Behavior Research Methods

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 344–352 | Cite as

An SPSS implementation of the nonrecursive outlier deletion procedure with shiftingz score criterion (Van Selst & Jolicoeur, 1994)

Articles
  • 401 Downloads

Abstract

Sophisticated univariate outlier screening procedures are not yet available in widely used statistical packages such as SPSS. However, SPSS can accept user-supplied programs for executing these procedures. Failing this, researchers tend to rely on simplistic alternatives that can distort data because they do not adjust to cell-specific characteristics. Despite their popularity, these simple procedures may be especially ill suited for some applications (e.g., data from reaction time experiments). A user friendly SPSS Production Facility implementation of the shifting z score criterion procedure (Van Selst & Jolicoeur, 1994) is presented in an attempt to make it easier to use. In addition to outlier screening, optional syntax modules can be added that will perform tedious database management tasks (e.g., restructuring or computing means).

References

  1. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., &Yap, M. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dolan, C. V., van der Maas, H. L. J., &Molenaar, P. C. M. (2000). A framework for ML estimation of parameters of (mixtures of) common reaction time distributions given optional truncation or censoring.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,34, 304–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Enders, C. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data.Structural Equation Modeling,8, 128–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Miller, J. (1988). A warning about median reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 539–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Miller, J. (1991). Reaction time analysis with outlier exclusion: Bias varies with sample size.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 907–912.Google Scholar
  6. Perry, C. (2003). A phoneme-grapheme feedback consistency effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 392–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers.Psychological Bulletin,114, 510–532.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Roberts, M. A., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., &Besner, D. (2003). When parallel processing in visual word recognition is not enough: New evidence from naming.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schafer, J. L., &Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art.Psychological Methods,7, 147–177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sinharay, S., Stern, H. S., &Russell, D. (2001). The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data.Psychological Methods,6, 317–329.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ulrich, R., &Miller, J. (1994). Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 34–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Van Selst, M., &Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 631–650.Google Scholar
  13. Yates, M., Locker, L., Jr., &Simpson, G. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 452–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations