Infants’ perception of rhythm and tempo in unimodal and multimodal stimulation: A developmental test of the intersensory redundancy hypothesis

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that young infants can detect a change in the tempo and the rhythm of an event when they experience the event bimodally (audiovisually), but not when they experience it unimodally (acoustically or visually). According to Bahrick and Lickliter (2000, 2002), intersensory redundancy available in bimodal, but not in unimodal, stimulation directs attention to the amodal properties of events in early development. Later in development, as infants become more experienced perceivers, attention becomes more flexible and can be directed toward amodal properties in unimodal and bimodal stimulation. The present study tested this developmental hypothesis by assessing the ability of older, more perceptually experienced infants to discriminate the tempo or rhythm of an event, using procedures identical to those in prior studies. The results indicated that older infants can detect a change in the rhythm and the tempo of an event following both bimodal (audiovisual) and unimodal (visual) stimulation. These results provide further support for the intersensory redundancy hypothesis and are consistent with a pattern of increasing specificity in perceptual development.

References

  1. Allen, M., Dodd, K., Flom, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2003, April). Intersensory redundancy: Five- and seven-month-olds’ perception of affect. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.

  2. Bahrick, L. E. (1983). Infants’ perception of substance and temporal synchrony in multimodal events. Infant Behavior & Development, 6, 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bahrick, L. E. (1987). Infants’ intermodal perception of two levels of temporal structure in natural events. Infant Behavior & Development, 10, 387–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bahrick, L. E. (1988). Intermodal learning in infancy: Learning on the basis of two kinds of invariant relations in audible and visible events. Child Development, 59, 197–209.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bahrick, L. E. (1992). Infants’ perceptual differentiation of amodal and modality-specific audio-visual relations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 53, 180–199.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bahrick, L. E. (1994). The development of infants’ sensitivity to arbitrary intermodal relations. Ecological Psychology, 6, 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bahrick, L. E. (2001). Increasing specificity in perceptual development: Infants’ detection of nested levels of multimodal stimulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 253–270.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bahrick, L. E. (2004). The development of perception in a multimodal environment. In G. Bremner & A. Slater (Eds.), Theories of infant development (pp. 90–120). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bahrick, L. E., Flom, R., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates discrimination of tempo in 3-month-old infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 41, 352- 363.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bahrick, L. E., & Lickliter, R. (2000). Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 36, 190–201.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bahrick, L. E., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Intersensory redundancy guides early cognitive and perceptual development. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 30, pp. 153–187). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bahrick, L. E., Lickliter, R., & Flom, R. (2004a). Intersensory redundancy guides infants’ selective attention, perceptual, and cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bahrick, L.E., Lickliter, R., & Flom, R. (2004b). Up versus down: The role of intersensory redundancy in infants’ sensitivity to the orientation of moving objects. Manuscript under review.

  14. Bahrick, L. E., Lickliter, R., Shuman, M., Batista, L., & Grandez, C. (2003, April). Infant discrimination of voices: Predictions from the intersensory redundancy hypothesis. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.

  15. Bahrick, L. E., Moss, L., & Fadil, C. (1996). The development of visual self-recognition in infancy. Ecological Psychology, 8, 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barrera, M., & Maurer, D. (1981). Recognition of mother’s photographed face by the three month old infant. Child Development, 52, 714–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bertenthal, B. I., Haith, M. M., & Campos, J. J. (1983). The partiallag design: A method for controlling spontaneous regression in the infant-control habituation paradigm. Infant Behavior & Development, 6, 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Calvert, G. A., Spence, C., & Stein, B. E. (2004). The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Caron, A. J., Caron, R. F., Caldwell, R. C., & Weiss, S. J. (1973). Infant perception of the structural properties of the face. Developmental Psychology, 19, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen, L., & Strauss, M. S. (1979). Concept acquisition in the human infant. Child Development, 50, 419–424.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. DeCasper, A. J, & Fifer, W. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science, 208, 1174–1176.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dodd, B. (1979). Lip reading in infants: Attention to speech presented in-and-out of synchrony. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 478–484.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fagan, J. F. (1972). Infants’ recognition memory for faces. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 14, 453–476.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fagan, J. F. (1976). Infants’ recognition of invariant features of faces. Child Development, 47, 627–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gogate, L. J., & Bahrick, L. E. (1998). Intersensory redundancy facilitates learning of arbitrary relations between vowel sounds and objects in seven-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 69, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hernandez-Reif, M., & Bahrick, L. E. (2001). The development of visual-tactual perception of objects: Amodal relations provide the basis for learning arbitrary relations. Infancy, 2, 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Horowitz, F. D., Paden, L., Bhana, K., & Self, P. (1972). An infantcontrol procedure for studying infant visual fixations. Developmental Psychology, 7, 90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1984). The intermodal representation of speech in infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 7, 361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lewkowicz, D. J. (1996). Infants’ response to the audible and visible properties of the human face: Role of lexical syntactic content, temporal synchrony, gender, and manner of speech. Developmental Psychology, 32, 347–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lewkowicz, D. J. (2000). The development of intersensory temporal perception: An epigenetic systems/limitations view. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 281–308.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lewkowicz, D. J. (2004). Perception of serial order in infants. Developmental Science, 7, 175–184.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lickliter, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2000). The development of infant intersensory perception: Advantages of a comparative, convergentoperations approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 260–280.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L. E., & Honeycutt, H. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates perceptual learning in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychology, 38, 15–23.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L. E., & Honeycutt, H. (2004). Intersensory redundancy enhances memory in bobwhite quail embryos. Infancy, 5, 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L. E., & Markham, R. (2004, May). Intersensory redundancy can educate attention during prenatal development. Paper presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Chicago.

  37. Miller, C. L. (1983). Developmental changes in male/female voice classification by infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 6, 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Miller, C. L., Younger, B. A., & Morse, P. A. (1982). The categorization of male and female voices in infancy. Infant Behavior & Development, 5, 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shimojo, S., & Shams, L. (2001). Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: Plasticity and interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 505–509.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Slater, A., Quinn, P. C., Brown, E., & Hayes, R. (1999). Intermodal perception at birth: Intersensory redundancy guides newborn infants’ learning of arbitrary auditory-visual pairings. Developmental Science, 2, 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Spelke, E. S. (1979). Perceiving bimodally specified events in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 15, 626–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Spelke, E. S., Born, W., & Chu, F. (1983). Perception of moving, sounding objects by four-month-old infants. Perception, 12, 719–732.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Stein, B. E., & Meredith, M. A. (1993). The merging of the senses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Walker-Andrews, A. S. (1997). Infants’ perception of expressive behaviors: Differentiation of multimodal information. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 437–456.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorraine E. Bahrick.

Additional information

This research was supported by NIMH Grants RO1 MH62226 and RO1 MH62225, awarded to the first and second authors, respectively.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bahrick, L.E., Lickliter, R. Infants’ perception of rhythm and tempo in unimodal and multimodal stimulation: A developmental test of the intersensory redundancy hypothesis. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 4, 137–147 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.4.2.137

Download citation

Keywords

  • Perceptual Learning
  • Visual Fixation
  • Visual Recovery
  • Habituation Trial
  • Bimodal Condition