Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Science
  3. Article
Discrimination contrast: Speeds to small reward as a function of locus and amount of Interpolated reinforcement
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Pigeons can learn a difficult discrimination if reinforcement is delayed following choice

21 February 2020

Dalton House, Daniel Peng & Thomas R. Zentall

Enhancing “self-control”: The paradoxical effect of delay of reinforcement

05 February 2020

Thomas R. Zentall

Pigeons’ midsession reversal: Greater magnitude of reinforcement on the first half of the session leads to improved accuracy

22 July 2020

Peyton M. Mueller & Thomas R. Zentall

The paradoxical performance by different species on the ephemeral reward task

24 June 2020

Thomas R. Zentall

Midsession reversal learning by pigeons: Effect on accuracy of increasing the number of stimuli associated with one of the alternatives

16 August 2019

Thomas R. Zentall, Daniel N. Peng, … Ryan Yadav

Motivated to time: Effects of reinforcer devaluation and opportunity cost on interval timing

13 February 2023

Tanya A. Gupta & Federico Sanabria

Gradient Shift is Sensitive to the Width of the Generalization Test Range

25 March 2019

Adam Derenne

Reward Prediction Errors Reflect an Underlying Learning Process That Parallels Behavioural Adaptations: A Trial-to-Trial Analysis

18 October 2019

Chad C. Williams, Cameron D. Hassall, … Olave E. Krigolson

The push and pull of dopamine in cue-reward learning

08 February 2019

Sean B. Ostlund

Download PDF
  • Animal Behavior
  • Published: 14 November 2013

Discrimination contrast: Speeds to small reward as a function of locus and amount of Interpolated reinforcement

  • Frederick R. Maxwell Jr.1,
  • Philip A. Meyer1 nAff222,
  • Richard S. Calef1 &
  • …
  • Earl R. McHewitt1 

Psychonomic Science volume 14, pages 35–36 (1969)Cite this article

  • 189 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Three groups of rats (C, D, and E) each received, during a daily session, two runway trials in one-half of a differential conditioning apparatus to one-pellet reward. Groups C and E also received one and 12 pellets, respectively, in a placement cage twice during a session. Group D received two additional 12-pellet trials in the other half of the differential conditioning apparatus. The S— (one-pellet) speeds of Group D over the later stages of training were significantly below the approximately equivalent performance level attained by Groups E and C.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • BOWER, G. H. A contrast effect in differential conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961, 62, 196–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DUNHAM, P. J. Contrasted conditions of reinforcement: A selective critique. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 295–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LUDVIGSON, H. W., & GAY, S. E. Differential reward conditioning: S— contrast as a function of the magnitude of S+. Psychonomic Science, 1966, 5, 289–290.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. Philip A. Meyer

    Present address: University of South Dakota, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, III, 62901, USA

    Frederick R. Maxwell Jr., Philip A. Meyer, Richard S. Calef & Earl R. McHewitt

Authors
  1. Frederick R. Maxwell Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philip A. Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard S. Calef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Earl R. McHewitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The authors are indebted to James H. McHose for advice and assistance throughout the course of the investigation which was supported by Research Grant MH 10340 from the United States Public Health Service.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maxwell, F.R., Meyer, P.A., Calef, R.S. et al. Discrimination contrast: Speeds to small reward as a function of locus and amount of Interpolated reinforcement. Psychon Sci 14, 35–36 (1969). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336413

Download citation

  • Published: 14 November 2013

  • Issue Date: January 1969

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336413

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Daily Session
  • Large Reward
  • Reward Magnitude
  • Small Reward
  • Differential Conditioning
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 167.114.118.212

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.