A list of role names for future use in research on gender stereotyping was created and evaluated. In two studies, 126 role names were rated with reference to their gender stereotypicality by English-, French-, and German-speaking students of universities in Switzerland (French and German) and in the U.K. (English). Role names were either presented in specific feminine and masculine forms (Study 1) or in the masculine form (generic masculine) only (Study 2). The rankings of the stereotypicality ratings were highly reliable across languages and questionnaire versions, but the overall mean of the ratings was less strongly male if participants were also presented with the female versions of the role names and if the latter were presented on the left side of the questionnaires.
Baudino, C. (2001). Politique de la langue et différence sexuelle: La politisation du genre des noms de métier [Language policies and sexual differences: The political awareness of the gender of professional occupations]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Beggs, J. M., & Doolittle, D. C. (1993). Perceptions now and then of occupational sex typing: A replication of Shinar’s 1975 study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23, 1435–1453.
Colé, P., & Segui, J. (1994). Grammatical incongruency and vocabulary types. Memory & Cognition, 22, 387–394.
Couch, J. V., & Sigler, J. N. (2001). Gender perception of professional occupations. Psychological Reports, 88, 693–698.
Duffy, S. A., & Keir, J. A. (2004). Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 32, 551–559.
Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Reynolds, D. (2002). Are inferences from stereotyped role names to characters’ gender made elaboratively? Memory & Cognition, 30, 439–446.
Kennison, S. M., & Trofe, L. (2003). Comprehending pronouns: A role for word-specific gender stereotype information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 355–378.
Oakhill, J., Garnham, A., & Reynolds, D. (2005). Immediate activation of stereotypical gender information. Memory & Cognition, 33, 972–983.
Rammstedt, B., & Krebs, D. (2007). Does response scale format affect the answering of personality scales? Assessing the Big Five dimensions of personality with different response scales in a dependent sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 32–38.
Sastre, M. T., Fouquereau, E., Igier, V., Salvatore, N., & Mullet, E. (2000). Perception of occupational gender typing: A replication on European samples of Shinar’s (1975) and Beggs and Doolittle’s (1993) studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 430–441.
Shinar, E. H. (1975). Sexual stereotypes of occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 7, 99–111.
Stahlberg, D., Braun, F., Irmen, L., & Sczesny, S. (2007). Representation of the sexes in language. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 163–187). New York: Psychology Press.
Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 542–562.
This research was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Foundation (100013-109705j) to U.G. and P.G.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Gabriel, U., Gygax, P., Sarrasin, O. et al. Au pairs are rarely male: Norms on the gender perception of role names across English, French, and German. Behav Res 40, 206–212 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.206
- Online Appendix
- German Sample
- Flight Attendant
- Grammatical Form
- English Sample