Advertisement

Learning & Behavior

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 160–168 | Cite as

The derived generalization of thought suppression

  • Nic HooperEmail author
  • Jo Saunders
  • Louise McHugh
Article

Abstract

Thought suppression appears to be a relatively ineffective and even counterproductive strategy for dealing with unwanted thoughts. However, the psychological processes responsible for unsuccessful suppression are still underspecified. One process that may be implicated is derived stimulus relations, which may underlie the formation of unintentional relations that act to hamper suppression attempts. To test this prediction, participants were trained and tested for the formation of three derived equivalence relations using a match-to-sample procedure. Subsequently, they were instructed to suppress all thoughts of a particular target word that was a member of one of the three relations and were also allowed to selectively remove words that appeared on a computer screen in front of them by pressing the space bar. Results showed, as predicted, that participants not only removed the to-be-suppressed stimulus, but also removed words in derived relations with that stimulus, thus showing transformation of suppression/interference functions via derived equivalence. The theoretical implications of this demonstration, including its potential as a model for a key psychological process involved in unsuccessful thought suppression, are discussed.

Keywords

Target Word Comparison Stimulus Unrelated Word Present Stud Thought Suppression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Augustson, E. M., & Dougher, M. J. (1997). The transfer of avoidance evoking functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 28, 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, D. (1989). Behavior-behavior analysis, human schedule performance, and radical behaviorism. Psychological Record, 39, 339–350.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, D., & Browne, M., Smeets, P. [M.], & Roche, B. (1995). A transfer of functions and a conditional transfer of functions through equivalence relations in three-to six-year-old children. Psychological Record, 45, 405–430.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, D., & Keenan, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and nonarbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes-Holmes, D., Cochrane, A., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & McHugh, L. (2004). Psychological acceptance: Experimental analyses and theoretical interpretations. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 517–530.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory (2nd ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  7. Beevers, C. G., Wenzlaff, R. M., Hayes, A. M., & Scott, W. D. (1999). Depression and the ironic effects of thought suppression: Therapeutic strategies for improving mental control. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 6, 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2010). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological flexibility and acceptance. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  9. Brewin, C. R., Watson, M., McCarthy, S., Hyman, P., & Dayson, D. (1998). Intrusive memories and depression in cancer patients. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 36, 1131–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook, M., & Mineka, S. (1990). Selective associations in the observational conditioning of fear in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 372–389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1996). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness and opposition. Psychological Record, 46, 271–300.Google Scholar
  13. Dymond, S., & Rehfeldt, R. (2000). Understanding complex behavior: The transformation of stimulus functions. Behavior Analyst, 23, 239–254.Google Scholar
  14. Dymond, S., & Roche, B. (2009). A contemporary behavior analysis of anxiety and avoidance. Behavior Analyst, 32, 7–28.Google Scholar
  15. Dymond, S., Roche, B., Forsyth, J. P., Whelan, R., & Rhoden, J. (2007). Transformation of avoidance response functions in accordance with same and opposite relational frames. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 249–262.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  17. Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view of the purposes of science. Behavior Analyst, 9, 175–190.Google Scholar
  18. Lavy, E. H., & Van den Hout, M. A. (1990). Thought suppression induces intrusions. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 18, 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Markham, M. R., Dougher, M. J., & Augustson, E. M. (2002). Transfer of operant discrimination and respondent elicitation via emergent relations of compound stimuli. Psychological Record, 52, 325–350.Google Scholar
  20. McHugh, L., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Understanding perspective-taking, false belief, and deception from a behavioural perspective. Irish Psychologist, 30, 142–147.Google Scholar
  21. Mineka, S., & Tomarken, A. J. (1989). The role of cognitive biases in the origins and maintenance of fear and anxiety disorders. In T. Archer & L.-G. Nilsson (Eds.), Aversion, avoidance, and anxiety: Perspectives on aversively motivated behavior (pp. 195–221). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Najmi, S., & Wegner, D. M. (2008). The gravity of unwanted thoughts: Asymmetric priming effects in thought suppression. Consciousness & Cognition, 17, 114–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rachman, S., & de Silva, P. (1978). Abnormal and normal obsessions. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 16, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rassin, E., Muris, P., Jong, J., & de Bruin, G. (2005). Summoning white bears or letting them free: The influence of the content of control instructions on target thought frequency. Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment, 27, 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reiss, S. (1980). Pavlovian conditioning and human fear: An expectancy model. Behavior Therapy, 11, 380–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McGeady, S. (2000). Contextual control over the derived transformation of discriminative and sexual arousal functions. Psychological Record, 50, 267–291.Google Scholar
  28. Schell, A. M., Dawson, M. E., & Marinkovic, K. (1991). Effects of potentially phobic conditioned stimuli on retention, reconditioning, and extinction of the conditioned skin conductance response. Psychophysiology, 28, 140–153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
  30. Sidman, M., Kirk, B., & Willson-Morris, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Steele, D. [L.], & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Walther, E., Nagengast, B., & Trasselli, C. (2005). Evaluative conditioning in social psychology: Facts and speculations. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wegner, D. M. (1989). White bears and other unwanted thoughts: Suppression, obsession, and the psychology of mental control. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  34. Wegner, D. M., & Erber, R. (1992). The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63, 903–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wegner, D. M., & Gold, D. B. (1995). Fanning old flames: Emotional and cognitive effects of suppressing thoughts of a past relationship. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68, 782–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R., III, & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 53, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Knutson, B., & McMahon, S. R. (1991). Polluting the stream of consciousness: The effect of thought suppression on the mind’s environment. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 15, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wegner, D. M., & Zanakos, S. (1994). Chronic thought suppression. Journal of Personality, 62, 615–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Whelan, R., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of same and opposite. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82, 177–195.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wulfert, E., & Hayes, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologySwansea UniversitySwanseaWales

Personalised recommendations