Behavior Research Methods

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 212–225 | Cite as

RTbox: A device for highly accurate response time measurements

  • Xiangrui Li
  • Zhen Liang
  • Mario Kleiner
  • Zhong-Lin Lu
Article
  • 590 Downloads

Abstract

Although computer keyboards and mice are frequently used in measuring response times (RTs), the accuracy of these measurements is quite low. Specialized RT collection devices must be used to obtain more accurate measurements. However, all the existing devices have some shortcomings. We have developed and implemented a new, commercially available device, the RTbox, for highly accurate RT measurements. The RTbox has its own microprocessor and high-resolution clock. It can record the identities and timing of button events with high accuracy, unaffected by potential timing uncertainty or biases during data transmission and processing in the host computer. It stores button events until the host computer chooses to retrieve them. The asynchronous storage greatly simplifies the design of user programs. The RTbox can also receive and record external signals as triggers and can measure RTs with respect to external events. The internal clock of the RTbox can be synchronized with the computer clock, so the device can be used without external triggers. A simple USB connection is sufficient to integrate the RTbox with any standard computer and operating system.

References

  1. Arieh, Y., & Marks, L. E. (2008). Cross-modal interaction between vision and hearing: A speed-accuracy analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 412–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brainard, D. H., Pelli, D. G., & Robson, T. (2002). Display characterization. In J. P. Hornak (Ed.), Encyclopedia of imaging science and technology (pp. 172–188). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, S. D., Marley, A. A., Donkin, C., & Heathcote, A. (2008). An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification. Psychological Review, 115, 396–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chambers, C. D., & Brown, M. (2003). Timing accuracy under Microsoft Windows revealed through external chronometry. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Clercq, A., Crombez, G., Buysse, A., & Roeyers, H. (2003). A simple and sensitive method to measure timing accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dosher, B. A. (1976). The retrieval of sentences from memory: A speed-accuracy study. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jastrow, J. (1890). The time relations of mental phenomena. New York: Hodges.Google Scholar
  8. Li, X., Lu, Z. L., Xu, P., Jin, J., & Zhou, Y. (2003). Generating high gray-level resolution monochrome displays with conventional computer graphics cards and color monitors. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 130, 9–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lu, H., Morrison, R. G., Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Role of gamma-band synchronization in priming of form discrimination for multiobject displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 610–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Luce, R. D. (1991). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. McKinney, C. J., MacCormac, E. R., & Welsh-Bohmer, K. A. (1999). Hardware and software for tachistoscopy: How to make accurate measurements on any PC utilizing the Microsoft Windows operating system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Plant, R. R., Hammond, N., & Turner, G. (2004). Self-validating presentation and response timing in cognitive paradigms: How and why? Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Plant, R. R., Hammond, N., & Whitehouse, T. (2003). How choice of mouse may affect response timing in psychological studies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 276–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shimizu, H. (2002). Measuring keyboard response delays by comparing keyboard and joystick inputs. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stewart, N. (2006). A PC parallel port button box provides millisecond response time accuracy under Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 170–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yap, M. J., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2006). Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: Insights from response time distributional analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1324–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiangrui Li
    • 4
  • Zhen Liang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mario Kleiner
    • 3
  • Zhong-Lin Lu
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina
  2. 2.Anhui Medical UniversityHefeiChina
  3. 3.Max Planck Institute for Biological CyberneticsTübingenGermany
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations