Abstract
Mental rotation of objects improves when passive tactile information for the rotating object accompanies the imagined rotation (Wraga, Creem, & Proffitt, 2000). We examined this phenomenon further using a within-subjects paradigm involving handheld objects. In Experiment 1, participants imagined rotating an unseen object placed on their upturned palms. The participants were faster at mental rotation when the object was rotated on their palm than when the object remained stationary. Experiment 2 tested whether the performance advantage would endure when the participants received tactile information for only the start- and endpoints of the rotation event. This manipulation did not improve performance, relative to a stationary control. Experiment 3 revealed that ambiguous tactile information, continuous with the rotation event but independent of object shape, actually degraded performance, relative to a stationary control. In Experiment 4, we found that continuous tactile rotation discrepant from imagined object movement also hindered performance, as compared with continuous tactile information aligned with imagined object movement. The findings suggest a tight coupling between tactile information specifying continuous object rotation and the corresponding internal representation of the rotating object.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brooks, L. R. (1968). Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22, 349–368.
Carpenter, P. A., & Eisenberg, P. (1978). Mental rotation and the frame of reference in blind and sighted individuals. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 117–124.
Cohen, M. S., Kosslyn, S. M., Breiter, H. C., DiGirolamo, G. J., Thompson, W. L., Anderson, A. K., et al. (1996). Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation: A mapping study using functional MRI. Brain, 119, 89–100.
Corballis, M. C., & Blackman, A. R. (1990). The effect of apparent motion on mental rotation. Memory & Cognition, 18, 551–555.
Corballis, M. C., & McMaster, H. (1996). The roles of stimulus-response compatibility and mental rotation in mirror-image and left-right decisions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 397–401.
Creem, S. H., Wraga, M., & Proffitt, D. R. (2001). Imagining physically impossible self-rotations: Geometry is more important than gravity. Cognition, 81, 41–64.
Dellantonio, A., & Spagnolo, F. (1990). Mental rotation of tactual stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 73, 245–257.
Farrell, M. J., & Robertson, I. H. (1998). Mental rotation and the automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 227–233.
Heil, M., Bajrić, J., Rösler, F., & Hennighausen, E. (1997). A rotation aftereffect changes both the speed and the preferred direction of mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 681–692.
Jolicoeur, P., & Cavanagh, P. (1992). Mental rotation, physical rotation, and surface media. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 371–384.
Jolicoeur, P., Corballis, M. C., & Lawson, R. (1998). The influence of perceived rotary motion on the recognition of rotated objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 140–146.
Kosslyn, S. M., DiGirolamo, G. J., Thompson, W. L., & Alpert, N. M. (1998). Mental rotation of objects versus hands: Neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. Psychophysiology, 35, 151–161.
Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1997). Relative availability of surface and object properties during early haptic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1690–1707.
Loomis, J. M., & Lederman, S. J. (1986). Tactual perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. II. Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 31.1–31.41). New York: Wiley.
Marmor, G. S., & Zaback, L. A. (1976). Mental rotation by the blind: Does mental rotation depend on visual imagery? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 515–521.
Parsons, L. M. (1987). Imagined spatial transformations of one’s hands and feet. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 178–241.
Prather, S. C., & Sathian, K. (2002). Mental rotation of tactile stimuli. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 91–98.
Prather, S. C., Votaw, J. R., & Sathian, K. (2004). Task-specific recruitment of dorsal and ventral visual areas during tactile perception. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1079–1087.
Presson, C. C. (1982). Strategies in spatial reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 8, 243–251.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 1–24.
Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1157–1165.
Robert, M., & Chevrier, E. (2003). Does men’s advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen? Memory & Cognition, 31, 1136–1145.
Sathian, K. (2005). Visual cortical activity during tactile perception in the sighted and the visually deprived. Developmental Psychobiology, 46, 279–286.
Sathian, K., & Zangaladze, A. (2002). Feeling with the mind’s eye: Contribution of visual cortex to tactile perception. Behavioural Brain Research, 135, 127–132.
Sathian, K., Zangaladze, A., Hoffman, J. M., & Grafton, S. T. (1997). Feeling with the mind’s eye. NeuroReport, 8, 3877–3881.
Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.
Voisin, J., Benoit, G., & Chapman, C. E. (2002). Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: Two-dimensional angle discrimination. Experimental Brain Research, 145, 239–250.
Voisin, J., Lamarre, Y., & Chapman, C. E. (2002). Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: Contribution of cutaneous and proprioceptive inputs. Experimental Brain Research, 145, 251–260.
Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 151–168.
Wraga, M., Shephard, J. M., Church, J. A., Inati, S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Imagined rotations of self versus objects: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1351–1361.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant BCS-0517939 to the first author. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wraga, M., Swaby, M. & Flynn, C.M. Passive tactile feedback facilitates mental rotation of handheld objects. Memory & Cognition 36, 271–281 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.271
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.271