Abstract
In an attempt to determine how subjects dealt with four types of logical sentence relationships when a figurative possibility was present, two different experiments were run using a procedure originally developed by Steinberg (1970a). Results indicated that a great many anomalous sentences are readily classified as metaphoric and that individual differences play an important role in the use of these categories. Further analyses revealed that sentences having the order “The ‘human’ is an ‘animal’ ” were more easily classified as metaphorical than sentences having any other order in the present set of sentences. The findings were discussed in terms of their implications for semantic theory, where it was noted that metaphoric diction makes a purely logical analysis of language exceedingly suspect and that any attempt to define sentence universais must include not only figurative language, but individual differences as well.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chomsky, N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1965.
Katz, J. J. Some remarks on Quine on analyticity. Journal of Philosophy, 1967, 64, 36–52.
Katz, J. J. Semantic theory. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.
Osborne, M. M., & Ehninger, D. The metaphor in public address. Speech Monographs, 1962, 29, 223–234.
Pollio, H., & Burns, B. C. The anomaly of anomaly. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1977, 6, 247–260.
Pollio, H., & Smith, M. Metaphoric style and complex human problem solving. In R. Hoffman & R. Honeck (Eds.), The psycholinguistics of figurative language. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, in press.
Rosch, E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, 104, 192–233.
Smith, E., Shoben, E., & Rips, L. Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 1974, 81, 214–241.
Steinberg, D. D. Analyticity, amphigory and semantic interpretation of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9, 37–51. (a)
Steinberg, D. D. Negation, analyticity, amphigory and the semantic interpretation of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 84, 417–423. (b)
Steinberg, D. D. Semantic universais in sentence processing and interpretation: A study of Chinese, Finnish, Japanese, and Slovenian speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1975, 4, 169–193.
Thomas, O. Metaphor and related subjects. New York: Random House, 1969.
Verbrugge, R. R.,& McCarrell, N. S. Metaphoric comprehension: Studies in reminding and resembling. Cognitive Psychology, 1977, 9, 494–533.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pollio, H.R., Smith, M.K. Sense and nonsense in thinking about anomaly and metaphor. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 13, 323–326 (1979). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336884
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336884