Abstract
In this study, we investigated whether semantic properties of a word’s orthographic neighbors are activated during visual word recognition. In two experiments, words were presented with a property that was not true for the word itself. We manipulated whether the property was true for an orthographic neighbor of the word. Our results showed that rejection of the property was slower and less accurate when the property was true for a neighbor than when the property was not true for a neighbor. These findings indicate that semantic information is activated before orthographic processing is finished. The present results are problematic for the links model (Forster, 2006; Forster & Hector, 2002) that was recently proposed in order to bring form-first models of visual word recognition into line with previously reported findings (Forster & Hector, 2002; Pecher, Zeelenberg, & Wagenmakers, 2005; Rodd, 2004).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Becker, S., Moscovitch, M., Behrmann, M., & Joordens, S. (1997). Long-term semantic priming: A computational account and empirical evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1059–1082.
Boot, I., & Pecher, D. (2008). Word recognition is affected by the meaning of orthographic neighbours: Evidence from semantic decision tasks. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 375–393.
Bourassa, D. C., & Besner, D. (1998). When do nonwords activate semantics? Implications for models of visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26, 61–74.
Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a “hat” in “that”? Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 131–143.
Duñabeitia, J. A., Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2008). Are coffee and toffee served in a cup? Ortho-phonologically mediated associative priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1861–1872.
Forster, K. I. (2006). Early activation of category information in visual word recognition: More on the turple effect. The Mental Lexicon, 1, 35–58.
Forster, K. I., & Hector, J. (2002). Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: The turple effect. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1106–1117.
Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2002). Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 686–713.
Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 3–23.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
Pecher, D. (2001). Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 545–551.
Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2005). Enemies and friends in the neighborhood: Orthographic similarity effects in semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 121–128.
Pexman, P. M., & Lupker, S. J. (1999). Ambiguity and visual word recognition: Can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 323–334.
Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., & Hino, Y. (2002). The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 542–549.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2003). A further look at the “language-as-fixedeffect fallacy.” Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 141–151.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with “the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 416–426.
Rodd, J. M. (2004). When do leotards get their spots? Semantic activation of lexical neighbors in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 434–439.
Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 337–359.
Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1269–1291.
Ziegler, J. C., Montant, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 533–554.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) to D.P.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pecher, D., de Rooij, J. & Zeelenberg, R. Does a pear growl? Interference from semantic properties of orthographic neighbors. Memory & Cognition 37, 541–546 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.5.541
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.5.541