Allocating time to future tasks: The effect of task segmentation on planning fallacy bias

Abstract

The scheduling component of the time management process was used as a (“paradigm”) to investigate the allocation of time to future tasks. In three experiments, we compared task time allocation for a single task with the summed time allocations given for each subtask that made up the single task. In all three, we found that allocated time for a single task was significantly smaller than the summed time allocated to the individual subtasks. We refer to this as the segmentation effect. In Experiment 3, we asked participants to give estimates by placing a mark on a time line, and found that giving time allocations in the form of rounded close approximations probably does not account for the segmentation effect. We discuss the results in relation to the basic processes used to allocate time to future tasks and the means by which planning fallacy bias might be reduced.

References

  1. Armstrong, J. S., Denniston, W. B., & Gordon, M. M. (1975). The use of the decomposition principle in making judgments. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 14, 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berkeley, D., & Humphreys, P. (1982). Structuring decision problems and the (“bias heuristic.”) Acta Psychologica, 50, 201–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Block, R. A., & Zakay, D. (1997). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 184–197.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & MacDonald, H. (1997). The role of motivated reasoning in optimistic time predications. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 238–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the (“planning fallacy”): Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67, 366–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burt, C. D. B., & Forsyth, D. (1999). Designing materials for efficient time management: Segmentation and planning space. Cognitive Technology, 4, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burt, C. D. B. & Kemp, S. (1994). Construction of activity duration and time management potential. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Byram, S. J. (1997). Cognitive and motivational factors influencing time prediction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 216–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Claessens, B. J. C., Van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2004). Planning behavior and perceived control of time at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 937–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisler, H. (1976). Experiments on subjective duration 1868-1975: A collection of power function exponents. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1154–1171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Francis-Smythe, J. A., & Robertson, I. T. (1999). On the relationship between time management and time estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grimstad, S., Jørgensen, M., & Moløkken-Østvold, K. (2006). Software effort estimation terminology: The tower of Babel. Information & Software Technology, 48, 302–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Henrion, M., Fischer, G. W. & Mullin, T. (1993). Divide and conquer? Effects of decomposition on the accuracy and calibration of subjective probability distributions. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 55, 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hora, S. C., Dodd, N. G., & Hora, J. A. (1993). The use of decomposition in probability assessment of continuous variables. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hornik, J. (1981). Time cue and time perception effect on response to mail survey. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Bradburn, N. M. (1990). Reports of elapsed time: Bounding and rounding processes in estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jørgensen, M. (2004). Top-down and bottom-up estimation of software development effort. Information & Software Technology, 46, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Studies in Management Science, 12, 313–327.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kruger, J., & Evans, M. (2004). If you don’t want to be late, enumerate: Unpacking reduces the planning fallacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 586–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Macan, T. M. (1994). Time management: Test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. MacGregor, D. G., & Armstrong, J. S. (1994). Judgmental decomposition: When does it work? International Journal of Forecasting, 10, 495–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Newby-Clark, I. R., Ross, M., Buehler, R., Koehler, D. J., & Griffin, D. (2000). People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 171–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oden, G. (1987). Concept, knowledge, and thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 203–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Roy, M. M., Christenfeld, N. J. S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2005). Underestimating the duration of future events: Memory incorrectly used or memory bias? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 738–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zakay, D. (1990). The evasive art of subjective time measurement: Some methodological dilemmas. In R. A. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 59–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher D. B. Burt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forsyth, D.K., Burt, C.D.B. Allocating time to future tasks: The effect of task segmentation on planning fallacy bias. Memory & Cognition 36, 791–798 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.4.791

Download citation

Keywords

  • Time Allocation
  • Future Task
  • Software Effort Estimation
  • Spelling Mistake
  • Phone Bill