Skip to main content

The effect of repetition and similarity on sequence learning

Abstract

Repetition is a pervasive feature of children’s environments, and may be an important contributor to learning such complex sequential structures as language. Endress, Dehaene-Lambertz, and Mehler (2007) found that repeated tone sequences were learned more easily than sequences containing ordinal relations, but there have been no direct comparisons of repeating sequences versus sequences that contain similar, but not identical, stimuli. In Experiment 1, we compared learning from repeating tone sequences to learning from tones that varied in similarity, and confirmed that repetition is a special case for learning. In Experiment 2 we showed that the learning distinction between repeated and similar elements is not affected by whether similarity is variable. We conclude by indicating that repetition provides an important constraint on learning, and we discuss the extent to which such constraints are consistent with general-purpose statistical learning mechanisms.

References

  1. Altmann, G. T. M. (2002). Learning and development in neural networks— the importance of prior experience. Cognition, 85, B43-B50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonatti, L. L., Peña, M., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2005). Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: The role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing. Psychological Science, 16, 451–459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Botvinick, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2006). Short-term memory for serial order: A recurrent neural network model. Psychological Review, 113, 201–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Endress, A. D., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Mehler, J. (2007). Perceptual constraints and the learnability of simple grammars. Cognition, 105, 577–614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gómez, R. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13, 431–436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris, R. W. (1985). Perceived relatedness of musical tones in major and minor tonal contexts. American Journal of Psychology, 98, 605–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Item repetition in short-term memory: Ranschburg repeated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1162–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 79, 2554–2558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kohonen, T. (1988). The “neural” phonetic typewriter. Computer, 21, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Rao, S. B., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 127–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nyquist (www.cs.cmu.edu/~music/nyquist/). Retrieved May 6, 2007. Onnis, L., Christiansen, M. H., Chater, N., & Gómez, R. (2003). Reduction of uncertainty in human sequential learning: Evidence from artificial grammar learning. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  14. Onnis, L., Monaghan, P., Richmond, K., & Chater, N. (2005). Phonology impacts segmentation in online speech processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Papousek, M., Papousek, H., & Haekel, M. (1987). Didactic adjustments in fathers’ and mothers’ speech to their 3-month-old infants. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 491–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peña, M., Bonatti, L. L., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2002). Signaldriven computations in speech processing. Science, 298, 604–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pothos, E. M., & Bailey, T. M. (2000). The importance of similarity in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 847–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 110–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Padraic Monaghan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Monaghan, P., Rowson, C. The effect of repetition and similarity on sequence learning. Memory & Cognition 36, 1509–1514 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.8.1509

Download citation

Keywords

  • Repetition Blindness
  • Artificial Grammar Learning
  • Identical Repetition
  • Recurrent Neural Network Model
  • Ordinal Sequence