Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
  3. Article

Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension

  • Published: September 2005
  • Volume 5, pages 263–281, (2005)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension
Download PDF
  • Jared M. Novick1,
  • John C. Trueswell1 &
  • Sharon L. Thompson-Schill1 
  • 3966 Accesses

  • 412 Citations

  • 9 Altmetric

  • 1 Mention

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

A century of investigation into the role of the human frontal lobes in complex cognition, including language processing, has revealed several interesting but apparently contradictory findings. In particular, the results of numerous studies suggest that left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG), which includes Broca’s area, plays a direct role in sentence-level syntactic processing. In contrast, other brain-imaging and neuropsychological data indicate that LIFG is crucial for cognitive control—specifically, for overriding highly regularized, automatic processes, even when a task involves syntactically undemanding material (e.g., single words, a list of letters). We provide a unifying account of these findings, which emphasizes the importance of general cognitive control mechanisms for the syntactic processing of sentences. On the basis of a review of the neurocognitive and sentence-processing literatures, we defend the following three hypotheses: (1) LIFG is part of a network of frontal lobe subsystems that are generally responsible for the detection and resolution of incompatible stimulus representations; (2) the role of LIFG in sentence comprehension is to implement reanalysis in the face of misinterpretation; and (3) individual differences in cognitive control abilities in nonsyntactic tasks predict correlated variation in sentence-processing abilities pertaining to the recovery from misinterpretation.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Morpho-Functional Basis of Complex Sentence Processing in Adults and Children

Article 01 May 2020

E. P. Stankova, D. M. Guillemard & E. I. Galperina

Is There a Brain Basis of Recursion?

Chapter © 2014

The dynamic influence of emotional words on sentence comprehension: An ERP study

Article 01 February 2016

Jinfeng Ding, Lin Wang & Yufang Yang

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Amunts, K., Schleicher, A., Bürgel, U., Mohlberg, H., Uylings, H. B. M., & Zilles, K. (1999). Broca’s region revisited: Cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 412, 319–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. [D.] (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, J. E., & Blodgett, A. (2001). Understanding the constraints on syntactic generation: Lexical bias and discourse congruency effects on eye movements. Journal of Memory & Language, 45, 391–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, J. E., & Cutler, A. (1996). Interaction with autonomy: Multiple output models and the inadequacy of the Great Divide. Cognition, 58, 309–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539–546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2004). Selection for cognitive control: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study on the selection of task-relevant information. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 8847–8852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Britt, M. A. (1994). The interaction of referential ambiguity and argument structure in the parsing of prepositional phrases. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 251–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broca, P. P. (1861). Loss of speech, chronic softening and partial destruction of the anterior left lobe of the brain (Christopher D. Green, Trans.). Retrieved September 10, 2003, from http://psychclassics. yorku.ca. Bulletin de la Société Anthropologique, 2, 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, S. A., Dudukovic, N. M., Thomason, M. E., Vaidya, C. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2002). Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: Evidence from fMRI. Neuron, 33, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. N., & Bowe, T. (1983). Text and context in early language comprehension. In M. Donaldson, R. Grieve, & C. Pratt (Eds.), Early childhood development and education (pp. 115–126). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D. (1995). Issues arising in contemporary studies of disorders of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension in agrammatic patients. Brain & Language, 50, 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D., Alpert, N., Waters, G., & Olivieri, A. (2000). Activation of Broca’s area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation. Human Brain Mapping, 9, 65–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D., & Waters, G. (2002). Working memory and connectionist models of parsing: A reply to MacDonald and Christiansen (2002). Psychological Review, 109, 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1988). Thematic roles and language comprehension. In W. Wilkins (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 21. Thematic relations (pp. 263–289). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747–749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, C., Traxler, M. J., Mohamed, M. T., Williams, R. S., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (2003). The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81, 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., Posner, M. I., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Localization of a neural system for error detection and compensation. Science, 5, 303–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Esposito, M., & Postle, B. R. (1999). The dependence of span and delayed-response performance on prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1303–1315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A., & Doar, B. (1989). The performance of human infants on a measure of frontal cortex function, the delayed response task. Developmental Psychobiology, 22, 271–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A., & Taylor, C. (1997). Development of an aspect of executive control: Development of the abilities to remember what I said and to “Do as I say, not as I do.” Developmental Psychobiology, 29, 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, F., Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., Utman, J., Dronkers, N., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2001). Language deficits, localization, and grammar: Evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals. Psychological Review, 108, 759–788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, M. J. (2004). Children’s difficulty in learning homonyms. Journal of Child Language, 31, 203–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D. P., Van Valin, R. D., Jr., Redfern, B. B., & Jaeger, J. J. (2004). Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition, 92, 145–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durston, S., Thomas, K. M., Yang, Y., Uluĝ, A. M., Zimmerman, R. D., & Casey, B. J. (2002). A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control. Developmental Science, 5, F9-F16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F., Christianson, K., & Hollingworth, A. (2001). Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: Implications for models of reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 3–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). The use of verb information in syntactic parsing: A comparison of evidence from eye movements and self-paced word-by-word reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiebach, C. J., Vos, S. H., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1562–1575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, P. C., Shallice, T., Frith, C. D., Frackowiak, R. S., & Dolan, R. J. (1996). Brain activity during memory retrieval: The influence of imagery and semantic cueing. Brain, 119, 1587–1596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garavan, H., Ross, T. J., Murphy, K., Roche, R. A. P., & Stein, E. A. (2002). Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: Inhibition, error detection, and correction. NeuroImage, 17, 1820–1829.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 58–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring, W. J., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Prefrontal—cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 516–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1993). Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Science, 4, 294–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R. (1995). Reading skill and suppression revisited. Psychological Science, 6, 165–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 1–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagoort, P. (2003). How the brain solves the binding problem for language. Manuscript from a position paper presented at the 9th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Glasgow, Scotland.

  • Hagoort, P., Wassenaar, M., & Brown, C. (2003). Real-time semantic compensation in patients with agrammatic comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence for multiple-route plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 4340–4345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A. C., & Martin, R. C. (2005). Dissociations among tasks involving inhibition: A single-case study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurewitz, F., Brown-Schmidt, S., Thorpe, K., Gleitman, L. R., & Trueswell, J. C. (2001). One frog, two frog, red frog, blue frog: Factors affecting children’s syntactic choices in production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 597–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, P. R., & Dabholkar, A. S. (1997). Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 387, 167–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Indefrey, P., Hellwig, F., Herzog, H., Seitz, R. J., & Hagoort, P. (2004). Neural responses to the production and comprehension of syntax in identical utterances. Brain & Language, 89, 312–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., Marshuetz, C., Koeppe, R. A., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (1998). Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 8410–8413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A. K., & Schabes, Y. (1997). Tree-adjoining grammars. In G. Rozenberg & A. Salomaa (Eds.), Handbook of formal languages (pp. 69–124). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Keller, T. A. (1996). The capacity theory of comprehension: New frontiers of evidence and arguments. Psychological Review, 103, 773–780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2002). The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 350–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A.W., III, Cho, R.Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate, conflict monitoring, and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023–1026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A. E., Srinivas, B., & Trueswell, J. C. (2002). The convergence of lexicalist perspectives in psycholinguistics and computational linguistics. In P. Merlo & S. Stevenson (Eds.), The lexical basis of sentence processing: Formal, computational, and experimental perspectives (pp. 109–135). Philadelphia: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. (1996). Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 93–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luciana, M., & Nelson, C. A. (1998). The functional emergence of prefrontally guided working memory systems in four- to eight-yearold children. Neuropsychologia, 36, 273–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A.W., III, Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. C. (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language & Cognitive Processes, 9, 157–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. A., Just, M. A., Keller, T. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (2003). Ambiguity in the brain: What brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1319–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzocco, M. M. M. (1997). Children’s interpretations of homonyms: A developmental study. Journal of Child Language, 24, 441–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McElree, B. M., & Dosher, B. A. (1989). Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 346–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in online sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 283–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, A. (2002). Individual differences in ambiguity resolution: Working memory and inhibition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University.

  • Metzler, C. (2001). Effects of left frontal lesions on the selection of context-appropriate meanings. Neuropsychology, 15, 315–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milham, M. P., Banich, M. T., & Barad, V. (2003). Competition for priority in processing increases prefrontal cortex’s involvement in top-down control: An event-related fMRI study of the Stroop task. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 212–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milham, M. P., Banich, M. T., Webb, A., Barad, V., Cohen, N. J., Wszalek, T., & Kramer, A. F. (2001). The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 467–473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1994). Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity: Maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 175–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S. (1978). Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 465–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathaniel-James, D. A., & Frith, C. D. (2002). The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: Evidence from the effects of contextual constraint in a sentence completion task. NeuroImage, 16, 1094–1102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. K., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Sylvester, C. C., Jonides, J., & Smith, E. E. (2003). Dissociable neural mechanisms underlying response-based and familiarity-based conflict in working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 11171–11175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newport, E. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noppeney, U., & Price, C. J. (2004). An f MRI study of syntactic adaptation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 702–713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Novick, J. M., January, D., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2004). Prefrontal cortex and the role of selectional processes in language comprehension: Frogs, napkins, and Broca’s area. Poster presented at the 17th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Baltimore.

  • Novick, J. M., Kim, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). Studying the grammatical aspects of word recognition: Lexical priming, parsing, and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 57–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., January, D., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2004). The role of conflict resolution in parsing: Measuring individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution and executive control. Paper presented at the 10th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms in Language Processing, Aix-en-Provence, France.

  • Pearson, D. A., & Lane, D. M. (1991). Auditory attention switching: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 320–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, S. E., Fox, P. T., Posner, M. I., Mintun, M., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature, 331, 985–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribram, K. H. (1997). The work in working memory: Implications for development. In N. A. Krasnegor & G. R. Lyon (Eds.), Development of the prefrontal cortex: Evolution, Neurobiology, and behavior (pp. 359–378). Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 358–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306, 443–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R., & Gibson, E. (2002). Individual differences in sentence memory. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 573–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G., Blair, J., & Cipolotti, L. (1998). Dynamic aphasia: An inability to select between competing verbal responses? Brain, 121, 77–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 238–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spivey, M., Tanenhaus, M., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J. (2002). Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 447–481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spivey-Knowlton, M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints. Cognition, 55, 227–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of content-based expectations. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 597–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson-Schill, S. L., Bedny, M., & Goldberg, R. F. (2005). The frontal lobes and the regulation of mental activity. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 219–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson-Schill, S. L., D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 14792–14797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson-Schill, S. L., Jonides, J., Marshuetz, C., Smith, E. E., D’Esposito,M., Kan, I. P., Knight, R. T., & Swick, D. (2002). Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson-Schill, S. L., Swick, D., Farah, M. J., D’Esposito, M., Kan, I. P., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: A neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 15855–15860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trueswell, J. [C.], & Gleitman, L. R. (2004). Children’s eye movements during listening: Developmental evidence for a constraint-based theory of sentence processing. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of Language, vision, and action: Eye-movements and the visual world (pp. 319–346). New York: Taylor & Francis, Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueswell, J. C., Papafragou, A., & Choi, Y. (in press). Syntactic and referential processes: What develops? In E. Gibson & N. Perlmutter (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework of constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In C. J. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 155–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 285–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitkovitch, M., & Humphreys, G. W. (1991). Perseverant responding in speeded naming of pictures: It’s in the links. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 664–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton, E., Wise, R. J. S., Price, C. J., Weiller, C., Hadar, U., Ramsay, S., & Frackowiak, R. S. (1996). Noun and verb retrieval by normal subjects: Studies with PET. Brain, 119, 159–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: Critique of Just and Carpenter (1992). Psychological Review, 103, 761–772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilshire, C. E., & McCarthy, R. A. (2002). Evidence for a contextsensitive word retrieval disorder in a case of nonfluent aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. X., Feng, C. M., Fox, P. T., Gao, J. H., & Tan, L. H. (2004). Is left inferior frontal gyrus a general mechanism for selection? NeuroImage, 23, 596–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zurif, E. B., Caramazza, A., & Myerson, R. (1972). Grammatical judgments of agrammatic aphasics. Neuropsychologia, 10, 405–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    Jared M. Novick, John C. Trueswell & Sharon L. Thompson-Schill

Authors
  1. Jared M. Novick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John C. Trueswell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sharon L. Thompson-Schill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared M. Novick.

Additional information

This research was part of J.M.N.’s dissertation work and was supported by NIH Grants R01-HD37507 awarded to J.C.T. and R01-MH67008 awarded to S.L.T.-S.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Novick, J.M., Trueswell, J.C. & Thompson-Schill, S.L. Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 5, 263–281 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.3.263

Download citation

  • Received: 05 January 2004

  • Accepted: 31 March 2005

  • Issue Date: September 2005

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.3.263

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Cognitive Control
  • Stroop Task
  • Ambiguity Resolution
  • Sentence Comprehension
  • Sentence Processing
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

5.135.140.155

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature