Abstract
This study replicates a previous study which purportedly tested and confirmed the applicability of the Premack principle to verbal learning. Ninety male and female Ss learned paired associate (PA) lists (comprised of words of intermediate response probabilities) in which the response words were reinforced (i.e., immediately followed) by words of high, intermediate, or low probabilities. Word probabilities were obtained from two standard word count sources. As was anticipated, no differential effects of the probability of the “reinforcement” words were obtained, as measured by trials to criterion for learning the PA lists. The failure of this experiment to support this application of the Premack principle was attributed to inappropriate methodologies used in identifying word probabilities. An appropriate method for testing the Premack principle in a PA learning task was described.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Hawker, J. The influence of training procedure and other task variables in paired-associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1964, 3, 70–76.
Kausler, D., McLaughlin, B., & Kulik, J. S-R and R-S paired-associate learning with varying occurrence of response members. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1962, 1, 85–90.
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R. I: Brown University Press, 1967.
McIntire, R. Reinforcement and Verbal Learning: A test of the Premack hypothesis. Psychological Reports. 1963, 12, 99–102
Premack, D. Toward empirical behavior laws: I. Positive reinforcement. Psychological Review, 1959, 66, 219–233.
Premack, D. Reinforcement theory. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1965, Pp. 123–180.
Thorndike, E., & Lorge, I. The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teacher’s College, Columbia University 1944.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Appreciation is due to Mary V. Moore, June Covin, and Bryan Crow for their assistance in data collection.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schaeffer, R.W., Nolan, R.J. Verbal learning and reinforcement: A reexamination of the Premack hypothesis. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 4, 431–433 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336745
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336745