Abstract
Three experiments provide evidence for an age-related deficit in the binding of actors with their actions. Young and older adults were tested on their memory for a series of events, each involving an actor performing a simple action. Older adults had greater difficulty than did young adults at discriminating old events from novel conjunctions of familiar actors and actions, even when the two groups were equated on memory for each of those features in isolation by using a longer retention interval for young adults. These results are consistent with an age-related associative deficit linked to declines in hippocampal and prefrontal cortical functioning. They further provide evidence that age differences in source monitoring are not limited to speech acts but, rather, generalize to more complex actions. Finally, they provide evidence for age differences in susceptibility to conjunction memory errors, stemming from decreased reliance on recollection and increased reliance on familiarity with increased age. Example videos may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bastin, C., & Van der Linden, M. (2003). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition memory: A study of the effects of test format and aging. Neuropsychology, 17, 14–24.
Bayen, U. J. (1999). Aging and source monitoring of characters in literary texts. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition, 6, 187–200.
Bayen, U. J., & Murnane, K. (1996). Aging and the use of perceptual and temporal information in source memory tasks. Psychology & Aging, 11, 293–303.
Brown, A. S., Jones, E. M., & Davis, T. L. (1995). Age differences in conversational source monitoring. Psychology & Aging, 10, 111–122.
Brown, E., Deffenbacher, K., & Sturgill, W. (1977). Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 311–318.
Buckhout, R. (1974). Eyewitness testimony. Scientific American, 231, 23–31.
Cabeza, R. (2006). Prefrontal and medial temporal lobe contributions to relational memory in young and older adults. In H. D. Zimmer, A. Mecklinger, & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Handbook of binding and memory: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 595–626). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castel, A. D., & Craik, F. I. M. (2003). The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information. Psychology & Aging, 18, 873–885.
Chalfonte, B. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 24, 403–416.
Cutting, J. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1977). Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 353–356.
Davis, H. P., & Bernstein, P. A. (1992). Age-related changes in explicit and implicit memory. In L. R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory (2nd ed., pp. 249–261). New York: Guilford.
Eichenbaum, H., & Bunsey, M. (1995). On the binding of associations in memory: Clues from studies on the role of the hippocampal region in paired-associate learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 19–23.
Ferguson, S. A., Hashtroudi, S., & Johnson, M. K. (1992). Age differences in using source-relevant cues. Psychology & Aging, 7, 443–452.
Giovanello, K. S., Schnyer, D. M., & Verfaellie, M. (2004). A critical role for the anterior hippocampus in relational memory: Evidence from an fMRI study comparing associative and item recognition. Hippocampus, 14, 5–8.
Glisky, E. L., Rubin, S. R., & Davidson, P. S. R. (2001). Source memory in older adults: An encoding or retrieval problem? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1131–1146.
Gluck, M., & Myers, C. (2001). Gateway to memory: An introduction to neural network modeling of the hippocampus and learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., & Chrosniak, L. D. (1989). Aging and source monitoring. Psychology & Aging, 4, 106–112.
Henkel, L. A., Johnson, M. K., & De Leonardis, D. M. (1998). Aging and source monitoring: Cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 251–268.
Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 3–22.
Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1997). An opposition procedure for detecting age-related deficits in recollection: Telling effects of repetition. Psychology & Aging, 12, 352–361.
Johnson, M. K., De Leonardis, D. M., Hashtroudi, S., & Ferguson, S. A. (1995). Aging and single versus multiple cues in source monitoring. Psychology & Aging, 10, 507–517.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.
Jones, T. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2001). Feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process theory. Journal of Memory & Language, 45, 82–102.
Jones, T. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2005). Conjunction errors in recognition memory: Modality-free errors for older adults but not for young adults. Acta Psychologica, 120, 55–73.
Kelley, R., & Wixted, J. T. (2001). On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 701–722.
Kersten, A. W., & Earles, J. L. (2004). Semantic context influences memory for verbs more than memory for nouns. Memory & Cognition, 32, 198–211.
Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., & Sheffer, D. (1988). Telling the same story twice: Output monitoring and age. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 23–39.
Koutstaal, W. (2003). Older adults encode-but do not always use- perceptual details: Intentional versus unintentional effects of detail on memory judgments. Psychological Science, 14, 189–193.
Kroll, N. E. A., Knight, R. T., Metcalfe, J., Wolf, E. S., & Tulving, E. (1996). Cohesion failure as a source of memory illusions. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 176–196.
Lampinen, J. M., Odegard, T. N., & Neuschatz, J. S. (2004). Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 332–342.
Light, L. L., Patterson, M. M., Chung, C., & Healy, M. R. (2004). Effects of repetition and response deadline on associative recognition in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1182–1193.
Loftus, E. F. (1976). Unconscious transference. Law & Psychology Review, 2, 93–98.
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C.D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mitchell, K. J., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., & D’Esposito, M. D. (2000). fMRI evidence of age-related hippocampal dysfunction in feature binding in working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 197–206.
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1170–1187.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Hussain, Z., Guez, J., & Bar-On, M. (2003). Adult age differences in episodic memory: Further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 826–837.
Odegard, T. N., Lampinen, J. M., & Toglia, M. P. (2005). Meaning’s moderating effect on recollection rejection. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 416–429.
O’Reilly, R. C., & Rudy, J. W. (2001). Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: Principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 108, 311–345.
Perfect, T. J., & Harris, L. J. (2003). Adult age differences in unconscious transference: Source confusion or identity blending? Memory & Cognition, 31, 570–580.
Prabhakaran, V., Narayanan, K., Zhao, Z., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). Integration of diverse information in working memory within the frontal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 85–90.
Rahhal, T. A., May, C. P., & Hasher, L. (2002). Truth and character: Sources that older adults can remember. Psychological Science, 13, 101–105.
Raz, N. (2000). Aging of the brain and its impact on cognitive performance: Integration of structural and functional findings. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1–90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Raz, N., Rodrigue, K. M., Head, D., Kennedy, K. M., & Acker, J. D. (2004). Differential aging of the medial temporal lobe: A study of a five-year change. Neurology, 62, 433–438.
Read, J. D., Tollestrup, P., Hammersley, R., McFadzen, E., & Christensen, A. (1990). The unconscious transference effect: Are innocent bystanders ever misidentified? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 3–31.
Reinitz, M. T., Verfaellie, M., & Milberg, W. P. (1996). Memory conjunction errors in normal and amnesic participants. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 286–299.
Ross, D. F., Ceci, S. J., Dunning, D., & Toglia, M. P. (1994). Unconscious transference and mistaken identity when a witness misidentifies a familiar but innocent person. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 918–930.
Schacter, D. L., Kaszniak, A. W., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Valdiserri, M. (1991). The relation between source memory and aging. Psychology & Aging, 6, 559–568.
Selkoe, D. J. (1992). Aging brain, aging mind. Scientific American, 267, 135–142.
Shipley, W. C. (1986). Shipley Institute of Living Scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Simons, J. S., Dodson, C. S., Bell, D., & Schacter, D. L. (2004). Specific- and partial-source memory: Effects of aging. Psychology & Aging, 19, 689–694.
Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis. Psychology & Aging, 10, 527–539.
Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195–231.
Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107–141.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1341–1354.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by National Institute on Aging Grant R15-AG23526 and by a New Project Development Award from Florida Atlantic University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kersten, A.W., Earles, J.L., Curtayne, E.S. et al. Adult age differences in binding actors and actions in memory for events. Memory & Cognition 36, 119–131 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.1.119
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.1.119