Abstract
In two experiments, a parafoveal lexicality effect in the reading of Chinese (a script that does not physically mark word boundaries) was examined. Both experiments used the boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) and indicated that the lexical properties of parafoveal words influenced eye movements. In Experiment 1, the preview stimulus was either a real word or a pseudoword. Targets with word previews, even unrelated ones, were more likely to be skipped than were those with pseudowords. In Experiment 2, all of the preview stimuli had the same first character as the target. Target words with same-morpheme previews were fixated for less time than were those with pseudoword previews, suggesting that morphological processing may be involved in extracting information from parafoveal words in Chinese reading. Together, the two experiments dealing with how words are processed in Chinese may provide some constraints on current computational models of reading.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Academia Sinica Taiwan (1998). Academia Sinica balanced corpus (Version 3) [CD-ROM]. Taipei, Taiwan: Academia Sinica, Chinese Knowledge and Information Processing Group.
Brysbaert, M., & Vitu, F. (1998). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 125–147). Asterdam: Elsevier.
Calvo, M. G., & Meseguer, E. (2002). Eye movements and processing stages in reading: Relative contribution of visual, lexical, and contextual factors. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 5, 66–77.
Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2005). Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 954–959.
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813.
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 417–429.
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1993). Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 201–221.
Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 20–34.
Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431–439.
Inhoff, A. W., Starr, M. [S.], Liu, W., & Wang, J. (1998). Eye-movementcontingent display changes are not compromised by flicker and phosphor persistence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 101–106.
Inhoff, A. W., & Wu, C. (2005). Eye movements and the identification of spatially ambiguous words during Chinese sentence reading. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1345–1356.
Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2005). Fixation durations before word skipping in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 132–138.
Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 262–284.
Liu, W., Inhoff, A. W., Ye, Y., & Wu, C. (2002). Use of parafoveally visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1213–1227.
McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28, 1107–1118.
Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 2201–2217.
Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eyemovement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 1–56.
Radach, R., & Heller, D. (2000). Relations between spatial and temporal aspects of eye movement control. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 165–191). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Radach, R., Inhoff, A. W., & Heller, D. (2004). Orthographic regularity gradually modulates saccade amplitudes in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 27–51.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81.
Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8, 21–30.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
Rayner, K., Li, X., Juhasz, B. J., & Yan, G. (2005). The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1089–1093.
Rayner, K., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2007). Extending the E-Z Reader model of eye movement control to Chinese readers. Cognitive Science, 31, 1021–1034.
Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 26, 445–476.
Reilly, R. G., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 34–55.
Starr, M. S., & Rayner, K. (2001). Eye movements during reading: Some current controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 156–163.
Tsai, J.-L. (2001). A multichannel PC tachistoscope with high resolution and fast display change capability. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33, 524–531.
Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Lin, Y.-C., Tzeng, O. J.-L., & Hung, D. L. (2006). Neighborhood size effects of Chinese words in lexical decision and reading. Language & Linguistics, 7, 659–675.
Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Tzeng, O. J.-L., Hung, D. L., & Yen, N.-S. (2004). Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: Evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences. Brain & Language, 91, 235–244.
Tsai, J.-L., & McConkie, G. W. (2003). Where do Chinese readers send their eyes? In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 159–176). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
White, S. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 52–78.
White, S. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Linguistic and nonlinguistic influences on the eyes’ landing positions during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 760–782.
White, S. J., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 891–896.
Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 259–268.
Yan, M., Richter, E. M., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2007, August). Reading Chinese script: The Beijing Sentence Corpus. Paper presented at the 14th European Conference on Eye Movements, Potsdam, Germany.
Yang, H.-M., & McConkie, G. W. (1999). Reading Chinese: Some basic eye-movement characteristics. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 207–222). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Yang, J., Wang, S., & Rayner, K. (2007, August). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from character n12? Evidence from eye movements. Paper presented at the 14th European Conference on Eye Movements, Potsdam, Germany.
Yang, S.-N., & McConkie, G. W. (2004). Saccade generation during reading: Are words necessary? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 226–261.
Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 525–565.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by a grant from Taiwan’s National Science Council (NSC 93-2413-H-010-003). The revision was completed when the first author was a visiting scholar at Florida State University under support from Taiwan’s National Science Council (NSC-095-2917-I-010-001).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yen, MH., Tsai, JL., Tzeng, O.J.L. et al. Eye movements and parafoveal word processing in reading Chinese. Memory & Cognition 36, 1033–1045 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.5.1033
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.5.1033