Abstract
Nominal responses are the natural way for people to report actions or opinions. Because nominal responses do not generate numerical data, they have been underutilized in behavioral research. On those occasions in which nominal responses are elicited, the responses are customarily aggregated over people or trials so that large-sample statistics can be employed. A new analysis is proposed that directly associates differences among responses with particular sources in factorial designs. A pair of nominal responses either matches or does not; when responses do not match, they vary. That analogue to variance is incorporated in the nominal analysis of “variance” (Nanova ) procedure, wherein the proportions of matches associated with sources play the same role as do sums of squares in an anova . The Nanova table is structured like an ANOVA table. The significance levels of the N ratios formed by comparing proportions are determined by resampling. Fictitious behavioral examples featuring independent groups and repeated measures designs are presented. A Windows program for the analysis is available.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Anderson, N. H. (1961). Scales and statistics: Parametric and nonparametric. Psychological Bulletin, 58, 305–316. doi:10.1037/h0042576
Bock, R. D. (1975). Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chen, Z., & Kuo, L. (2001). A note on the estimation of the multinomial logit model with random effects. American Statistician, 55, 89–95.
Cohen, J. (1968). Multiple regression as a general data-analytic system. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 426–443. doi:10.1037/h0026714
Dyke, G. V., & Patterson, H. D. (1952). Analysis of factorial arrangements when the data are proportions. Biometrics, 8, 1–12.
Edgington, E. S., & Onghena, P. (2007). Randomization tests (4th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Fasolo, B., McClelland, G. H., & Lange, K. (2005). The effect of site design and interattribute correlations on interactive Web-based decisions. In C. P. Haugtvedt, K. Machleit, & R. Yalch (Eds.), Online consumer psychology: Understanding and influencing behavior in the virtual world (pp. 325–344). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fienberg, S. E. (2000). Contingency tables and log-linear models: Basic results and new developments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 643–647.
Gini, C. (1939). Variabilità e concentrazione: Vol. 1 di. Memorie di metodologia statistica. Milano: Giuffrè.
Goodman, L. A. (1971). The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables: Stepwise procedures and direct estimation methods for building models for multiple classifications. Technometrics, 13, 33–61.
Grizzle, J. E. (1971). Multivariate logit analysis. Biometrics, 27, 1057–1062.
Haberman, S. J. (1982). Analysis of dispersion of multinomial responses. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 568–580.
Jain, D., Vilcassim, N., & Chintagunta, P. (1994). A random-coefficients logit brand-choice model applied to panel data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 12, 317–328.
Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes and actions. Social Forces, 13, 230–237.
Lewis, D., & Burke, C. J. (1949). The use and misuse of the chi-square test. Psychological Bulletin, 46, 433–489. doi:10.1037/h0059088
Light, R. J., & Margolin, B. H. (1971). An analysis of variance for categorical data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 534–544.
Lord, F. M. (1953). On the statistical treatment of football numbers. American Psychologist, 8, 750–751.
Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
Matheson, G. (2006). Intervals and ratios: The invariantive transformations of Stanley Smith Stevens. History of the Human Sciences, 19, 65–81. doi:10.1177/0952695106066542
McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zaremba (Ed.), Frontiers in economics (pp. 105–142). New York: Academic Press.
Oden, G. C. (1977). Fuzziness in semantic memory: Choosing exemplars of subjective categories. Memory & Cognition, 5, 198–204.
Onukogu, I. B. (1985). An analysis of variance of nominal data. Biometrical Journal, 27, 375–383. doi:10.1002/bimj.4710270404
Pesarin, F., & De Martini, D. (2002). On unbiasedness and power of permutation tests. Metron, 60, 3–19.
Rodgers, J. L. (2000). The bootstrap, the jackknife, and the randomization test: A sampling taxonomy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 441–456.
Shaffer, J. P. (1973). Defining and testing hypotheses in multidimensional contingency tables. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 127–141. doi:10.1037/h0033865
Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680. doi:10.1126/science.103.2684.677
Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1–41). New York: Wiley.
Weiss, D. J. (2006). Analysis of variance and functional measurement: A practical guide. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through the Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE) under Grant 2007-ST-061-000001. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect views of the U.S.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weiss, D.J. Nominal analysis of “variance”. Behavior Research Methods 41, 901–908 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.901
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.901