Abstract
We trained 4 pigeons in a numerical bisection task to discriminate between pairs of keylight flashes with a ratio of 1∶3 (2 vs. 6, 4 vs. 12, and 8 vs. 24) that were presented in a sample phase. Responses to the blue key were reinforced after a sequence of a larger number of flashes, and responses to the white key were reinforced after a sequence of a smaller number of flashes. The intervals between flashes in the sample phase were randomized to attenuate the covariation of temporal cues with flash number. Pigeons responded accurately in each of the discriminations, with typically 85%–90% correct responses. Transfer tests showed that the proportion of large responses increased with number and performance generalized to larger values outside the training ranges. Psychometric functions superposed when plotted on a relative scale, and estimates of Weber fractions were approximately constant, suggesting that variability was scalar. However, contrary to previous research in nonhumans, bisection points were located at the arithmetic, not geometric, mean. Hierarchical logistic regressions confirmed significant control over responding by number beyond that attributable to temporal cues. These results show that pigeons are able to respond accurately in a relative numerosity discrimination with successively presented visual stimuli, although the nature of the numerical representation and response rule remains unclear.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allan, L. G. (2002). The location and interpretation of the bisection point. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 43–60.
Alsop, B., & Honig, W. K. (1991). Sequential stimuli and relative numerosity discriminations in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 386–395.
Beran, M. J. (2001). Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 181–191.
Beran, M. J. (2004). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) respond to nonvisible sets after one-by-one addition and removal of items. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 25–36.
Beran, M. J. (2007). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) enumerate large and small sequentially presented sets of items using analog numerical representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 42–54.
Brannon, E. M. (2006). The representation of numerical magnitude. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 222–229.
Brown, G. D. A., McCormack, T., Smith, M., & Stewart, N. (2005). Identification and bisection of temporal durations and tone frequencies: Common models for temporal and nontemporal stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 919–938.
Christensen, D. R., & Grace, R. C. (2008). Rapid acquisition in concurrent chains: Effects of initial-link duration. Behavioural Processes, 78, 217–223.
Cordes, S., Gelman, R., Gallistel, C. R., & Whalen, J. (2001). Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 698–707.
Davis, H., & Pérusse, R. (1988). Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 11, 561–579.
Droit-Volet, S., Clément, A., & Fayol, M. (2003). Time and number discrimination in a bisection task with a sequence of stimuli: A developmental approach. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 63–76.
Emmerton, J. (1998). Numerosity differences and effects of stimulus density on pigeons’ discrimination performance. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 243–256.
Emmerton, J., & Renner, J. C. (2006). Scalar effects in the discrimination of numerosity by pigeons. Learning & Behavior, 34, 176–192.
Fernandes, D. M., & Church, R. M. (1982). Discrimination of the number of sequential events by rats. Animal Learning & Behavior, 10, 171–176.
Fetterman, J. G. (1993). Numerosity discrimination: Both time and number matter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 149–164.
Fetterman, J. G., Dreyfus, L. R., & Stubbs, D. A. (1985). Scaling of response-based events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 388–404.
Fetterman, J. G., Stubbs, D. A., & Dreyfus, L. R. (1986). Scaling of events spaced in time. Behavioural Processes, 13, 53–68.
Fleshler, M., & Hoffman, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 529–530.
Gibbon, J. (1981). On the form and location of the psychometric bisection function for time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 24, 58–87.
Hanus, D., & Call, J. (2007). Discrete quantity judgments in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus): The effect of presenting whole sets versus item-by-item. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121, 241–249.
Hauser, M. D., Carey, S., & Hauser, L. B. (2000). Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 267, 829–833.
Honig, W. K., & Stewart, K. E. (1989). Discrimination of relative numerosity by pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 17, 134–146.
Jordan, K. E., & Brannon, E. M. (2006a). A common representational system governed by Weber’s law: Nonverbal numerical similarity judgments in 6-year-olds and rhesus macaques. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 215–229.
Jordan, K. E., & Brannon, E. M. (2006b). Weber’s law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Animal Cognition, 9, 159–172.
Meck, W. H., & Church, R. M. (1983). A mode control model of counting and timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 320–334.
Olthof, A., Iden, C. M., & Roberts, W. A. (1997). Judgments of ordinality and summation of number symbols by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 325–339.
Raslear, T. G. (1985). A test of the Pfanzagl bisection model in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 49–62.
Rilling, M., & McDiarmid, C. (1965). Signal detection in fixed-ratio schedules. Science, 148, 526–527.
Roberts, W. A. (2005). How do pigeons represent numbers? Studies of number scale bisection. Behavioural Processes, 69, 33–43.
Roberts, W. A., & Mitchell, S. (1994). Can a pigeon simultaneously process temporal and numerical information? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 66–78.
Rumbaugh, D. M., Savage-Rumbaugh, S., & Hegel, M. T. (1987). Summation in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 107–115.
Tan, L., Grace, R. C., Holland, S., & McLean, A. P. (2007). Numerical reproduction in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 409–427.
vanMarle, K., Aw, J., McCrink, K., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) quantify objects and substances. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120, 416–426.
Wearden, J. H., & Ferrara, A. (1995). Stimulus spacing effects in temporal bisection by humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48Bv, 289–310.
Wearden, J. H., & Ferrara, A. (1996). Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 24–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was funded by a TEC Bright Futures Top Achiever Doctoral Scholarship and was conducted at the University of Canterbury, New Zealand, as part of the doctoral research of the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, L., Grace, R.C. Discrimination and representation of relative numerosity in a bisection task by pigeons. Learning & Behavior 38, 408–417 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.38.4.408
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.38.4.408