situation model processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1027–1042.
Rapp, D. N., & van den Broek, P. (2005). Dynamic text comprehension: An integrative view of reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 276–279.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Lustig, C. (2005). Brain aging: Reorganizing discoveries about the aging mind. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 245–251.
Rinck, M., & Bower, G. H. (2000). Temporal and spatial distance in situation models. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1310–1320.
Rinck, M., & Weber, U. (2003). Who when where: An experimental test of the event-indexing model. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1284–1292.
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.
Shake, M. C., Noh, S. R., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2009). Age differences in the effects of conceptual integration training on resource allocation in sentence processing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 561–578.
Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1144–1150.
Soederberg, L. M., & Stine, E. A. L. (1995). Activation of emotion information in text among younger and older adults. Journal of Adult Development, 2, 23–36.
Stine, E. A. L. (1990). On-line processing of written text by younger and older adults. Psychology & Aging, 5, 68–78.
Stine, E. A. L., & Hindman, J. (1994). Age differences in reading time allocation for propositionally dense sentences. Aging & Cognition, 1, 2–16.
Stine, E. A. L., Soederberg, L. M., & Morrow, D. G. (1996). Language and discourse processing through adulthood. In F. Blanchard-Fields & T. M. Hess (Eds.), Perspectives on cognition in adulthood and aging (pp. 255–290). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Miller, L. M. S., Gagne, D. D., & Hertzog, C. (2008). Self-regulated reading in adulthood. Psychology & Aging, 23, 131–153.
Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Miller, L. M. S., & Hertzog, C. (2006). Aging and self-regulated language processing. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 582–606.
Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Morrow, D. G., & Leno, R., III (2002). Aging and the representation of spatial situations in narrative understanding. Journals of Gerontology, 57B, P291-P297.
Therriault, D. J., Rinck, M., & Zwaan, R. A (2006). Assessing the influence of dimensional focus during situation model construction. Memory & Cognition, 34, 78–89.
Thornton, R., & Light, L. L. (2006). Language comprehension and production in normal aging. In J. E. Birren & K.W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (6th ed., pp. 129–161). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132.
van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316.
Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised (7th ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser. A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 386–397.
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.
Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Discourse comprehension. In M. A. Gernsbacher & M. A. Traxler (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 725–764). San Diego: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Noh, S.R., Stine-Morrow, E.A.L. Age differences in tracking characters during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition 37, 769–778 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.6.769
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.6.769