Abstract
Despite previous findings, Klin, Ralano, and Weingartner (2007) found transfer benefits across unrelated passages. After processing an ambiguous phrase in Story A that was biased toward its sarcastic meaning, readers were more likely to interpret the identical phrase in Story B as sarcastic, even though it contained no disambiguating information. In the present experiments, we found both repetition effects (a benefit for the lexical items) and meaning selection effects (a benefit for the selected meaning of the phrase) with short delays between Stories A and B; with longer delays, only repetition effects were found. Whereas decreasing the elaboration of the phrase eliminated both effects, moving the disambiguating context from before to after the phrase eliminated meaning selection effects only. We conclude that meaning selection effects, which are based on conceptual overlap, are more sensitive to context changes and less robust than repetition effects, which are based on both perceptual and conceptual overlap.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1998). Accessing distant text information during reading: Effects of contextual cues. Discourse Processes, 26, 87–107.
Alexander, J. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2008). Reading voices and hearing text: Talker-specific auditory imagery in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 446–459. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.446
Besson, M., & Kutas, M. (1993). The many facets of repetition: A cued-recall and event related potential analysis of repeating words in same versus different sentence contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1115–1133. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1115
Binder, K. S., & Morris, R. K. (1995). Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: Effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1186–1196. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1115
Carr, T. H., & Brown, J. S. (1990). Perceptual abstraction and interactivity in repeated oral reading: Where do things stand? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 731–738. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.731
Carr, T. H., Brown, J. S., & Charalambous, A. (1989). Repetition and reading: Perceptual encoding mechanisms are very abstract but not very interactive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 763–778. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.763
Collins, W. M., & Levy, B. A. (2007). Text repetition and text integration. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1557–1566.
Duffy, S. A., Kambe, G., & Rayner, K. (2001). The effect of prior disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 27–43). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10459-002
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Robertson, R. R. W., & Werner, N. K. (2001). The costs and benefits of meaning. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 119–137). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10459-007
Gibbs, R. W. (1990). Comprehending figurative referential descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 56–66. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.56
Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1–67. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.1
Gorfein, D. S. (2001). An activation-selection view of homograph dis ambiguation: A matter of emphasis? In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 157–173). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10459-009
Gorfein, D. S., Berger, S., & Bubka, A. (2000). The selection of homograph meaning: Word associations when context changes. Memory & Cognition, 28, 766–773.
Gorfein, D. S., & Brown, V. R. (2007). Saying no to inhibition: The encoding and use of words. In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 103–124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11587-006
Gruppuso, V., Lindsay, D. S., & Masson, M. E. J. (2007). I’d know that face anywhere! Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1085–1089.
Hayman, C. A. G., & Jacoby, L. L. (1989). Specific word transfer as a measure of processing in the word-superiority paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 17, 125–133.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.4.411
Jacoby, L. L., Baker, J. G., & Brooks, L. (1989). Episodic effects on picture identification: Implications for theories of concept learning and theories of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 275–281. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.2.275
Klin, C. M., Ralano, A. S., & Weingartner, K. M. (2007). Repeating phrases across unrelated narratives: Evidence of text repetition effects. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1588–1599.
Klin, C. M., Weingartner, K. M., Guzmán, A. E., & Levine, W. H. (2004). Readers’ sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: How salience influences anaphor resolution. Memory & Cognition, 32, 511–522.
Kolers, P. A. (1976). Reading a year later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 554–565. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.2.5.554
Levy, B. A., & Burns, K. I. (1990). Reprocessing text: Contributions from conceptually driven processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 465–482. doi:10.1037/h0084265
Levy, B. A., Campsall, J., Browne, J., Cooper, D., Waterhouse, C., & Wilson, C. (1995). Reading fluency: Episodic integration across texts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1169–1185. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.5.1169
Levy, B. A., & Kirsner, K. (1989). Reprocessing text: Indirect measures of word and message level processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 407–417. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.407
MacLeod, C. M. (1989). Word context during initial exposure influences degree of priming in word fragment completion task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 398–406. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.398
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252–271. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.252
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1995). The minimalist hypothesis: Directions for research. In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 97–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mitchell, D. B. (2006). Nonconscious priming after 17 years: Invulnerable implicit memory? Psychological Science, 17, 925–929. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01805.x
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165–178. doi:10.1037/h0027366
Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157.
Oliphant, G. W. (1983). Repetition and recency effects in word recognition. Australian Journal of Psychology, 35, 393–403. doi:10.1080/00049538308258751
Onishi, K. H., & Murphy, G. L. (1993). Metaphoric reference: When metaphors are not understood as easily as literal expressions. Memory & Cognition, 21, 763–772.
Raney, G. E. (2003). A context-dependent representation model for explaining text repetition effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 15–28.
Raney, G. E., & Rayner, K. (1995). Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 151–172.
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108. doi:10.1037/1196-1961.49.2.151
Simpson, G. B., & Kang, H. (1994). Inhibitory processes in the recognition of homograph meanings. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 359–381). New York: Academic Press.
Sloman, S. A., Hayman, C. A. G., Ohta, N., Law, J., & Tulving, E. (1988). Forgetting in primed fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 223–239. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.2.223
Swinney, D. (1981). Lexical processing during sentence comprehension: Effects of higher order constraints and implications for representation. In T. Myers, J. Laver, & J. M. Anderson (Eds.), The cognitive representation of speech (pp. 201–210). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Tenpenny, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 339–363.
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301–306. doi:10.1126/science.2296719
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Portions of these data were reported at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Minneapolis, MN.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klin, C.M., Drumm, A.M. & Ralano, A.S. Repeated text in unrelated passages: Repetition versus meaning selection effects. Memory & Cognition 37, 556–568 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.5.556
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.5.556