Abstract
Becoming familiar with an environment requires the ability to integrate spatial information from different views. We provide evidence that view combination, a mechanism believed to underlie the ability to recognize novel views of familiar objects, is also used to recognize coherent, real-world scenes. In two experiments, we trained participants to recognize a real-world scene from two perspectives. When the angular difference between the learned views was relatively small, the participants subsequently recognized novel views from locations between the learned views about as well as they recognized the learned views and better than novel views situated outside of the shortest distance between the learned views. In contrast, with large angles between training views, all the novel views were recognized less well than the trained views. These results extend the view combination approach to scenes and are difficult to reconcile with models proposing that scenes are recognized by transforming them to match only the nearest stored view.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115–147.
Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depthrotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1162–1182.
Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 60–64.
Bülthoff, H. H., Edelman, S., & Tarr, M. J. (1995). How are threedimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex, 5, 247–260.
Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1996). The influence of functional relations on spatial term selection. Psychological Science, 7, 56–60.
Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302–307.
Edelman, S. (1999). Representation and recognition in vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385–2400.
Edelman, S., Bülthoff, H. H., & Bülthoff, I. (1999). Effects of parametric manipulation of inter-stimulus similarity on 3D object categorization. Spatial Vision, 12, 107–123.
Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316–355.
Friedman, A., & Harding, C. A. (1990). Seeing versus imagining movement in depth. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 371–383.
Friedman, A., Spetch, M. L., & Ferrey, A. (2005). Recognition by humans and pigeons of novel views of 3-D objects and their photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 149–162.
Gottesman, C. V., & Intraub, H. (2003). Constraints on spatial extrapolation in the mental representation of scenes: View-boundaries vs. object-boundaries. Visual Cognition, 10, 875–893.
Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003). Global transsaccadic change blindness during scene perception. Psychological Science, 14, 493–497.
Hock, H. S., & Schmelzkopf, K. F. (1980). The abstraction of schematic representations from photographs of real-world scenes. Memory & Cognition, 8, 543–554.
Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2004). Sustained change blindness to incremental scene rotation: A dissociation between explicit change detection and visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 800–807.
Intraub, H., Gottesman, C. V., & Bills, A. (1998). Effects of perceiving and imagining scenes on memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 186–201.
Intraub, H., Gottesman, C. V., Willey, E. V., & Zuk, I. J. (1996). Boundary extension for briefly glimpsed photographs: Do common perceptual processes result in unexpected memory distortions? Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 118–134.
Intraub, H., & Richardson, M. (1989). Wide-angle memories of closeup scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 179–187.
Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 4, 565–572.
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490.
Mandler, J. M., & Parker, R. E. (1976). Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 38–48.
Mandler, J. M., & Stein, N. L. (1974). Recall and recognition of pictures by children as a function of organization and distractor similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 657–669.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
McNamara, T. P., Diwadkar, V. A., Blevins, W. A., & Valiquette, C. M. (2006). Representations of apparent rotation. Visual Cognition, 13, 273–307.
Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2000). Making space: The development of spatial representation and reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
O’Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102–106.
Shemyakin, F. N. (1962). Orientation in space. In B. G. Anan’yev et al. (Eds.), Psychological science in the USSR (Vol. 1, Pt. 1, pp. 186–255). Washington, DC: U. S. Office of Technical Reports.
Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In H. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 10–55). New York: Academic Press.
Spetch, M. L., & Friedman, A. (2003). Recognizing rotated views of objects: Interpolation versus generalization by humans and pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 135–140.
Spetch, M. L., Friedman, A., & Reid, S. L. (2001). The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 238–255.
Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55–82.
Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233–282.
Tolman, E. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189–208.
Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193–254.
Ullman, S. (1996). High-level vision: Object recognition and visual cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friedman, A., Waller, D. View combination in scene recognition. Memory & Cognition 36, 467–478 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.467
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.467