Abstract
The scheduling component of the time management process was used as a (“paradigm”) to investigate the allocation of time to future tasks. In three experiments, we compared task time allocation for a single task with the summed time allocations given for each subtask that made up the single task. In all three, we found that allocated time for a single task was significantly smaller than the summed time allocated to the individual subtasks. We refer to this as the segmentation effect. In Experiment 3, we asked participants to give estimates by placing a mark on a time line, and found that giving time allocations in the form of rounded close approximations probably does not account for the segmentation effect. We discuss the results in relation to the basic processes used to allocate time to future tasks and the means by which planning fallacy bias might be reduced.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Armstrong, J. S., Denniston, W. B., & Gordon, M. M. (1975). The use of the decomposition principle in making judgments. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 14, 257–263.
Berkeley, D., & Humphreys, P. (1982). Structuring decision problems and the (“bias heuristic.”) Acta Psychologica, 50, 201–252.
Block, R. A., & Zakay, D. (1997). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 184–197.
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & MacDonald, H. (1997). The role of motivated reasoning in optimistic time predications. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 238–247.
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the (“planning fallacy”): Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67, 366–381.
Burt, C. D. B., & Forsyth, D. (1999). Designing materials for efficient time management: Segmentation and planning space. Cognitive Technology, 4, 11–18.
Burt, C. D. B. & Kemp, S. (1994). Construction of activity duration and time management potential. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 155–168.
Byram, S. J. (1997). Cognitive and motivational factors influencing time prediction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 216–239.
Claessens, B. J. C., Van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2004). Planning behavior and perceived control of time at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 937–950.
Eisler, H. (1976). Experiments on subjective duration 1868-1975: A collection of power function exponents. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1154–1171.
Francis-Smythe, J. A., & Robertson, I. T. (1999). On the relationship between time management and time estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 333–347.
Grimstad, S., Jørgensen, M., & Moløkken-Østvold, K. (2006). Software effort estimation terminology: The tower of Babel. Information & Software Technology, 48, 302–310.
Henrion, M., Fischer, G. W. & Mullin, T. (1993). Divide and conquer? Effects of decomposition on the accuracy and calibration of subjective probability distributions. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 55, 207–227.
Hora, S. C., Dodd, N. G., & Hora, J. A. (1993). The use of decomposition in probability assessment of continuous variables. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 133–147.
Hornik, J. (1981). Time cue and time perception effect on response to mail survey. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 243–248.
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Bradburn, N. M. (1990). Reports of elapsed time: Bounding and rounding processes in estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 196–213.
Jørgensen, M. (2004). Top-down and bottom-up estimation of software development effort. Information & Software Technology, 46, 3–16.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Studies in Management Science, 12, 313–327.
Kruger, J., & Evans, M. (2004). If you don’t want to be late, enumerate: Unpacking reduces the planning fallacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 586–598.
Macan, T. M. (1994). Time management: Test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 381–391.
MacGregor, D. G., & Armstrong, J. S. (1994). Judgmental decomposition: When does it work? International Journal of Forecasting, 10, 495–506.
Newby-Clark, I. R., Ross, M., Buehler, R., Koehler, D. J., & Griffin, D. (2000). People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 171–182.
Oden, G. (1987). Concept, knowledge, and thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 203–227.
Roy, M. M., Christenfeld, N. J. S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2005). Underestimating the duration of future events: Memory incorrectly used or memory bias? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 738–756.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zakay, D. (1990). The evasive art of subjective time measurement: Some methodological dilemmas. In R. A. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 59–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forsyth, D.K., Burt, C.D.B. Allocating time to future tasks: The effect of task segmentation on planning fallacy bias. Memory & Cognition 36, 791–798 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.4.791
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.4.791