Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
  3. Article
Effects of anxiety on task switching: Evidence from the mixed antisaccade task
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

The impact of cognitive load on processing efficiency and performance effectiveness in anxiety: evidence from event-related potentials and pupillary responses

17 January 2019

Piril Hepsomali, Julie A. Hadwin, … Matthew Garner

Trait Anxiety and Attention: Cognitive Functioning as a Function of Attentional Demands

04 June 2018

Rotem Leshem

Assessing anxiety-linked impairment in attentional control without eye-tracking: The masked-target antisaccade task

15 March 2022

Julian Basanovic, Jemma Todd, … Patrick J. F. Clarke

Processing the peripheral distractor in test anxiety: the effects of perceptual load and cognitive load

07 June 2022

Cenlou Hu, Tian Po Oei, … Renlai Zhou

Too anxious to control: the relation between math anxiety and inhibitory control processes

16 November 2020

E. Van den Bussche, K. Vanmeert, … D. Sasanguie

The influence of threat on the efficiency of goal-directed attentional control

28 March 2020

Andy Jeesu Kim, David S. Lee & Brian A. Anderson

Attentional bias towards negative stimuli in healthy individuals and the effects of trait anxiety

16 July 2020

Emilie Veerapa, Pierre Grandgenevre, … Fabien D’Hondt

Early vigilance and improved processing efficiency to the test-related target in test anxiety: Evidence from the visual search task and eye-movements

09 November 2021

Cenlou Hu, Tian Po Oei, … Renlai Zhou

The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching: a diffusion model analysis

08 June 2019

Agnieszka W. Kowalczyk & James A. Grange

Download PDF
  • Published: September 2008

Effects of anxiety on task switching: Evidence from the mixed antisaccade task

  • Tahereh L. Ansari1,
  • Nazanin Derakshan1 &
  • Anne Richards1 

Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience volume 8, pages 229–238 (2008)Cite this article

  • 2693 Accesses

  • 95 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

According to the attentional control theory of anxiety (Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos, & Calvo, 2007), anxiety impairs performance on cognitive tasks that involve the shifting function of working memory. This hypothesis was tested using a mixed antisaccade paradigm, in which participants performed single-task and mixed-task versions of the paradigm. The single task involved the completion of separate blocks of anti- and prosaccade trials, whereas in the mixed task, participants completed anti- and prosaccade trials in a random order within blocks. Analysis of switch costs showed that high-anxious individuals did not exhibit the commonly reported paradoxical improvement in saccade latency, whereas low-anxious individuals did. The findings are discussed within the framework of attentional control theory.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

References

  • Baddeley, A. [D.] (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Chincotta, D., & Adlam, A. (2001). Working memory and the control of action: Evidence from task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 641–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, J. J. S., Cherkasova, M. V., Lindgren, K. A., Goff, D. C., Intriligator, J., & Manoach, D. S. (2002). Antisaccade and task switching: Studies of control processing in saccadic function in normal subjects and schizophrenic patients. In H. J. Kaminsk & R. J. Leigh (Eds.), Neurobiology of eye movements: From molecules to behavior (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 956, pp. 250–263). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, S. J. (2007). Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: An integrative account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 307–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, S. [J.], Duncan, J., Brett, M., & Lawrence, A. D. (2004). Prefrontal cortical function and anxiety: Controlling attention to threat-related stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 184–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, A. J., Shine, P., & Bruce, M. (1995). Validation of visual analogue scales in anxiety. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 5, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherkasova, M. V., Manoach, D. S., Intriligator, J. M., & Barton, J. J. S. (2002). Antisaccades and task-switching: Interactions in controlled processing. Experimental Brain Research, 144, 528–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven activation in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R., Berendsen, E., & Cools, R. (1999). Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: Dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situation. Acta Psychologica, 101, 379–394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derakshan, N., Ansari, T. L., Hansard, M., Shoker, L., & Eysenck, M. W. (in press). tAnxiety and inhibition: An investigation using the antisaccade task. Experimental Psychology.

  • Derakshan, N., & Eysenck, M. W. (1998). Working memory capacity in high trait-anxious and repressor groups. Cognition & Emotion, 12, 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 225–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliman, N. A., Green, M. W., Rogers, P. J., & Finch, G. M. (1997). Processing-efficiency theory and the working-memory system: Impairments associated with sub-clinical anxiety. Personality & Individual Differences, 23, 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettinger, U., Ffytche, D. H., Kumari, V., Kathmann, N., Reuter, B., Zelaya, F., & Williams, S. C. R. (2008). Decomposing the neural correlates of antisaccade eye-movements using event-related fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1148–1159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 409–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: The processing efficiency theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., Payne, S., & Derakshan, N. (2005). Trait anxiety, visuospatial processing, and working memory. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 1214–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Window display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., Russo, R., & Dutton, K. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 355–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garavan, H., Hester, R., Murphy, K., Fassbender, C., & Kelly, C. (2006). Individual differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control. Brain Research, 1105, 130–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallet, P. E. (1978). Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research, 18, 1279–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. M., & Cumming, S. R. (2003). An examination of the relationship between anxiety and performance on prospective and retrospective memory tasks. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55, 51–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herath, P., Klingburg, T., Young, J., Amunts, K., & Roland, R. (2001). Neural correlates of dual task interference can be dissociated from those of divided attention: An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 796–805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, R., & Garavan, H. (2005). Working memory and executive function: The influence of content and load on the control of attention. Memory & Cognition, 33, 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, T. L., Golding, C., Molyva, D., Rosenthal, C. R., & Kennard, C. (2004). Eye movement during task switching: Reflexive, symbolic, and affective contributions to response selection. Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 318–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, S. B., & Ettinger, U. (2006). The antisaccade task as a research tool in psychopathology: A critical review. Psychophysiology, 43, 302–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kray, J. (2006). Task-set switching under cue-based versus memorybased switching conditions in younger and older adults. Brain Research, 1105, 83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjansson, A. J., Chen, Y., & Nakayama, K. (2001). Less attention is more, in preparation of antisaccade but not prosaccades. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1037–1042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LC Technology, Inc. (2003). Eyegaze development system: Development manual. Fairfax, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (2004). Working memory, task switching, and executive control in task span procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 218–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manoach, D. S., Lindgren, K. A., Cherkasova, M. V., Goff, D. C., Halpern, E. F., Intriligator, J., & Barton, J. J. S. (2002). Schizophrenic patients show deficit inhibition but intact task-switching on saccadic tasks. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 816–826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massen, C. (2004). Parallel programming of exogenous and endogenous components in the antisaccade task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 475–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1423–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis, S., Broerse, A., Nielen, M. M. A., & Jong, R. D. (2004). A goal activation approach to the study of executive function: An application to antisaccade tasks. Brain & Cognition, 56, 198–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. (2001). Attention and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 629–651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, B., Jäger, M., Bottlender, R., & Kathmann, N. (2007). Impaired action control in schizophrenia: The role of volitional saccade initiation. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1840–1848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 763–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. C., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63–101). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Attention and Emotion Lab, School of Psychology, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, WC1E 7HX, London, England

    Tahereh L. Ansari, Nazanin Derakshan & Anne Richards

Authors
  1. Tahereh L. Ansari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nazanin Derakshan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anne Richards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nazanin Derakshan.

Additional information

The present work was supported by an ESRC Ph.D. studentship awarded to T.L.A. and was carried out under the supervision of N.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ansari, T.L., Derakshan, N. & Richards, A. Effects of anxiety on task switching: Evidence from the mixed antisaccade task. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 8, 229–238 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.8.3.229

Download citation

  • Received: 30 November 2007

  • Accepted: 30 March 2008

  • Issue Date: September 2008

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.8.3.229

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Switch Cost
  • Attentional Control
  • Switch Trial
  • Antisaccade Task
  • Prosaccade Task
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 3.236.24.215

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.