Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Memory & Cognition
  3. Article
Investigations in spontaneous discounting
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Does choice change preferences? An incentivized test of the mere choice effect

15 August 2021

Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Georg D. Granic

An inquiry into the nature and causes of the Description - Experience gap

25 October 2022

Robin Cubitt, Orestis Kopsacheilis & Chris Starmer

Gain–Loss Asymmetry in Experiential Probability Discounting

05 February 2020

Rana Asgarova, Anne C. Macaskill & Maree J. Hunt

Individual discount rates: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence

06 May 2021

Jindrich Matousek, Tomas Havranek & Zuzana Irsova

On the role of exploitation and exploration strategies in the maintenance of cognitive biases: Beyond the pursuit of instrumental rewards

24 January 2023

Jakob Kasper, Klaus Fiedler, … Chris Harris

Propping up the causal theory

14 March 2022

Peter Langland-Hassan

Pragmatic, constructive, and reconstructive memory influences on the hindsight bias

11 August 2022

Karolin Salmen, Florian K. G. Ermark & Klaus Fiedler

Responsibility for Forgetting To Do

22 April 2022

Thor Grünbaum

The intrinsic variance of beauty judgment

14 March 2023

Maria Pombo, Aenne A. Brielmann & Denis G. Pelli

Download PDF
  • Published: July 2009

Investigations in spontaneous discounting

  • Daniel M. Oppenheimer1 &
  • Benoît Monin2 

Memory & Cognition volume 37, pages 608–614 (2009)Cite this article

  • 600 Accesses

  • 10 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Oppenheimer’s (2004) demonstration that causal discounting (when the presence of one cause casts doubt on the presence of another) can happen spontaneously addressed the standing concern that discounting was an artifact of experimental demands, but these results could have resulted from memory inhibition. The present studies rule out this alternative using the same surname frequency estimation paradigm. In Study 1, individuals discounted surname familiarity even when it could be attributed to semantic meaning; in Study 2, participants under cognitive load discounted less; in Study 3, participants who were promised a prize for accuracy discounted more. All three results conform to a spontaneous causal discounting account better than to the inhibition alternative.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

References

  • Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Anderson, M. C., & Bjork, R. A. (1994). Mechanisms of inhibition in long-term memory: A new taxonomy. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 265–325). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Sufficient and necessary conditions in dual process models: The case of mood and information processing. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 423–440). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1986). Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elig, T. W., & Frieze, I. H. (1979). Measuring causal attributions for success and failure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 18, 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 733–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, R. D., & Hall, C. A. (1985). Discounting and augmenting facilitative and inhibitory forces: The winner takes almost all. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 49, 1482–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, D. (1995). The social content of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 248–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. J., Häubl, G., & Keinan, A. (2007). Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kun, A., Murray, J., & Sredl, K. (1980). Misuses of the multiple sufficient causal scheme as a model of naive attributions: A case of mistaken identity. Developmental Psychology, 16, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalljee, M., Watson, M., & White, P. (1982). Explanations, attributions and the social context of unexpected behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B. J., & Anderson, M. C. (2002). Inhibitory processes and the control of memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 299–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClure, J. (1998). Discounting of causes of behavior: Are two reasons better than one? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. D., Smith, E. R., & Uleman, J. (1981). Measurement and interpretation of situational and dispositional attributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 80–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. W., & Larrick, R. P. (1995). When one cause casts doubt on another: A normative analysis of discounting in causal attribution. Psychological Review, 102, 331–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research. Memory & Cognition, 12, 531–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, D. M. (2004). Spontaneous discounting of availability in frequency judgment tasks. Psychological Science, 15, 100–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: Problems with using long words needlessly. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, D. M., & Frank, M. F. (2007). A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: Effects of perceptual fluency on categorization. Cognition, 106, 1178–1194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, D. M., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Krynski, T. (2009). Categorization as causal explanation: Discounting and augmenting in a Bayesian framework. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Read, S. J. (1987). Constructing causal scenarios: A knowledge structure approach to causal reasoning. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 52, 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, S. J., & Marcus-Newhall, A. (1993). Explanatory coherence in social explanations: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield, D., & Stephan, W. G. (1977). When discounting fails: An unexpected finding. Memory & Cognition, 5, 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (2004). Meta-cognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Kemp, C. (2006). Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 309–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Riecken, H. W. (1955). Some determinants and consequences of the perception of social causality. Journal of Personality, 24, 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau (2002). Genealogy name search. Available at www.census.gov/genealogy/www/namesearch.html.

  • Wimer, S., & Kelley, H. H. (1982). An investigation of the dimensions of causal attribution. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 43, 1142–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Green Hall, 08540, Princeton, NJ

    Daniel M. Oppenheimer

  2. Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

    Benoît Monin

Authors
  1. Daniel M. Oppenheimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benoît Monin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel M. Oppenheimer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oppenheimer, D.M., Monin, B. Investigations in spontaneous discounting. Memory & Cognition 37, 608–614 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.5.608

Download citation

  • Received: 21 September 2008

  • Accepted: 18 February 2009

  • Issue Date: July 2009

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.5.608

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Cognitive Load
  • Causal Attribution
  • Semantic Meaning
  • Causal Reasoning
  • Frequency Judgment
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 3.238.134.157

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.