Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
  3. Article
P50 sensory gating is related to performance on select tasks of cognitive inhibition
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Children’s inhibition skills are associated with their P3a latency—results from an exploratory study

01 December 2022

Tanja Linnavalli, Outi Lahti, … Benjamin Ultan Cowley

Auditory selective attention under working memory load

04 November 2020

Rena Bayramova, Enrico Toffalini, … Massimo Grassi

No sound is more distracting than the one you're trying not to hear: delayed costs of mental control of task-irrelevant neutral and emotional sounds

21 February 2022

Örn Kolbeinsson, Erkin Asutay, … Hugo Hesser

Effects of stimulus intensity and auditory white noise on human somatosensory cognitive processing: a study using event-related potentials

24 November 2018

Haruka Mizukami, Ryusuke Kakigi & Hiroki Nakata

Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm

03 December 2019

Jürgen Kayser, Lidia Y. X. Wong, … John Jonides

Cognitive control in the cocktail party: Preparing selective attention to dichotically presented voices supports distractor suppression

19 December 2018

Sophie Nolden, Camellia N. Ibrahim & Iring Koch

An unperceived acoustic stimulus decreases reaction time to visual information in a patient with cortical deafness

02 April 2020

Anthony N. Carlsen, Dana Maslovat & Kimitaka Kaga

The First 250 ms of Auditory Processing: No Evidence of Early Processing Negativity in the Go/NoGo Task

04 March 2020

Jack S. Fogarty, Robert J. Barry & Genevieve Z. Steiner

Investigating the sex-dependent effects of prefrontal cortex stimulation on response execution and inhibition

17 August 2021

Daniel J. Fehring, Ranshikha Samandra, … Farshad A. Mansouri

Download PDF
  • Published: December 2009

P50 sensory gating is related to performance on select tasks of cognitive inhibition

  • Carly A. Yadon1,
  • Julie M. Bugg2,
  • Michael A. Kisley3 &
  • …
  • Deana B. Davalos1 

Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience volume 9, pages 448–458 (2009)Cite this article

  • 737 Accesses

  • 23 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

P50 suppression deficits have been documented in clinical and nonclinical populations, but the behavioral correlates of impaired auditory sensory gating remain poorly understood. In the present study, we examined the relationship between P50 gating and healthy adults’ performance on cognitive inhibition tasks. On the basis of load theory (Lavie, Hirst, de Fockert, & Viding, 2004), we predicted that a high perceptual load, a possible consequence of poor auditory P50 sensory gating, would have differential (i.e., positive vs. negative) effects on performance of cognitive inhibition tasks. A dissociation was observed such that P50 gating was negatively related to interference resolution on a Stroop task and positively related to response inhibition on a go/no-go task. Our findings support the idea that a high perceptual load may be beneficial to Stroop performance because of the reduced processing of distractors but detrimental to performance on the go/no-go task because of interference with stimulus discrimination.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Adler, L. E., Hoffer, L. J., Griffith, J., Waldo, M. C., & Freedman, R. (1992). Normalization by nicotine of deficient auditory sensory gating in the relatives of schizophrenics. Biological Psychiatry, 32, 607–616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, L. E., Waldo, M. C., & Freedman, R. (1985). Neurophysiologic studies of sensory gating in schizophrenia: Comparison of auditory and visual responses. Biological Psychiatry, 20, 1284–1296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arciniegas, D. B., Olincy, A., Topkoff, J., McRae, K., Cawthra, E., Filley, C. M., et al. (2000). Impaired auditory gating and P50 nonsuppression following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience, 12, 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arciniegas, D. B., Topkoff, J. L., Rojas, D. C., Sheeder, J., Teale, P., Young, D. A., et al. (2001). Reduced hippocampal volume in association with P50 nonsuppression following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience, 13, 213–221. doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13.2.213

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnfred, S. M., Eder, D. N., Hemmingsen, R. P., Glenthøj, B. Y., & Chen, A. C. N. (2001). Gating of the vertex somatosensory and auditory evoked potential P50 and the correlation to skin conductance orienting response in healthy men. Psychiatry Research, 101, 221–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., Hachten, P. C., Usher, M., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). The “benefits” of distractibility: Mechanisms underlying increased Stroop effects in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 25, 749–762.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnhardt, J., Ritter, W., & Gomes, H. (2008). Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: An eventrelated brain potential study. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2071–2078. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickford-Wimer, P. C., Nagamoto, H., Johnson, R., Adler, L. E., Egan, M., Rose, G. M., & Freedman, R. (1990). Auditory sensory gating in hippocampal neurons: A model system in the rat. Biological Psychiatry, 27, 183–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76–106). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, J. M., & McDowd, J. M. (1999). Aging and selective attention: An issue of complexity or multiple mechanisms? Journals of Gerontology, 54B, P30-P33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumback, C. R., Low, K. A., Gratton, G., & Fabiani, M. (2004). Sensory ERPs predict differences in working memory span and fluid intelligence. NeuroReport, 15, 373–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clementz, B. A., Geyer, M. A., & Braff, D. L. (1998). Poor P50 suppression among schizophrenia patients and their first-degree biological relatives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 1691–1694.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. D., Barch, D. M., Carter, C., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1999). Context-processing deficits in schizophrenia: Converging evidence from three theoretically motivated cognitive tasks. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 120–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Croft, R. J., Lee, A., Bertolot, J., & Gruzelier, J. H. (2001). Associations of P50 suppression and desensitization with perceptual and cognitive features of “unreality]rd in schizotypy. Biological Psychiatry, 50, 441–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cullum, C. M., Harris, J. G., Waldo, M. C., Smernoff, E., Madison, A., Nagamoto, H. T., et al. (1993). Neurophysiological and neuropsychological evidence for attentional dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 10, 131–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Wilde, O. M., Bour, L. J., Dingemans, P. M., Koelman, J. H. T. M., & Linszen, D. H. (2007). A meta-analysis of P50 studies in patients with schizophrenia and relatives: Differences in methodology between research groups. Schizophrenia Research, 97, 137–151. doi:10.1016/ j.schres.2007.04.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donders, F. C. (1969). On the speed of mental processes. In W. G. Koster (Ed. & Trans.), Attention and performance II (pp. 412–431). Amsterdam: North-Holland. (Original work published 1868)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters on the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, R. J., Turetsky, B. I., Moberg, P., Gur, R. C., & Gur, R. E. (1998). P50 abnormalities in schizophrenia: Relationship to clinical and neuropsychological indices of attention. Schizophrenia Research, 33, 157–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, J., Laplante, L., & Thomas, J. (1989). The selective attention deficit in schizophrenia: Limited resources or cognitive fatigue? Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 177, 735–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R., Coon, H., Myles-Worsley, M., Orr-Urtreger, A., Olincy, A., Davis, A., et al. (1997). Linkage of a neurophysiological deficit in schizophrenia to a chromosome 15 locus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 587–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuerst, D. R., Gallinat, J., & Boutros, N. N. (2007). Range of sensory gating values and test-retest reliability in normal subjects. Psychophysiology, 44, 620–626. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00524.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisolfi, E. S., Heldt, E., Zanardo, A. P., Strimitzer, I. M., Jr., Prokopiuk, A. S., Becker, J., et al. (2006). P50 sensory gating in panic disorder. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 40, 535–540. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, D. C., Braun, J. G., & Studer, J. A. (2006). Attentional network task performance in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: Evidence of a specific deficit. Schizophrenia Research, 88, 169–178. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2006.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003). The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 636–645. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, T., Boutros, N. N., Pezer, N., von Oertzen, J., Fernández, G., Schaller, C., & Elger, C. E. (2003). Neuronal substrates of sensory gating within the human brain. Biological Psychiatry, 53, 511–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guterman, Y., & Josiassen, R. C. (1994). Sensory gating deviance in schizophrenia in the context of task related effects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guterman, Y., Josiassen, R. C., & Bashore, T. R., Jr. (1992). Attentional influence on the P50 component of the auditory eventrelated brain potential. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 12, 197–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, L., & Johnson, J. T., Jr. (1970). Inhibition deficits in retardate learning and attention. In N. Ellis, P. Siegel, & I. Bjorgen (Eds.), International review of research in mental retardation (pp. 107–149). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, M. K., Campbell, K. L., & Hasher, L. (2008). Cognitive aging and increased distractibility: Costs and potential benefits. Progress in Brain Research, 169, 353–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jerger, K., Biggins, C., & Fein, G. (1992). P50 suppression is not affected by attentional manipulations. Biological Psychiatry, 31, 365–377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jessen, F., Kucharski, C., Fries, T., Papassotiropoulos, A., Hoenig, K., Maier, W., & Heun, R. (2001). Sensory gating deficit expressed by a disturbed suppression of the P50 event-related potential in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1319–1321. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.8.1319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kisley, M. A., Noecker, T. L., & Guinther, P. M. (2004). Comparison of sensory gating to mismatch negativity and self-reported perceptual phenomena in healthy adults. Psychophysiology, 41, 604–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. T., Staines, W. R., Swick, D., & Chao, L. L. (1999). Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks. Acta Psychologica, 101, 159–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korzyukov, O., Pflieger, M. E., Wagner, M., Bowyer, S. M., Rosburg, T., Sundaresan, K., et al. (2007). Generators of the intracranial P50 response in auditory sensory gating. NeuroImage, 35, 814–826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology & Aging, 9, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.9.4.491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurthen, M., Trautner, P., Rosburg, T., Grunwald, T., Dietl, T., Kühn, K., et al. (2007). Toward a functional topography of sensory gating areas: Invasive P50 recording and electrical stimulation mapping in epilepsy surgery candidates. Psychiatry Research, 155, 121–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Làdavas, E., Petronio, A., & Umiltà, C. (1990). The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients. Cortex, 26, 307–317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 451–468. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339–354. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludbrook, J. (1998). Multiple comparison procedures updated. Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology, 25, 1032–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lustig, C., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a “new view.” In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 145–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11587-008

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luu, P., & Ferree, T. (2005). Determination of the Geodesic Sensor Nets’ average electrode positions and their 10-10 international equivalents. (Tech. Note). Eugene, OR: Electrical Geodesics, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 126–135. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.1.126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlow-O’Conner, M. A. (2005). f MRI indices of frontal activation associated with sensory gating deficits in schizophrenia. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66B, 3417.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhie, A., & Chapman, J. (1961). Disorders of attention and perception in early schizophrenia. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 34, 103–116.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagamoto, H. T., Adler, L. E., Hea, R. A., Griffith, J. M., McRae, K. A., & Freedman, R. (1996). Gating of auditory P50 in schizophrenics: Unique effects of clozapine. Biological Psychiatry, 40, 181–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagamoto, H. T., Adler, L. E., Waldo, M. C., Griffith, J., & Freedman, R. (1991). Gating of auditory response in schizophrenics and normal controls. Effects of recording site and stimulation interval on the P50 wave. Schizophrenia Research, 4, 31–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nee, D. E., Wager, T. D., & Jonides, J. (2007). Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibition and facilitation processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 444–450. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.3.3.444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olincy, A., Ross, R. G., Harris, J. G., Young, D. A., McAndrews, M. A., Cawthra, E., et al. (2000). The P50 auditory event-related potential in adult attention-deficit disorder: Comparison with schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 47, 969–977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J. V., Hetrick, W. P., Boutros, N. N., Jin, Y., Sandman, C., Stern, H., et al. (2008). P50 sensory gating ratios in schizophrenics and controls: A review and data analysis. Psychiatry Research, 158, 226–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Persons, J. B. (1986). The advantages of studying psychological phenomena rather than psychiatric diagnoses. American Psychologist, 41, 1252–1260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, N., & Strick, P. L. (2001). Imaging the premotor areas. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 663–672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Picton, T. W., Stuss, D. T., Alexander, M. P., Shallice, T., Binns, M. A., & Gillingham, S. (2007). Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 826–838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, D., Summerfelt, A., Gold, J., & Buchanan, R. W. (2006). Review of clinical correlates of P50 sensory gating abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32, 692–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S., Vuilleumier, P., Hutton, C., Maravita, A., Dolan, R. J., & Driver, J. (2005). Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: Modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 770–786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. A., Boutros, N. N., & Schwarzkopf, S. B. (1994). Reliability of P50 auditory event-related potential indices of sensory gating. Psychophysiology, 31, 495–502. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb01053.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, C., Haworth, E. J., Peters, E., Hemsley, D. R., Sharma, T., Gray, J. A., et al. (2001). Neuroimaging correlates of negative priming. NeuroReport, 12, 3619–3624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi:10.1037/ h0054651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talay-Ongan, A., & Wood, K. (2000). Unusual sensory sensitivities in autism: A possible crossroads. International Journal of Disability Development & Education, 47, 201–212. doi:10.1080/713671112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibition priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tregellas, J. R., Davalos, D. B., Rojas, D. C., Waldo, M. C., Gibson, L., Wylie, K., et al. (2007). Increased hemodynamic response in the hippocampus, thalamus and prefrontal cortex during abnormal sensory gating in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 92, 262–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uc, E. Y., Skinner, R. D., Rodnitzky, R. L., & Garcia-Rill, E. (2003). The midlatency auditory evoked potential P50 is abnormal in Huntington’s disease. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 212, 1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Venables, P. H. (1964). Input dysfunction in schizophrenia. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 72, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldo, M. C., Cawthra, E., Adler, L. E., Dubester, S., Staunton, M., Nagamoto, H., et al. (1994). Auditory sensory gating, hippocampal volume, and catecholamine metabolism in schizophrenics and their siblings. Schizophrenia Research, 12, 93–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, M., Kiefer, M., Marzinzik, F., & Spitzer, M. (2000). Executive control is disturbed in schizophrenia: Evidence from event- related potentials in a go/no-go task. Biological Psychiatry, 47, 51–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisser, R., Weisbrod, M., Roehrig, M., Rupp, A., Schroeder, J., & Scherg, M. (2001). Is frontal lobe involved in the generation of the auditory evoked P50? NeuroReport, 12, 3303–3307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. I., Keuthen, N. J., Savage, C. R., Martis, B., Williams, D., Wedig, M., et al. (2006). Brain correlates of negative and positive visuospatial priming in adults. NeuroImage, 30, 983–991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, 1876 Campus Delivery, 80521, Ft. Collins, CO

    Carly A. Yadon & Deana B. Davalos

  2. Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri

    Julie M. Bugg

  3. University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Colorado

    Michael A. Kisley

Authors
  1. Carly A. Yadon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julie M. Bugg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael A. Kisley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Deana B. Davalos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carly A. Yadon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yadon, C.A., Bugg, J.M., Kisley, M.A. et al. P50 sensory gating is related to performance on select tasks of cognitive inhibition. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 9, 448–458 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.4.448

Download citation

  • Received: 30 September 2008

  • Accepted: 01 July 2009

  • Issue Date: December 2009

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.4.448

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Schizophrenia
  • Negative Priming
  • Stroop Task
  • Perceptual Load
  • Flanker Task
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 167.114.118.212

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.