Advertisement

Psychonomic Science

, Volume 3, Issue 1–12, pp 17–18 | Cite as

Reinforcement of intracranial self-stimulation by licking

  • Solon B. Holstein
  • Alan G. Hundt
Physiological Psychology
  • 92 Downloads

Abstract

Parameters which made licking more probable than intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) were used. Under these conditions, ICSS served as an instrumental response and licking as the reinforcing response. When licking was made contingent on ICSS, ICSS was greatly increased relative to its base duration and frequency.

Keywords

Brain Stimulation Base Duration Midbrain Tegmentum Rant Level Total Lick 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Brownstein, A. Predicting instrumental performance from the independent rates of contingent responses in a choice situation. J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 63, 29–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hodos, W., & Valenstein, E. S. An evaluation of response rate as a measure of rewarding intracranial stimulation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol, 1962, 55, 80–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hull, C. L. Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century, 1943.Google Scholar
  4. Miller, N. E. Some reflection on law of effect produce a new alternative to drive reduction. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1963. Pp. 65–112.Google Scholar
  5. Olds, J. Hypothalamic substrates of reward. Physiol. Rev., 1962, 43, 554–604.Google Scholar
  6. Premack, D. Toward empirical behavior laws. I: Positive reinforcement. Psychol. Rev., 1959, 66, 219–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Premack, D. Reversibility of the reinforcement relation. Science, 1962, 136, 255–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Premack, D. Rate differential reinforcement in monkey manipulation. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1963a, 6, 81–89.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Premack, D. Prediction of the comparative reinforcement values of running and drinking. Science, 1963b,139, 1062–1063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schaeffer, R. Contributions of the operant level of the instrumental response to the reinforcement relation. J. exp. Psychol., in press.Google Scholar
  11. Sidman, M., Brady, J. V., Boren, J. J., & Conrad, D. G. Reward schedules and behaviors maintained by intracranial self-stimulation. Science, 1955, 122, 830–831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Skinner, B. F. The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century, 1938.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Press 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • Solon B. Holstein
    • 1
  • Alan G. Hundt
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MissouriUSA

Personalised recommendations