Behavior Research Methods

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 1129–1133 | Cite as

The Creative Task Creator: A tool for the generation of customized, Web-based creativity tasks



This article presents a Web-based tool for the creation of divergent-thinking and open-ended creativity tasks. A Java program generates HTML forms with PHP scripting that run an Alternate Uses Task and/or open-ended response items. Researchers may specify their own instructions, objects, and time limits, or use default settings. Participants can also be prompted to select their best responses to the Alternate Uses Task (Silvia et al., 2008). Minimal programming knowledge is required. The program runs on any server, and responses are recorded in a standard MySQL database. Responses can be scored using the consensual assessment technique (Amabile, 1996) or Torrance’s (1998) traditional scoring method. Adoption of this Web-based tool should facilitate creativity research across cultures and access to eminent creators. The Creative Task Creator may be downloaded from the Psychonomic Society’s Archive of Norms, Stimuli, and Data,

Supplementary material (199 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 340 KB.


  1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, S. L., Gallaher, P. E., Sun, P., Pearce, S., Zogg, J. B., Houska, B. R., et al. (2005). A Web-based program for coding open-ended response protocols. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 470–479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  4. Fraley, R. C. (2007). Using the Internet for personality research: What can be done, how to do it, and some concerns. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 130–148). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  5. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Kaufman, J. C. (2002). Narrative and paradigmatic thinking styles in creative writing and journalism students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 201–220.Google Scholar
  8. Landers, C., & Pretz, J. E. (2008). Development of domain-general and domain-specific creativity among college students. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  9. Niu, W., Zhang, J. X., & Yang, Y. (2007). Deductive reasoning and creativity: A cross-cultural study. Psychological Reports, 100, 509–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Reips, U.-D. (2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243–256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Runco, M. A. (1991). The evaluative, valuative, and divergent thinking of children. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 311–319.Google Scholar
  13. Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, & the Arts, 2, 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Simonton, D. K. (1999a). Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 116–133). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Simonton, D. K. (1999b). Significant samples: The psychological study of eminent individuals. Psychological Methods, 4, 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Torrance, E. P. (1998). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual: Figural (streamlined) forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentIllinois Wesleyan UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations