Abstract
Using event-related potentials (ERPs), we examined the relative contributions of familiarity and recollection to recognition memory for items and their study contexts in school-aged children and adults. Whereas adults were able to selectively accept target items and to reject familiar nontarget items in an exclusion task, this discrimination was more difficult for children, as was evident in the high false alarm rates to nontargets even when item memory was controlled for. The analysis of the adults’ ERPs revealed more flexible and task-appropriate retrieval mechanisms, as was evident in the correlates of familiarity, recollection, and nontarget retrieval, as well as in postretrieval evaluation. In contrast, children’s ERPs revealed a parietal old/new effect for targets taken as a putative correlate of recollection. These findings suggest that children rely predominantly on recollection during recognition judgments, even in the absence of efficient memory control processes. The latter processes enable adults to monitor and verify the retrieved information and to control nontarget retrieval in the service of adequate source memory performance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Billingsley, R. L., Smith, M. L., & McAndrews, M. P. (2002). Developmental patterns in priming and familiarity in explicit recollection. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 251–277.
Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., Curran, T. E., & Miller, M. B. (1994). Do children and the elderly show heightened semantic priming? How to answer the question. Developmental Review, 14, 159–185.
Clark, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20, 231–243.
Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 923–938.
Curran, T., & Cleary, A. M. (2003). Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 191–205.
Curran, T., & Dien, J. (2003). Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality-specific memory processes: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 40, 979–988.
Cycowicz, Y. M. (2000). Memory development and event-related brain potentials in children. Biological Psychology, 54, 145–174.
Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., & Duff, M. (2003). Pictures and their colors: What do children remember? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 759–768.
Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Duff, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (2001). Recognition and source memory for pictures in children and adults. Neuropsychologia, 39, 255–267.
Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 171–237.
Czernochowski, D., Brinkmann, M., Mecklinger, A., & Johansson, M. (2004). When binding matters: An ERP analysis of the development of recollection and familiarity. In A. Mecklinger, H. Zimmer, & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Bound in memory: Insights from behavioral and neuropsychological studies (pp. 93–128). Aachen: Shaker.
Dobbins, I. G., Foley, H., Schacter, D. L., & Wagner, A. D. (2002). Executive control during episodic retrieval: Multiple prefrontal processes subserve source memory. Neuron, 35, 989–996.
Dobbins, I. G., Simons, J. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2004). fMRI evidence for separable and lateralized prefrontal memory monitoring processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 908–920.
Dywan, J., Segalowitz, S. J., & Arsenault, A. (2002). Electrophysiological response during source memory decisions in older and younger adults. Brain & Cognition, 49, 322–340.
Dywan, J., Segalowitz, S. J., & Webster, L. (1998). Source monitoring: ERP evidence for greater reactivity to nontarget information in older adults. Brain & Cognition, 36, 390–430.
Dywan, J., Segalowitz, S. J., Webster, L., Hendry, K., & Harding, J. (2001). Event-related potential evidence for age-related differences in attentional allocation during a source monitoring task. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19, 99–120.
Friedman, D. (1992). Event-related potential investigations of cognitive development and aging. In D. Friedman & G. Bruder (Eds.), Psychophysiology and experimental psychopathology: A tribute to Samuel Sutton (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 658, pp. 33–64). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Friedman, D. (2000). Event-related brain potential investigation of memory and aging. Biological Psychology, 54, 175–206.
Friedman, D., & Johnson, R., Jr. (2000). Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review. Microscopy Research & Technique, 51, 6–28.
Gathercole, S. E. (1998). The development of memory. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 39, 3–27.
Giles, J. W., Gopnik, A., & Heyman, G. D. (2002). Source monitoring reduces the suggestibility of preschool children. Psychological Science, 13, 288–291.
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468–484.
Hayes, B., & Heit, E. (2004). Why learning and development can lead to poorer recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 337–339.
Herron, J. E., & Rugg, M. (2003). Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 843–854.
Jacoby, L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513–541.
Johansson, M., & Mecklinger, A. (2003). The late posterior negativity in ERP studies of episodic memory: Action monitoring and retrieval of item attribute conjunctions. Biological Psychology, 64, 91–117.
Johnson, M., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.
Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Marshall, D. H., Drummey, A. B., Fox, N. A., & Newcombe, N. S. (2002). An event-related potential study of item recognition memory in children and adults. Journal of Cognition & Development, 3, 201–224.
Mayes, A. R., Holdstock, J. S., Isaac, C. L., Hunkin, N. M., & Roberts, N. (2002). Relative sparing of item recognition memory in a patient with adult-onset damage limited to the hippocampus. Hippocampus, 12, 325–340.
Mecklinger, A. (2000). Interfacing mind and brain: A neurocognitive model of recognition memory. Psychophysiology, 37, 565–582.
Mecklinger, A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Matthes-von Cramon, G. (1998). Event-related potential evidence for a specific recognition memory deficit in adult survivors of cerebral hypoxia. Brain, 121, 1919–1935.
Moscovitch, M. (1995). Models of consciousness and memory. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1341–1356). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nessler, D., Mecklinger, A., & Penney, T. B. (2001). Event related brain potentials and illusory memories: The effects of differential encoding. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 283–301.
Nessler, D., Mecklinger, A., & Penney, T. B. (2005). Perceptual fluency, semantic familiarity, and recognition-related familiarity: An eletrophysiological exploration. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 265–288.
Nolde, S. F., Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1998). The role of prefrontal cortex during tests of episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 399–406.
O’Neill, D. K., & Gopnik, A. (1991). Young children’s ability to identify the sources of their beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 27, 390–397.
Ranganath, C. (2004). The 3-D prefrontal cortex: Hemispheric asymmetries in prefrontal activity and their relation to memory retrieval processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 903–907.
Ranganath, C., & Paller, K. A. (1999). Frontal brain potentials during recognition are modulated by requirements to retrieve perceptual detail. Neuron, 22, 605–613.
Ranganath, C., & Paller, K. A. (2000). Neural correlates of memory retrieval and evaluation. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 209–222.
Roebers, C. M. (2002). Confidence judgments in children’s and adults’ event recall and suggestibility. Developmental Psychology, 38, 1052–1067.
Roebers, C. M., & Howie, P. (2003). Confidence judgments in event recall: Developmental progression in the impact of question format. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 352–371.
Ruffman, T., Rustin, C., Garnham, W., & Parkin, A. (2001). Source monitoring and false memories in children: Relation to certainty and executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 95–111.
Rugg, M. D., Mark, R. E., Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Birch, C. S., & Allan, K. (1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature, 392, 595–598.
Schnider, A. (2003). Spontaneous confabulation and the adaptation of thought to ongoing reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 662–671.
Shimamura, A. (2002). Memory retrieval and executive control processes. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 210–220). New York: Oxford University Press.
Simons, J. S., & Spiers, H. J. (2003). Prefrontal and medial temporal lobe interactions in long-term memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 637–648.
Simons, J. S., Verfaellie, M., Galton, C. J., Miller, B. L., Hodges, J. R., & Graham, K. S. (2002). Recollection-based memory in frontotemporal dementia: Implications for theories of long-term memory. Brain, 125, 2523–2536.
Smith, M. E., & Halgren, E. (1989). Dissociations of recognition memory components following temporal lobe lesions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 50–60.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174–215.
Sowell, E., Delis, D., Stiles, J., & Jernigan, T. (2001). Improved memory functioning and frontal lobe maturation between childhood and adolescence. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 312–322.
Trott, C. T., Friedman, D., Ritter, W., Fabiani, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1999). Episodic priming and memory for temporal source: Event-related potentials reveal age-related differences in prefrontal functioning. Psychology & Aging, 14, 390–413.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 1–12.
Vaidya, C. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). Picture superiority in conceptual memory: Dissociative effects of encoding and retrieval tasks. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1165–1172.
Wagner, A. (2002). Cognitive control and episodic memory: Contributions from prefrontal cortex. In L. Squire & D. Schacter (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory (pp. 174–192). New York: Guilford.
Wilding, E. L. (2000). In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 35, 81–87.
Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain, 119, 889–905.
Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1997). Event-related potentials and the recognition memory exclusion task. Neuropsychologia, 35, 119–128.
Wilding, E. L., & Sharpe, H. (2004). The influence of response-time demands on electrophysiological correlates of successful episodic retrieval. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 185–195.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 441–517.
Yovel, G., & Paller, K. A. (2004). The neural basis of the butcher-onthe-bus phenomenon: When a face seems familiar but is not remembered. NeuroImage, 21, 789–800.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Czernochowski, D., Mecklinger, A., Johansson, M. et al. Age-related differences in familiarity and recollection: ERP evidence from a recognition memory study in children and young adults. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 5, 417–433 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.4.417
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.4.417