Abstract
Using synthetic faces that varied along four perceptual dimensions (Wilson, Loffler, & Wilkinson, 2002), we examined the effects of face similarity on memory for face-name associations. The nature of these stimuli allowed us to go beyond the categorical similarity manipulations used in previous verbal associative memory studies to trace out the parametric relation between similarity and various performance measures. In Experiment 1, we found that recall performance diminished as a function of how many studied faces were in the vicinity of the cue face in similarity space. Also, incorrect recalls were more likely to come from nearby positions in face space. Experiments 2 and 3, respectively, demonstrated analogous effects with a set of more distinguishable, photorealistic faces, and in an associative recognition task. These results highlight the similarity between associative recall and associative recognition, and between face-name association and other domains of associative memory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bogacz, R., Brown, M. W., & Giraud-Carrier, C. (2001). Model of familiarity discrimination in the perirhinal cortex. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 10, 5–23.
Bower, G. H., Thompson-Schill, S., & Tulving, E. (1994). Reducing retroactive interference: An interference analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 51–66.
Busey, T. A., & Tunnicliff, J. L. (1999). Accounts of blending, distinctiveness, and typicality in the false recognition of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1210–1235.
Criss, A. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1284–1297.
Dyne, A. M., Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., & Pike, R. (1990). Associative interference effects in recognition and recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 813–824.
Feldman, S. M., & Underwood, B. J. (1957). Stimulus recall following paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 11–15.
Fraas, M., Lockwood, J., Neils-Strunjas, J., Shidler, M., Krikorian, R., & Weiler, E. (2002). “What’s his name?” A comparison of elderly participants’ and undergraduate students’ misnamings. Archives of Gerontology & Geriatrics, 34, 155–165.
Ganel, T., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (2002). Perceptual integrality of sex and identity of faces: Further evidence for the single-route hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 854–867.
Geller, A. S., Schleifer, I. K., Sederberg, P. B., Jacobs, J., & Kahana, M. J. (2007). PyEPL: A cross-platform experiment-programming library. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 950–958.
Gibson, E. J. (1940). A systematic application of the concepts of generalization and differentiation to verbal learning. Psychological Review, 47, 196–229.
Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1–67.
Goshen-Gottstein, Y., & Ganel, T. (2000). Repetition priming for familiar and unfamiliar faces in a sex-judgment task: Evidence for a common route for the processing of sex and identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1198–1214.
Habak, C., Wilkinson, F., & Wilson, H. R. (2008). Aging disrupts the neural transformations that link facial identity across views. Vision Research, 48, 9–15.
Hintzman, D. L. (1984). Minerva 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16, 96–101.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528–551.
Hockley, W. E. (2008). Memory search: A matter of time. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (Vol. 2, pp. 417-444). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., & Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208–233.
Humphreys, M. S., Pike, R., Bain, J. D., & Tehan, G. (1989). Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 36–67.
Kahana, M. J. (in press). Foundations of human memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kahana, M. J., & Bennett, P. J. (1994). Classification and perceived similarity of compound gratings that differ in relative spatial phase. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 642–656.
Kahana, M. J., Rizzuto, D. S., & Schneider, A. (2005). Theoretical correlations and measured correlations: Relating recognition and recall in four distributed memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 933–953.
Kahana, M. J., & Sekuler, R. (2002). Recognizing spatial patterns: A noisy exemplar approach. Vision Research, 42, 2177–2192.
Keppel, G. (1968). Retroactive and proactive inhibition. In T. R. Dixon & D. L. Horton (Eds.), Verbal behavior and general behavior theory (pp. 172–213). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Knapp, B. R., Nosofsky, R. M., & Busey, T. A. (2006). Recognizing distinctive faces: A hybrid-similarity exemplar model account. Memory & Cognition, 34, 877–889.
Lea, M. A., Thomas, R. D., Lamkin, N. A., & Bell, A. (2007). Who do you look like? Evidence for facial stereotypes for male names. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 901–907.
Lee, M. D. (2001). Determining the dimensionality of multidimensional scaling representations for cognitive modeling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 149–166.
Levitt, H., & Goss, A. E. (1961). Stimulus attributes and drive in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 243–252.
Loffler, G., Yourganov, G., Wilkinson, F., & Wilson, H. R. (2005). fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1386–1390.
McGeoch, J. A. (1942). The psychology of human learning: An introduction. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.
Monaco, J. D., Abbott, L. F., & Kahana, M. J. (2007). Lexicosemantic structure and the word-frequency effect in recognition memory. Learning & Memory, 14, 204–213.
Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609–626.
Murdock, B. B. (1989). Learning in a distributed memory model. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowerree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 69–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Murdock, B. B. (1992). Item and associative information in a distributed memory model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 68–99.
Nelson, D. L., Bajo, M., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1989). Prior knowledge: The effects of natural category size on memory for implicitly encoded concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 957–967.
Nelson, D. L., McKinney, V. M., Gee, N. R., & Janczura, G. A. (1998). Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition. Psychological Review, 105, 299–324.
Newman, S. E., & Buckhout, R. (1962). S-R and R-S learning as functions of intralist similarity. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 429–436.
Nobel, P. A., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 384–413.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 3–27.
Osgood, C. E. (1949). The similarity paradox in human learning. Psychological Review, 56, 132–143.
O’Toole, A. J., Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1998). Stimulusspecific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpoint. Vision Research, 38, 2351–2363.
Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). Episodic and semantic organization during free recall: The control of memory search. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Postman, L. (1976). Interference theory revisited. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition. London: Wiley.
Rizzuto, D. S., & Kahana, M. J. (2001). An autoassociative neural network model of paired-associate learning. Neural Computation, 13, 2075–2092.
Robinson, E. S. (1927). The “similarity” factor in retroaction. American Journal of Psychology, 39, 297–312.
Sammon, J. W. (1969). A nonlinear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-18, 401–409.
Sederberg, P. B., Gauthier, L. V., Terushkin, V., Miller, J. F., Barnathan, J. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2006). Oscillatory correlates of the primacy effect in episodic memory. NeuroImage, 32, 1422–1431.
Sinha, P., Balas, B., Ostrovsky, Y., & Russell, R. (2006). Face recognition by humans: Nineteen results all computer vision researchers should know about. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94, 1948–1962.
Skaggs, E. B. (1925). Further studies in retroactive inhibition. Psychological Monographs, 34, 1–60.
Takane, Y., Young, F. W., & de Leeuw, J. (1977). Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika, 42, 7–67.
Underwood, B. J. (1953). Studies of distributed practice: VIII. Learning and retention of paired nonsense syllables as a function of intralist similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 133–142.
Underwood, B. J. (1969). Some correlates of item repetition in freerecall learning. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 83–94.
van Vugt, M. K., Sekuler, R., Wilson, H. R., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). Distinct electrophysiological correlates of proactive and similarity-based interference in visual working memory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Verde, M. F., & Rotello, C. M. (2004). Strong memories obscure weak memories in associative recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1062–1066.
Wilson, H. R., Loffler, G., & Wilkinson, F. (2002). Synthetic faces, face cubes, and the geometry of face space. Vision Research, 42, 2909–2923.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 25, 747–763.
Yotsumoto, Y., Kahana, M. J., Wilson, H. R., & Sekuler, R. (2007). Recognition memory for realistic synthetic faces. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1233–1244.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pantelis, P.C., van Vugt, M.K., Sekuler, R. et al. Why are some people’s names easier to learn than others? The effects of face similarity on memory for face-name associations. Memory & Cognition 36, 1182–1195 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1182
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1182