Learning & Behavior

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 62–66 | Cite as

Potentiation of taste and extract stimuli in conditioned flavor preference learning

Article

Abstract

In these experiments, we investigated the nature of potentiation in the conditioned flavor preference paradigm. Almond and banana extracts, which have strong odor components, were combined with salt and saccharin (liked tastes; Experiment 1) or quinine and citric acid (disliked tastes; Experiment 2) in a flavor preference procedure that mixed these solutions with a caloric reinforcer (polycose). The results showed that liked tastes potentiated preference conditioning to extracts (Experiment 1), whereas extracts potentiated preference conditioning to disliked tastes (Experiment 2). In both experiments, the presumably less liked stimulus (i.e., the extract in Experiment 1 and the disliked taste in Experiment 2) was the potentiated cue.

References

  1. Ackroff, K., Manza, L., & Sclafani, A. (1993). The rat’s preference for sucrose, polycose and their mixtures. Appetite, 21, 69–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouton, M. E., & Whiting, M. R. (1982). Simultaneous odor-taste and taste-taste compounds in poison-avoidance learning. Learning & Motivation, 13, 472–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Capaldi, E. D., Campbell, D. H., Sheffer, J. D., & Bradford, J. P. (1987). Conditioned flavor preferences based on delayed caloric consequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 150–155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Capaldi, E. D., & Hunter, M. J. (1994). Taste and odor in conditioned flavor preference learning. Learning & Behavior, 22, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Capaldi, E. D., Hunter, M. J., & Lyn, S. A. (1997). Conditioning with taste as the CS in conditioned flavor preference learning. Learning & Behavior, 25, 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, J. J., & Bernstein, I. L. (2006). Sensitization of salt appetite is associated with increased “wanting” but not “liking” of a salt reward in the sodium-deplete rat. Behavioral Neuroscience, 120, 206–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Coldwell, S. E., & Tordoff, M. G. (1993). Learned preferences for the flavor of salted food. Physiology & Behavior, 54, 999–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Durlach, P. J., & Rescorla, R. A. (1980). Potentiation rather than overshadowing in flavor-aversion learning: An analysis in terms of within-compound associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 6, 175–187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Holder, M. D. (1991). Conditioned preferences for the taste and odor components of flavors: Blocking but not overshadowing. Appetite, 17, 29–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Holman, E. W. (1975). Immediate and delayed reinforcers for flavor preferences in rats. Learning & Motivation, 6, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lucas, F., Azzara, A. V., & Sclafani, A. (1998). Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric polycose in rats: More concentrated polycose is not always more reinforcing. Physiology & Behavior, 63, 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCaughey, S. A., & Scott, T. R. (1998). The taste of sodium. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 22, 663–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mikulka, P. J., Pitts, E., & Philput, C. (1982). Overshadowing not potentiation in taste aversion conditioning. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 101–104.Google Scholar
  14. Palmerino, C. C., Rusiniak, K. W., & Garcia, J. (1980). Flavor-illness aversions: The peculiar roles of odor and taste in memory for poison. Science, 208, 753–755.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pearce, J. M. (2002). Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning. Learning & Behavior, 30, 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Privitera, G. J., & Capaldi, E. D. (2006). The basic tastants in aversion conditioning: Evidence for sensory preconditioning and not potentiation. Learning & Behavior, 34, 355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rescorla, R. A. (1973). Evidence for “unique stimulus” account of configural conditioning. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 85, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosellini, R. A., & Lashley, R. L. (1986). Conditioning of odors in compound with taste: A failure to observe potentiation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 55–58.Google Scholar
  19. Rusiniak, K. W., Hankins, W. G., Garcia, J., & Brett, L. P. (1979). Flavor-illness aversions: Potentiation of odor by taste in rats. Behavioral & Neural Biology, 25, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rusiniak, K. W., Palmerino, C. C., Rice, A. G., Forthman, D. L., & Garcia, J. (1982). Flavor-illness aversions: Potentiation of odor by taste with toxin but not shock in rats. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 96, 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Slotnick, B. M., Westbrook, F., & Darling, F. M. (1997). What the rat’s nose tells the rat’s mouth: Long delay aversion conditioning with aqueous odors and potentiation of taste by odors. Learning & Behavior, 25, 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Symonds, M., Hall, G., & Bailey, G. K. (2002). Perceptual learning with a sodium depletion procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 190–199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Tordoff, M. G., & Coldwell, S. E. (2002). Some failures of intragastric NaCl infusions to support flavor preference conditioning. Physiology & Behavior, 76, 511–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arizona State UniversityTempe
  2. 2.Office of the ProvostTempe

Personalised recommendations