Advertisement

Memory & Cognition

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 1144–1150 | Cite as

When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind

  • Jonathan Smallwood
  • Merrill McSpadden
  • Jonathan W. Schooler
Article

Abstract

Attention plays an essential role in the construction of the mental models necessary to make sense of ongoing events. In this article, we consider the implications of temporary inattention during reading for the construction and updating of the situation model during text comprehension. We examined how self-reported mind wandering during reading relates to the online construction of the situation model of the narrative, which in this case involved the pseudonym used by a villain in a detective novella. In successful readers, mind wandering without awareness, referred to as zoning out, was less frequent when the text revealed a clue about the villain’s identity. Additional analyses indicated that mind wandering interfered with the construction of the situation model independent of the participants’ ability to retrieve factual information. The analysis of the temporal consequences of zoning out indicated that lapses had the greatest influence when they occurred early in the narrative. These results confirm the intuition that zoning out during reading is an indication that the construction of the situation model has gone awry, and underscore the fact that our ability to understand ongoing events depends on the ability to pay attention when it matters.

Keywords

Situation Model Text Comprehension Attention Matter Mind Wandering Curious Incident 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Buckner, R. L., & Vincent, J. L. (2007). Unrest at rest: Default network activity and spontaneous network correlations. NeuroImage, 37, 1091–1097.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chafe, W. L. (1979). The flow of thought and language. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and syntax (pp. 159–181). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Conan-Doyle, A. (2001a). Adventures of Sherlock Holmes. In E. Glinert (Ed.), The adventures and memoirs of Sherlock Holmes. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1892)Google Scholar
  4. Conan-Doyle, A. (2001b). Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes. In E. Glinert (Ed.), The adventures and memoirs of Sherlock Holmes. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1894)Google Scholar
  5. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 11, 357–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garnham, A., Garrod, S., & Sanford, A. (2006). Observations on the past and future of psycholinguistics. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 430–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerrig, R. J., & O’Brien, E. J. (2005). The scope of memory-based processing. Discourse Processes, 39, 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Givón, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 30, 5–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). Structure and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  13. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kane, M. J., Brown, L. H., McVay, J. C., Silvia, P. J., Myin-Germeys, I., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when: An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18, 614–621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kramer, A. F., & Strayer, D. L. (1988). Assessing the development of automatic processing: An application of dual-task and event-related potential methodologies. Biological Psychology, 26, 231–267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Wandering minds: The default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science, 315, 393–395.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McCrudden, M. T., Schraw, G., & Kambe, G. (2005). The effect of relevance instructions on reading time and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McKiernan, K. A., D’Angelo, B. R., Kaufman, J. N., & Binder, J. R. (2006). Interrupting the “stream of consciousness”: An fMRI investigation. NeuroImage, 29, 1185–1191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. McKoon, G., Gerrig, R., & Greene, S. B. (1996). Pronoun resolution without pronouns: The consequences of memory-based text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 919–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Brien, E. J., Albrecht, J. E., Hakala, C. M., & Rizzella, M. L. (1995). Activation and suppression of antecedents during reinstatement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 626–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 16, 676–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Reichle, E., Morales, F. J., Laurent, P., Halpern, D., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). The monitoring and consequences of mind wandering during reading. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  28. Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., & Yiend, J. (1997). “Oops!” Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Schacter, D. L. (2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  30. Schooler, J. W. (2002). Re-representing consciousness: Dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 339–344.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schooler, J. W., Reichle, E. D., & Halpern, D. V. (2005). Zoning-out during reading: Evidence for dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. In D. T. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 203–226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Seibert, P. S., & Ellis, H. C. (1991). Irrelevant thoughts, emotional mood states, and cognitive task performance. Memory & Cognition, 19, 507–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smallwood, J., Baracaia, S. F., Lowe, M., & Obonsawin, M. C. (2003). Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information. Consciousness & Cognition, 12, 452–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smallwood, J., Beach, E., Schooler, J. W., & Handy, T. C. (2008). Going AWOL in the brain: Mind wandering reduces cortical analysis of external events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 458–469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Smallwood, J., Davies, J. B., Heim, D., Finnigan, F., Sudberry, M. V., O’Connor, R. C., & Obonsawin, M. C. (2004). Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention. Consciousness & Cognition, 13, 657–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smallwood, J., Fishman, D. J., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). Counting the cost of an absent mind: Mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 230–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). The lights are on but no one’s home: Meta-awareness and the decoupling of attention when the mind wanders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 527–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smallwood, J., O’Connor, R. C., Sudberry, M. V., & Obonsawin, M. C. (2007). Mind wandering and dysphoria. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 816–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946–958.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Stine, E. A. L., & Wingfield, A. (1990). How much do working memory deficits contribute to age differences in discourse memory? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Miller, L. M. S., & Hertzog, C. (2006). Aging and self-regulated language processing. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 582–606.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Van den Broek, P., Virtue, S., Eversen, M. G., Tzeng, Y., & Sung, Y. (2002). Comprehension and memory of science texts: Inferential processes and the construction of a mental representation. In J. Otero, J. A. León, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 131–154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Wickens, C., Kramer, A., Vanasse, L., & Donchin, E. (1983). Performance of concurrent tasks: A psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. Science, 221, 1080–1082.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An eventindexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Smallwood
    • 1
  • Merrill McSpadden
    • 2
  • Jonathan W. Schooler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta Barbara
  2. 2.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations