Abstract
Five experiments provide evidence for a primacy effect in the formation of inductive categories. Participants completed a category induction task in which they observed and reproduced a set of lines that varied in length but were serially ordered so that they increased or decreased in length. Subsequent estimates of the average of the distribution were systematically biased in the direction of stimuli encountered at the beginning of the induction task, suggesting that initially encountered stimuli exert greater weight in a category representation than do subsequent stimuli. We offer possible explanations for why this primacy effect might arise.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, N. H., & Jacobson, A. (1965). Effect of stimulus inconsistency and discounting instructions in personality impression formation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2, 531–539.
Asch, S. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.
Crawford, L. E., Huttenlocher, J., & Engebretson, P. H. (2000). Category effects on estimates of stimuli: Perception or reconstruction? Psychological Science, 11, 280–284.
Crawford, L. E., Huttenlocher, J., & Hedges, L. V. (2006). Withincategory feature correlations and Bayesian adjustment strategies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 245–250.
DeCarlo, L. T., & Cross, D. V. (1990). Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: Models and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 375–396.
Dennis, M. J., & Ahn, W.-K. (2001). Primacy in causal strength judgments: The effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships. Memory & Cognition, 29, 152–164.
Duffy, S., Huttenlocher, J., & Crawford, L. E. (2006). Children use categories to maximize accuracy in estimation. Developmental Science, 9, 598–604.
Duffy, S., Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L., & Crawford, L. E. (2007). Category effects on stimulus estimation for skewed and shifting frequency Distributions. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University.
Duffy, S., & Kitayama, S. (2007). Mnemonic context effect in two cultures: Attention to memory representations? Cognitive Science, 31, 1–12.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1885)
Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659–676.
Fiedler, K., & Juslin, P. (Eds.) (2006). Information sampling and adaptive cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Flannagan, M. J., Fried, L. S., & Holyoak, K. J. (1986). Distributional expectations and the induction of category structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 241–256.
Fried, L. S., & Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Induction of category distributions: A framework for classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 234–257.
Gershberg, F. B., & Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Serial position effects in implicit and explicit tests of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1370–1378.
Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real World. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Dread risk, September 11, and fatal traffic accidents. Psychological Science, 15, 286–287.
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Ebert, A. (1998). AIDS counselling for low-risk clients. AIDS Care, 10, 197–211.
Holland, H. K., & Lockhead, G. R. (1968). Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 409–414.
Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 923–941.
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (2000). Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 220–241.
Johnston, L. (1996). Resisting change: Information seeking and stereotype change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 799–825.
Juslin, P., Fiedler, K., & Chater, N. (2006). Less is more in covariation detection: Or is it? In K. Fiedler & P. Juslin (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 92–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kareev, Y. (2000). Seven (indeed, plus or minus two) and the detection of correlations. Psychological Review, 107, 397–403.
Kareev, Y., Lieberman, I., & Lev, M. (1997). Through a narrow window: Sample size and the perception of correlation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 278–287.
Parducci, A. (1964). Sequential effects in judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 61, 163–167.
Petzold, P., & Haubensak, G. (2001). Higher order sequential effects in psychophysical judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 969–978.
Petzold, P., & Haubensak, G. (2004). The influence of category membership of stimuli on sequential effects in magnitude judgment. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 655–678.
Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.
Sailor, K. M., & Antoine, M. (2005). Is memory for stimulus magnitude Bayesian? Memory & Cognition, 33, 840–851.
Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Kuiper, W. E. (1997). Sequence effects in hedonic judgments of taste stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 900–912.
Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1997). Intuitions about sample size: The empirical law of large numbers. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 33–51.
Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1–26.
Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 727–741.
Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Environments that make us smart: Ecological rationality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 167–171.
Trolier, T. K., & Hamilton, D. L. (1986). Variables influencing judgments of correlational relations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 50, 879–888.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130.
Wedell, D. H. (1995). Contrast effects in paired comparisons: Evidence for both stimulus-based and response-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1158–1173.
Yates, J. F., & Curley, S. P. (1986). Contingency judgment: Primacy effects and attention decrement. Acta Psychologica, 62, 293–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duffy, S., Crawford, L.E. Primacy or recency effects in forming inductive categories. Memory & Cognition 36, 567–577 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.567
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.567