Skip to main content
Log in

Allocation of effort as a function of payoffs for individual tasks in a multitasking environment

  • Society for Computers in Psychology
  • Published:
Behavior Research Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

SYNWORK1 software allows the examination of how payoffs affect the allocation of effort by people when they perform four different tasks (memory search, arithmetic, visual monitoring, and auditory monitoring). In a previous study (Wang, Proctor, & Pick, 2007), we showed that participants adopted multitasking strategies allocating relative effort appropriate to payoff differences between the arithmetic and memory tasks, but that they exhibited residual effects of prior payoffs when the payoffs were switched. In the present study, we varied the payoff in two different experiments for only one of these tasks, the memory task in Experiment 1 and the arithmetic task in Experiment 2. Doing this allowed consideration of performance for both the task for which payoff changed explicitly and the other cognitive task, for which the payoff difference was implicit (i.e., relative to the explicit payoff that was manipulated). Although participants adjusted performance on the task for which the payoff explicitly varied, the payoff manipulation had less effect than did the explicit payoff manipulations for both tasks used previously. Also, the change in effort on a task resulting from explicitly increasing its payoff was less than that from decreasing the payoff. SYNWORK1 is a good environment for studying multitasking, but has several limitations that need to be addressed to provide a synthetic work environment that allows investigation of a wider range of theoretically relevant issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alluisi, E. A. (1967). Methodology in the use of synthetic tasks to assess complex performance. Human Factors, 9, 375–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (1963). Concurrent performances: Reinforcement in teraction and response independence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 253–263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elsmore, T. F. (1994). SYNWORK1: A PC-based tool for assessment of performance in a simulated work environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopher, D., Weil, M., & Siegel, D. (1989). Practice under changing priorities: An approach to the training of complex skills. Acta Psychologica, 71, 147–177. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(89)90007-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of responses as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. (1990). Behavior, reinforcement and utility. Psychological Science, 4, 217–224. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00203.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J., & Pashler, H. (2008). Task prioritization in multitasking during driving: Opportunity to abort a concurrent task does not insulate braking responses from dual-task slowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 507–525. doi:10.1002/acp.1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logue, A. W., Forzano, L. B., & Tobin, H. (1992). Independence of reinforcer amount and delay: The generalized matching law and self-control in humans. Learning & Motivation, 23, 326–342. doi:10.1016/0023-9690(92)90012-B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B. B., Jr., & Alluisi, E. A. (1972). Synthetic work: A methodology for assessment of human performance. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 35, 835–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., Wang, D. Y., & Pick, D. F. (1998). An empirical evaluation of the SYNWORK1 multiple-task work environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A., Hambrick, D. Z., Lukas, K. E., & Dell, T. C. (1996). Determinants of adult age differences on synthetic work performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 305–329. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.2.4.305

    Google Scholar 

  • Sit, R. A., & Fisk, A. D. (1999). Age-related performance in a multiple-task environment. Human Factors, 41, 26–34. doi:10.1518/001872099779577345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D.-Y. D., Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (2007). Acquisition and transfer of attention-allocation strategies in a multipletask work environment. Human Factors, 49, 995–1004. doi:10.1518/001872007X249866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 239–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D., & McCarley, J. S. (2008). Applied attention theory. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongyuan Debbie Wang.

Additional information

This research was supported in part by Grant W911NF-05-1-0153 from the Army Research Office.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, D.D., Proctor, R.W. & Pick, D.F. Allocation of effort as a function of payoffs for individual tasks in a multitasking environment. Behavior Research Methods 41, 705–716 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.705

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.705

Keywords

Navigation