Previous research has shown that visual search performance is modulated by the current contents in visual working memory (VWM), even when the contents of VWM are irrelevant to the search task. For example, visual search is faster when the target—rather than a distractor—is surrounded by a shape currently held in VWM. This study uses the modulation of visual search by VWM to investigate properties of VWM. Participants were asked to remember the color or the shape of novel polygons whose “goodness” of figure varied according to Garner’s (1962) rotation and reflection transformation principle. During the memory retention interval, participants searched for a tilted line among vertical lines embedded inside colored polygons. Search was faster when the target—rather than a distractor—was enclosed by the remembered polygons. The congruity effect diminished with increasing memory load and decreasing figure goodness. We conclude that congruity effects in visual search can indirectly assess VWM representation strength.
Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual shortterm memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106–111.
Attneave, F. (1957). Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 221–227.
Awh, E., Barton, B., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychological Science, 18, 622–628.
Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 66–80.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.
Downing, P. E. (2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11, 467–473.
Downing, P. E., & Dodds, C. M. (2004). Competition in visual working memory for control of search. Visual Cognition, 11, 689–703.
Droll, J. A., Hayhoe, M. M., Triesch, J., & Sullivan, B. T. (2005). Task demands control acquisition and storage of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1416–1438.
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual-search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.
Eng, H. Y., Chen, D., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1127–1133.
Garner, W. R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: Wiley.
Garner, W. R., & Sutliff, D. (1974). The effect of goodness on encoding time in visual pattern discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 426–430.
Hayhoe, M., & Ballard, D. (2005). Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 188–194.
Hochberg, J., & McAlister, E. (1953). A quantitative approach to figure “goodness.” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 361–364.
Hollingworth, A. (2003). Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 388–403.
Huang, L., & Pashler, H. (2007). Working memory and the guidance of visual attention: Consonance-driven orienting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 148–153.
Jiang, Y. V., Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 683–702.
Jiang, Y. V., Shim, W. M., & Makovski, T. (in press). Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities. Perception & Psychophysics.
Keren, G., O’Hara, W. P., & Skelton, J. M. (1977). Levels of noise processing and attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 653–664.
Landman, R., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Research, 43, 149–164.
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.
Makovski, T., Shim, W. M., & Jiang, Y. V. (2006). Interference from filled delays on visual change detection. Journal of Vision, 6, 1459–1470.
Makovski, T., Sussman, R. S., & Jiang, Y. V. (2008). Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 369–380.
Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1243–1265.
Olsson, H., & Poom, L. (2005). Visual memory needs categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 8776–8780.
Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369–378.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283–290.
Rauschenberger, R., & Yantis, S. (2006). Perceptual encoding efficiency in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 116–131.
Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245–277.
Song, J. H., & Jiang, Y. V. (2006). Visual working memory for simple and complex features: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 30, 963–972.
Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 248–261.
Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 730–737.
Soto, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D. (2006). Working memory can guide pop-out search. Vision Research, 46, 1010–1018.
Vickery, T. J., King, L. W., & Jiang, Y. V. (2005). Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5, 81–92.
Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2006). The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1436–1451.
Wilken, P., & Ma, W. J. (2004). A detection theory account of change detection. Journal of Vision, 4, 1120–1135.
Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 483–502.
Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 269–274.
Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 363–377.
Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 12, 219–224.
This research was supported in part by NSF Grant 0733764 and NIH Grant 071788.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Makovski, T., Jiang, Y.V. Indirect assessment of visual working memory for simple and complex objects. Memory & Cognition 36, 1132–1143 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1132
- Visual Search
- Congruity Effect
- Memory Load
- Gruity Effect
- Ruent Trial