Abstract
Both the sensitivity and administration time of a test are important in evaluating visuospatial attention in clinical settings, especially with respect to external validity. The purpose of the present study was to propose an adaptive model that provides a reference for test modification by manipulating target-to-distractor (T/D) ratios and the number of stimuli on the computerized cancellation test system. Tasks with different T/D ratios and numbers of stimuli were presented to two groups—children with and without dyslexia (n=41 and 65, respectively)—to determine whether their visuospatial attention performance differed on different test forms. In general, there were significant differences between the two groups in hit rates, completion times, and performance quality (PQ) scores. The PQ score of visual attention was affected by the T/D ratios rather than by the number of stimuli. The findings suggested that the T/D ratio has a strong effect on PQ scores, and that it should be taken into consideration in test and task design.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ben-Yehudah, G., Sackett, E., Malchi-Ginzberg, L., & Ahissar, M. (2001). Impaired temporal contrast sensitivity in dyslexics is specific to retain-and-compare paradigms. Brain, 124, 1381–1395.
Byrd, D. A., Touradji, P., Tang, M. X., & Manly, J. J. (2004). Cancellation test performance in African American, Hispanic, and White elderly. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 401–411.
Casco, C., & Prunetti, E. (1996). Visual search of good and poor readers: Effects with targets having single and combined features. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 82, 1155–1167.
Casco, C., Tressoldi, P. E., & Dellantonio, A. (1998). Visual selective attention and reading efficiency are related in children. Cortex, 34, 531–546.
Chatterjee, A., Thompson, K. A., & Ricci, R. (1999). Quantitative analysis of cancellation tasks in neglect. Cortex, 35, 253–262.
Dawson, D. R., & Tanner-Cohen, C. (1997). Visual scanning patterns in an adult Chinese population: Preliminary normative data. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 17, 264–279.
Di Filippo, G., Brizzolara, D., Chilosi, A., De Luca, M., Judica, A., & Pecini, C. (2005). Rapid naming, not cancelation speed or articulation rate, predicts reading in an orthographically regular language (Italian). Child Neuropsychology, 11, 349–361.
Diller, L., Ben-Yishay, Y., Gerstman, L. J., Goodkin, W., & Weinberg, J. (1974). Studies in cognition and rehabilitation in hemiplegia. New York: New York University Medical Center.
Dumont, R., Stevens, C., Dawson, M. M., Guare, R., & Weiler, M. (2001). Obtained score differences on the Mesulam continuous performance test: A comparison between ADHD subjects and controls. Retrieved June 1, 2007, from http://alpha.fdu.edu/psychology/ Mesulam_article.htm.
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.
Facoetti, A., Lorusso, M. L., Paganoni, P., Umiltà, C., & Mascetti, G. G. (2003). The role of visuospatial attention in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from a rehabilitation study. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 154–164.
Friedmann, N., & Nachman-Katz, I. (2004). Developmental neglect dyslexia in a Hebrew-reading child. Cortex, 40, 301–313.
Gauthier, L., Dehaut, F., & Joanette, Y. (1989). The Bells test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 49–54.
Geldmacher, D. S. (1996). Effects of stimulus number and target-todistractor ratio on the performance of random array letter cancellation tasks. Brain & Cognition, 32, 405–415.
Geldmacher, D. S. (1998). Stimulus characteristics determine processing approach on random array letter-cancellation tasks. Brain & Cognition, 36, 346–354.
Geldmacher, D. S., & Alhaj, M. (1999). Spatial aspects of letter cancellation performance in Arabic readers. International Journal of Neuroscience, 97, 29–39.
Geldmacher, D. S., Doty, L., & Heilman, K. M. (1994). Spatial performance bias in healthy elderly subjects on a letter cancellation task. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology, 7, 275–280.
Halligan, P., & Marshall, J. (1992). Left visuo—spatial neglect: A meaningless entity? Cortex, 28, 525–535.
Halligan, P., Wilson, B., & Cockburn, J. (1990). A short screening test for visual neglect in stroke patients. International Disability Studies, 12, 95–99.
Hari, R., Renvall, H., & Tanskanen, T. (2001). Left minineglect in dyslexic adults. Brain, 124, 1373–1380.
Hawelka, S., & Wimmer, H. (2005). Impaired visual processing of multi-element arrays is associated with increased number of eye movements in dyslexic reading. Vision Research, 45, 855–863.
Heiervang, E., & Hugdahl, K. (2003). Impaired visual attention in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 68–73.
Hogeboom, M., & van Leeuwen, C. (1997). Visual search strategy and perceptual organization covary with individual preference and structural complexity. Acta Psychologica, 95, 141–164.
Iles, J., Walsh, V., & Richardson, A. (2000). Visual search performance in dyslexia. Dyslexia, 6, 163–177.
Kiliç, B. G., Sener, S., Koçkar, A. I., & Karakas, S. (2007). Multicomponent attention deficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences, 61, 142–148.
Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Mesulam, M. M. (2000). Principles of behavior and cognitive neurology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Quintana, L. (1995). Evaluation of perception and cognition. In C. Trombly (Ed.), Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction (pp. 201–224). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Roeltgen, D. P., & Roeltgen, M. G. (1990). Asymmetric lateralized attention in children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 6, 25–37.
Ruff, R. M., Evans, R. W., & Light, R. H. (1986). Automatic detection vs controlled search: A paper-and-pencil approach. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 62, 407–416.
Scharroo, J., Stalmeier, P. F. M., & Boselie, F. (1994). Visual search and segregation as a function of display complexity. Journal of General Psychology, 121, 5–17.
Shalev, L., & Tsal, Y. (2003). The wide attentional window: A major deficit of children with attention difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 517–527.
Sireteanu, R., Goebel, C., Goertz, R., & Wandert, T. (2006). Do children with developmental dyslexia show a selective visual attention deficit? Strabismus, 14, 85–93.
Sireteanu, R., Goertz, R., Bachert, I., & Wandert, T. (2005). Children with developmental dyslexia show a left visual “minineglect.” Vision Research, 45, 3075–3082.
Stein, J., & Walsh, V. (1997). To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 147–152.
Taroyan, N. A., Nicolson, R. I., & Fawcett, A. J. (2007). Behavioural and neurophysiological correlates of dyslexia in the continuous performance task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 845–855.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
Trick, L. M., & Enns, J. T. (1998). Lifespan changes in attention: The visual search task. Cognitive Development, 13, 369–386.
Vidyasagar, T. R., & Pammer, K. (1999). Impaired visual search in dyslexia relates to the role of the magnocellular pathway in attention. NeuroReport, 10, 1283–1287.
Wang, T.-Y., Huang, H.-C., & Huang, H. S. (2006). Design and implementation of cancelation tasks for visual search strategies and visual attention in school children. Computers & Education, 47, 1–16.
Wasserman, J. D., Mitchell, J. H., & Melrose, S. (1995). Development of visual search strategies in normal children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 400–401.
Weintraub, S., & Mesulam, M. M. (1988). Visual hemispatial inattention: Stimulus parameters and exploratory strategies. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 51, 1481–1488.
Williams, M. C., Brannan, J. R., & Lartigue, E. K. (1987). Visual search in good and poor readers. Clinical Vision Sciences, 1, 367–371.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Grant NSC94-2614-S-51-001 from the National Science Council (NSC), Taiwan.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, HC., Wang, TY. Stimulus effects on cancellation task performance in children with and without dyslexia. Behavior Research Methods 41, 539–545 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.539
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.539