Abstract
Zentall (2008) challenges Arantes and Grace’s (2008) failure to replicate Clement, Feltus, Kaiser, and Zentall (2000) by suggesting that our results may have been due to insufficient training or to subjects’ experimental histories, and that our results are actually consistent with those of Clement et al. when examined closely. On the contrary, our pigeons received more training than Clement et al.’s did, and when an overall measure of preference on test trials was calculated, independent of the effect of initiating event that we reported, there was no evidence of preference for the stimulus preceded by the greater response requirement in our data. Although there have now been two unsuccessful attempts to replicate Clement et al.’s work ethic effect, there is evidence that in some situations, the value of a stimulus, as assessed by transfer tests, varies inversely with the context of reinforcement. It is important to look for convergent results using other procedures and transfer tests, such as resistance to change, to identify the principles that determine when contrast manipulations affect value and when they do not.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arantes, J., & Grace, R. C. (2008). failure to obtain value enhancement by within-trial contrast in simultaneous and successive discriminations. Learning & Behavior, 36, 1–11.
Clement, T. S., Feltus, J. R., Kaiser, D. H., & Zentall, T. R. (2000). “Work ethic” in pigeons: Reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 100–106.
DiGian, K. A., Friedrich, A. M., & Zentall, T. R. (2004). Discriminative stimuli that follow a delay have added value for pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 889–895.
Friedrich, A. M., & Zentall, T. R. (2004). Pigeons shift their preference toward locations of food that take more effort to obtain. Behavioural Processes, 67, 405–415.
Grace, R. C., McLean, A. P., & Nevin, J. A. (2003). Reinforcement context and resistance to change. Behavioural Processes, 64, 91–101.
Grace, R. C., & Nevin, J. A. (1997). On the relation between preference and resistance to change. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 43–65.
Hearst, E., & Jenkins, H. M. (1974). Sign-tracking: The stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society.
Kacelnik, A., & Marsh, B. (2002). Cost can increase preference in starlings. Animal Behaviour, 63, 245–250.
Moore, J., & Fantino, E. (1975). Choice and response contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 23, 339–347.
Nevin, J. A. (1974). Response strength in multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 389–408.
Nevin, J. A. (1992). Behavioral contrast and behavioral momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 126–133.
Nevin, J. A., & Grace, R. C. (1999). Does the context of reinforcement affect resistance to change? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 256–268.
Nevin, J. A., & Grace, R. C. (2000). Behavioral momentum and the law of effect. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 73–130.
Pompilio, L., Kacelnik, A., & Behmer, S. T. (2006). State-dependent learned valuation drives choice in an invertebrate. Science, 311, 1613–1615.
Singer, R. A., Berry, L. M., & Zentall, T. R. (2007). Preference for a stimulus that follows a relatively aversive event: Contrast or delay reduction? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 275–285.
Vasconcelos, M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2008). Deprivation level and choice in pigeons: A test of within-trial contrast. Learning & Behavior, 36, 12–18.
Vasconcelos, M., Urcuioli, P. J., & Lionello-DeNolf, K. M. (2007). Failure to replicate the “work ethic” effect in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 383–399.
Zentall, T. R. (2008). Within-trial contrast: When you see it and when you don’t. Learning & Behavior, 36, 19–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
The first author was supported by a PhD fellowship from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arantes, J., Grace, R.C. Contrast and value: Beyond the work ethic effect. A reply to Zentall (2008). Learning & Behavior 36, 26–28 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.36.1.26
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.36.1.26