Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
  3. Article
Infants’ perception of rhythm and tempo in unimodal and multimodal stimulation: A developmental test of the intersensory redundancy hypothesis
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

The development of audio–visual temporal precision precedes its rapid recalibration

14 December 2022

Shui’er Han, Yi-Chuan Chen, … David Alais

Spatial and temporal (non)binding of audiovisual rhythms in sensorimotor synchronisation

14 February 2023

Olivia Morgan Lapenta, Peter E. Keller, … Manuel Varlet

Preschoolers’ crossmodal mappings of timbre

12 March 2020

Zachary Wallmark & Sarah E. Allen

The influence of rhythm on detection of auditory and vibrotactile asynchrony

04 March 2020

Andrew P. Lauzon, Frank A. Russo & Laurence R. Harris

Sound frequency affects the auditory motion-onset response in humans

11 July 2018

Mikaella Sarrou, Pia Marlena Schmitz, … Rudolf Rübsamen

Speech and non-speech measures of audiovisual integration are not correlated

24 May 2022

Jonathan M. P. Wilbiks, Violet A. Brown & Julia F. Strand

Perceptual timing precision with vibrotactile, auditory, and multisensory stimuli

26 March 2021

Mercedes B. Villalonga, Rachel F. Sussman & Robert Sekuler

How do human newborns come to understand the multimodal environment?

02 March 2023

Arlette Streri & Maria Dolores de Hevia

An analysis of the processing of intramodal and intermodal time intervals

18 November 2019

Leila Azari, Giovanna Mioni, … Simon Grondin

Download PDF
  • Published: June 2004

Infants’ perception of rhythm and tempo in unimodal and multimodal stimulation: A developmental test of the intersensory redundancy hypothesis

  • Lorraine E. Bahrick1 &
  • Robert Lickliter1 

Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience volume 4, pages 137–147 (2004)Cite this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that young infants can detect a change in the tempo and the rhythm of an event when they experience the event bimodally (audiovisually), but not when they experience it unimodally (acoustically or visually). According to Bahrick and Lickliter (2000, 2002), intersensory redundancy available in bimodal, but not in unimodal, stimulation directs attention to the amodal properties of events in early development. Later in development, as infants become more experienced perceivers, attention becomes more flexible and can be directed toward amodal properties in unimodal and bimodal stimulation. The present study tested this developmental hypothesis by assessing the ability of older, more perceptually experienced infants to discriminate the tempo or rhythm of an event, using procedures identical to those in prior studies. The results indicated that older infants can detect a change in the rhythm and the tempo of an event following both bimodal (audiovisual) and unimodal (visual) stimulation. These results provide further support for the intersensory redundancy hypothesis and are consistent with a pattern of increasing specificity in perceptual development.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Allen, M., Dodd, K., Flom, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2003, April). Intersensory redundancy: Five- and seven-month-olds’ perception of affect. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.

  • Bahrick, L. E. (1983). Infants’ perception of substance and temporal synchrony in multimodal events. Infant Behavior & Development, 6, 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, L. E. (1987). Infants’ intermodal perception of two levels of temporal structure in natural events. Infant Behavior & Development, 10, 387–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, L. E. (1988). Intermodal learning in infancy: Learning on the basis of two kinds of invariant relations in audible and visible events. Child Development, 59, 197–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, L. E. (1992). Infants’ perceptual differentiation of amodal and modality-specific audio-visual relations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 53, 180–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, L. E. (1994). The development of infants’ sensitivity to arbitrary intermodal relations. Ecological Psychology, 6, 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, L. E. (2001). Increasing specificity in perceptual development: Infants’ detection of nested levels of multimodal stimulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 253–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, L. E. (2004). The development of perception in a multimodal environment. In G. Bremner & A. Slater (Eds.), Theories of infant development (pp. 90–120). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, L. E., Flom, R., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates discrimination of tempo in 3-month-old infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 41, 352- 363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, L. E., & Lickliter, R. (2000). Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 36, 190–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, L. E., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Intersensory redundancy guides early cognitive and perceptual development. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 30, pp. 153–187). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, L. E., Lickliter, R., & Flom, R. (2004a). Intersensory redundancy guides infants’ selective attention, perceptual, and cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, L.E., Lickliter, R., & Flom, R. (2004b). Up versus down: The role of intersensory redundancy in infants’ sensitivity to the orientation of moving objects. Manuscript under review.

  • Bahrick, L. E., Lickliter, R., Shuman, M., Batista, L., & Grandez, C. (2003, April). Infant discrimination of voices: Predictions from the intersensory redundancy hypothesis. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.

  • Bahrick, L. E., Moss, L., & Fadil, C. (1996). The development of visual self-recognition in infancy. Ecological Psychology, 8, 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, M., & Maurer, D. (1981). Recognition of mother’s photographed face by the three month old infant. Child Development, 52, 714–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertenthal, B. I., Haith, M. M., & Campos, J. J. (1983). The partiallag design: A method for controlling spontaneous regression in the infant-control habituation paradigm. Infant Behavior & Development, 6, 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, G. A., Spence, C., & Stein, B. E. (2004). The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caron, A. J., Caron, R. F., Caldwell, R. C., & Weiss, S. J. (1973). Infant perception of the structural properties of the face. Developmental Psychology, 19, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Strauss, M. S. (1979). Concept acquisition in the human infant. Child Development, 50, 419–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeCasper, A. J, & Fifer, W. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science, 208, 1174–1176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, B. (1979). Lip reading in infants: Attention to speech presented in-and-out of synchrony. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 478–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J. F. (1972). Infants’ recognition memory for faces. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 14, 453–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J. F. (1976). Infants’ recognition of invariant features of faces. Child Development, 47, 627–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogate, L. J., & Bahrick, L. E. (1998). Intersensory redundancy facilitates learning of arbitrary relations between vowel sounds and objects in seven-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 69, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Reif, M., & Bahrick, L. E. (2001). The development of visual-tactual perception of objects: Amodal relations provide the basis for learning arbitrary relations. Infancy, 2, 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, F. D., Paden, L., Bhana, K., & Self, P. (1972). An infantcontrol procedure for studying infant visual fixations. Developmental Psychology, 7, 90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1984). The intermodal representation of speech in infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 7, 361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewkowicz, D. J. (1996). Infants’ response to the audible and visible properties of the human face: Role of lexical syntactic content, temporal synchrony, gender, and manner of speech. Developmental Psychology, 32, 347–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewkowicz, D. J. (2000). The development of intersensory temporal perception: An epigenetic systems/limitations view. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 281–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewkowicz, D. J. (2004). Perception of serial order in infants. Developmental Science, 7, 175–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lickliter, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2000). The development of infant intersensory perception: Advantages of a comparative, convergentoperations approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 260–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L. E., & Honeycutt, H. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates perceptual learning in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychology, 38, 15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L. E., & Honeycutt, H. (2004). Intersensory redundancy enhances memory in bobwhite quail embryos. Infancy, 5, 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L. E., & Markham, R. (2004, May). Intersensory redundancy can educate attention during prenatal development. Paper presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Chicago.

  • Miller, C. L. (1983). Developmental changes in male/female voice classification by infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 6, 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. L., Younger, B. A., & Morse, P. A. (1982). The categorization of male and female voices in infancy. Infant Behavior & Development, 5, 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimojo, S., & Shams, L. (2001). Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: Plasticity and interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 505–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, A., Quinn, P. C., Brown, E., & Hayes, R. (1999). Intermodal perception at birth: Intersensory redundancy guides newborn infants’ learning of arbitrary auditory-visual pairings. Developmental Science, 2, 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. S. (1979). Perceiving bimodally specified events in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 15, 626–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. S., Born, W., & Chu, F. (1983). Perception of moving, sounding objects by four-month-old infants. Perception, 12, 719–732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B. E., & Meredith, M. A. (1993). The merging of the senses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker-Andrews, A. S. (1997). Infants’ perception of expressive behaviors: Differentiation of multimodal information. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 437–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Florida International University, 33199, Miami, FL

    Lorraine E. Bahrick & Robert Lickliter

Authors
  1. Lorraine E. Bahrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Lickliter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorraine E. Bahrick.

Additional information

This research was supported by NIMH Grants RO1 MH62226 and RO1 MH62225, awarded to the first and second authors, respectively.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bahrick, L.E., Lickliter, R. Infants’ perception of rhythm and tempo in unimodal and multimodal stimulation: A developmental test of the intersensory redundancy hypothesis. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 4, 137–147 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.4.2.137

Download citation

  • Received: 14 October 2003

  • Accepted: 06 May 2004

  • Issue Date: June 2004

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.4.2.137

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Perceptual Learning
  • Visual Fixation
  • Visual Recovery
  • Habituation Trial
  • Bimodal Condition
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 34.239.152.207

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.