Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes?

Abstract

Nairne, Thompson, and Pandeirada (2007) demonstrated a striking phenomenon: Words rated for relevance to a grasslands survival scenario were remembered better than identical words encoded under other deep processing conditions. Having replicated this effect using a novel set of words (Experiment 1), we contrasted the schematic processing and evolutionary accounts of the recall advantage (Experiment 2). Inconsistent with the schematic processing account, the grasslands survival scenario produced better recall than did a city survival scenario requiring comparable schematic processing. Recall in the grasslands scenario was unaffected by a self-reference manipulation. The findings are consistent with an evolutionary account that attributes the recall advantage to adaptive memory biases.

References

  1. Bower, G. H., & Gilligan, S. G. (1979). Remembering information related to one’s self. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 420–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Challis, B. H., Velichkovsky, B. M., & Craik, F. I. M. (1996). Levelsof-processing effects on a variety of memory tasks: New findings and theoretical implications. Consciousness & Cognition, 5, 142–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. “City” (2007). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved May 29, 2007, from Encyclopædia Britannica Online: www.britannica.com/eb/article-9106247.

  5. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning &Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fox, E., Griggs, L., & Mouchlianitis, E. (2007). The detection of fear-relevant stimuli: Are guns noticed as quickly as snakes? Emotion, 7, 691–696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamann, S. (2001). Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 394–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hyde, T. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1973). Recall for words as a function of semantic, graphic, and syntactic orienting tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 471–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Cohen, S. M. (in press). The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information. Memory & Cognition.

  11. Kihlstrom, J. F. (1993). What does the self look like? In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), The mental representation of trait and autobiographical knowledge about the self (pp. 79–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marks, I. M. (1969). Fears and phobias. London: Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (in press). Adaptive memory: Remembering with a stone-age brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science.

  14. Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Thompson, S. R. (2008). Adaptive memory: The comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science, 19, 176–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nairne, J. S., Thompson, S. R., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2007). Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Packman, J. L., & Battig, W. F. (1978). Effects of different kinds of semantic processing on memory for words. Memory & Cognition, 6, 502–508.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roediger, H. L., III, & Gallo, D. A. (2002). Levels of processing: Some unanswered questions. In M. Naveh-Benjamin, M. Moscovitch, & H. L. Roediger III (Eds.), Perspectives on human memory and cognitive aging: Essays in honour of Fergus Craik (pp. 28–47). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 35, 677–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seligman, M. E. P. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2, 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 371–394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2005). Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 5–67). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yana Weinstein.

Additional information

This research was partially supported by BBSRC Studentship 07322/-101970 and a generous grant from the Bogue Fellowship, University College London. J.M.B. was supported by National Institute on Aging Grant 5T32AG00030 during the writing of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weinstein, Y., Bugg, J.M. & Roediger, H.L. Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes?. Memory & Cognition 36, 913–919 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.5.913

Download citation

Keywords

  • Inal Interaction
  • Survival Scenario
  • Foreign Land
  • Recall Advantage
  • Part Icipants