Skip to main content
Download PDF

Activation of human motion processing areas during event perception

Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience volume 3, pages 335–345 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

Observers are able to segment continuous everyday activity into meaningful parts. This ability may be related to processing low-level visual cues, such as changes in motion. To address this issue, the present study combined measurement of evoked responses to event boundaries with functional identification of the extrastriate motion complex (MT+) and the frontal eye field (FEF), two regions related to motion perception and eye movements. The results provided strong evidence that MT+ is activated by event boundaries: Individuals’ MT+ regions showed strong responses to event boundaries, and MT+ was collocated with a lateral posterior region that responded at event boundaries. The evidence regarding the FEF was less conclusive: The FEF showed reliable but relatively reduced responses to event boundaries, but the FEF was medial and superior to a frontal area that responded at event boundaries. These results suggest that motion cues, and possibly eye movements, may play key roles in event structure perception.

References

  • Baldwin, D. A., & Baird, J. A. (1999). Action analysis: A gateway to intentional inference. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition (pp. 215–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. G., & Wright, H. F. (1954). Midwest and its children: The psychological ecology of an American town. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta, M., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T. E., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., Drury, H. A., Linenweber, M. R., Petersen, S. E., Raichle, M. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Shulman, G. L. (1998). A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron, 21, 761–773.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, S., Sirigu, A., Lehéricy, S., van de Moortele, P.-F., Pillon, B., Grafman, J., Agid, Y., Dubois, B., & LeBihan, D. (1999). Distinct prefrontal activations in processing sequence at the sentence and script level: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1469–1476.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culham, J., He, S., Dukelow, S., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2001). Visual motion and the human brain: What has neuroimaging told us? Acta Psychologica, 107, 69–94.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. P., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1995). Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huk, A. C., & Heeger, D. J. (2000). Task-related modulation of visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83, 3525–3536.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kourtzi, Z., Bülthoff, H. H., Erb, M., & Grodd, W. (2002). Objectselective responses in the human motion area MT/MST. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 17–18.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 48–55.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science, 293, 1506–1509.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAvoy, M. P., Ollinger, J.M., & Buckner, R. L. (2001). Cluster size thresholds for assessment of significant activation in f MRI [Abstract]. NeuroImage, 13, S 198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K., & Gruendel, J. (1986). Children’s scripts. In K. Nelson (Ed.), Event knowledge: Structure and function in development (pp. 21–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newtson, D. (1976). Foundations of attribution: The perception of ongoing behavior. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 223–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newtson, D., & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newtson, D., Engquist, G., & Bois, J. (1977). The objective basis of behavior units. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 35, 847–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partiot, A., Grafman, J., Sadato, N., Flitman, S., & Wild, K. (1996). Brain activation during script event processing. NeuroReport, 7, 761–766.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paus, T. (1996). Location and function of the human frontal eye-field: A selective review. Neuropsychologia, 34, 475–483.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, L., & Haxby, J. V. (1999). Functional anatomy of pursuit eye movements in humans as revealed by fMRI. Journal of Neurophysiology, 82, 463–471.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosano, C., Krisky, C. M., Welling, J. S., Eddy, W. F., Luna, B., Thulborn, K. R., & Sweeney, J. A. (2002). Pursuit and saccadic eye movement subregions in human frontal eye field: A high-resolution fMRI investigation. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 107–115.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Understanding and summarizing brief stories. In D. Laberge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 265–303). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzman, C. D., Britten, K. H., & Newsome, W. T. (1990). Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction. Nature, 346, 174–177.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirigu, A., Zalla, T., Pillon, B., Grafman, J., Agid, Y., & Dubois, B. (1996). Encoding of sequence and boundaries of scripts following prefrontal lesions. Cortex, 32, 297–310.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swallow, K.M., Braver, T. S., Snyder, A. Z., Speer, N. K., & Zacks, J. M. (2003). Reliability of functional localization using fMRI. Neuro-Image, 20, 1561–1577.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Stuttgart: Thieme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Moscovitch, M., Weinrub, O., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Response properties of the human fusiform face area. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 257–279.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tootell, R. B. H., Reppas, J. B., Kwong, K. K., Malach, R., Born, R. T., Brady, T. J., Rosen, B. R., & Belliveau, J. W. (1995). Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 3215–3230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Essen, D. C. (2002a). Surface management system [Computer database of surface-based atlases for the macaque and human cerebral cortex]. Retrieved from http://pulvinar.wustl.edu:8081/sums/ search.do?filename=ATLAS.

  • Van Essen, D. C. (2002b). Windows on the brain: The emerging role of atlases and databases in neuroscience. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 574–579.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Essen, D. C., Dickson, J., Harwell, J., Hanlon, D., Anderson, C. H., & Drury, H. A. (2001). An integraged software system for surface-based analyses of cerebral cortex. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 41, 1359–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Essen, D. C., Drury, H. A., Harwell, J., & Hanlon, D. (2002). CARET: Computerized anatomical reconstruction and editing toolkit [Computer software and manual]. Retrieved from http://brainmap. wustl.edu/caret

  • Woodward, A. L., & Sommerville, J. A. (2000). Twelve-month-old infants interpret action in context. Psychological Science, 11, 73–77.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, K. (1996). Infants’ individuation and enumeration of actions. Psychological Science, 7, 164–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacks, J.M., Braver, T. S., Sheridan, M. A., Donaldson, D. I., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., Buckner, R. L., & Raichle, M. E. (2001). Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 651–655.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 29–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Washington University, Box 1125, 63130, St. Louis, MO

    Nicole K. Speer, Khena M. Swallow & Jeffery M. Zacks

Authors
  1. Nicole K. Speer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Khena M. Swallow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeffery M. Zacks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffery M. Zacks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Speer, N.K., Swallow, K.M. & Zacks, J.M. Activation of human motion processing areas during event perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 3, 335–345 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.3.4.335

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.3.4.335

Keywords

  • Event Boundary
  • Frontal Region
  • Motion Perception
  • Segment Boundary
  • Localizer Task