Abstract
Since the early days of psychology, researchers have investigated whether or not intending to remember information affects subsequent memory performance. The literature contains methodological issues and empirical contradictions, with ambiguous effects. In five experiments, a total of 576 participants viewed a rapid series of pictorial stimuli under either incidental- or intentional-memory conditions. Although the methodology was stringent, intent to remember consistently enhanced recognition memory. Recognition was enhanced even when participants viewed a picture of a human face, of an ape face, or of a bird for as little as 0.5-1.0 sec, with no interstimulus interval between it and the next picture. Rehearsal, depth of processing, and attentional allocation are discussed to explain how people might intentionally encode pictorial information to enhance their subsequent recognition memory performance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bower, G. H., & Karlin, M. B. (1974). Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 751–757.
Bruce, V. (1988). Recognising faces. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Carmel, D., & Bentin, S. (2002). Domain specificity versus expertise: Factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition, 83, 1–29.
Coin, C., & Tiberghien, G. (1997). Encoding activity and face recognition. Memory, 5, 545–568.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
Craik, F. I. M., Özçelik, E., & Luo, L. (2008, November). Is “shortterm consolidation” simply “deep processing?” Paper presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 9.
Eagle, M., & Leiter, E. (1964). Recall and recognition in intentional and incidental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 58–63.
Ellis, H. D., & Young, A. W. (1989). Are faces special? In A. W. Young & H. D. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of research on face processing (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Estes, W. K., & Da Polito, F. (1967). Independent variation of information storage and retrieval processes in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 18–26.
Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is “special” about face perception? Psychological Review, 105, 482–498.
Gauthier, I., & Logothetis, N. K. (2000). Is face recognition not so unique after all? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 125–142.
Gauthier, I., & Nelson, C. A. (2001). The development of face expertise. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 219–224.
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356–388.
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1984). Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence. American Psychologist, 39, 1372–1388.
Hintzman, D. L., & Rogers, M. K. (1973). Spacing effects in picture memory. Memory & Cognition, 1, 430–434.
Hyde, T. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1973). Recall for words as a function of semantic, graphic, and syntactic orienting tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 471–480.
InterQuest (1998). FACES: The ultimate composite picture (Version 3.0) [Computer software]. Saint-Hubert, Quebec, Canada: Author.
Lewin, C., & Herlitz, A. (2002). Sex differences in face recognition— Women’s faces make the difference. Brain & Cognition, 50, 121–128.
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490.
Marmie, W. R., & Healy, A. F. (2004). Memory for common objects: Brief intentional study is sufficient to overcome poor recall of US coin features. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 445–453.
Meumann, E. (1913). The psychology of learning: An experimental in-vestigation of the economy and technique of memory (J. W. Baird, Trans.) (3rd ed.). New York: Appleton.
Neill, W. T., Beck, J. L., Bottalico, K. S., & Molloy, R. D. (1990). Effects of intentional versus incidental learning on explicit and implicit tests of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 457–463.
Neimark, E., & Saltzman, I. J. (1953). Intentional and incidental learning with different rates of stimulus-presentation. American Journal of Psychology, 66, 618–621.
Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2007). Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact. Neuropsychologia, 45, 75–92.
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Postman, L. (1964). Short-term memory and incidental learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning (pp. 145–201). New York: Academic Press.
Postman, L., & Phillips, L. W. (1954). Studies in incidental learning: I. The effects of crowding and isolation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 48–56.
Rakover, S. S. (2002). Featural vs. configurational information in faces: A conceptual and empirical analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 1–30.
Rakover, S. S., & Cahlon, B. (2001). Face recognition: Cognitive and computational processes. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Read, J. D. (1979). Rehearsal and recognition of human faces. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 71–85.
Reeves, A., & Sperling, G. (1986). Attention gating in short-term visual memory. Psychological Review, 93, 180–206.
Saltzman, I. J. (1953). The orienting task in incidental and intentional learning. American Journal of Psychology, 66, 593–597.
Saltzman, I. J., & Atkinson, R. L. (1954). Comparisons of incidental and intentional learning after different numbers of stimulus presentations. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 521–524.
Saltzman, I. J., & Carterette, T. S. (1959). Incidental and intentional learning of isolated and crowded items. American Journal of Psychology, 72, 230–235.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.
Shaffer, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1972). Rehearsal and storage of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 292–296.
Shellow, S. M. (1923). Individual differences in incidental memory. Archives of Psychology, 10(Whole No. 64).
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring rec ognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.
Tversky, B., & Sherman, T. (1975). Picture memory improves with longer on time and off time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 1, 114–118.
Watkins, M. J., & Graefe, T. M. (1981). Delayed rehearsal of pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 276–288.
Weaver, G. E. (1974). Effects of poststimulus study time on recognition of pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 799–801.
Willingham, D. T. (2007). Cognition: The thinking animal (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Young, A. W. (Ed.) (1998). Face and mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zechmeister, E. B., & Nyberg, S. E. (1982). Human memory: An introduction to research and theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Block, R.A. Intent to remember briefly presented human faces and other pictorial stimuli enhances recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 37, 667–678 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.5.667
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.5.667